Questions

Common issues that can impact the technical quality of images include exposure issues, soft focus, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise

Hi all, some help would be appreciated, I'm trying to learn what Adobe Stock is looking for. I am not new to photography, I have checked the photos in Lightroom for exposure issues and did not find any. Are they just not unique enough - there's already enough sunflowers and tree images going around? Maybe birch shot seems too crowded? All creative choices made were intentional. Thanks for your input. 

first time contributing. can folks suggest what is wrong with the quality of this photo? 

so, These aare my pictures and i wanted to publish these but i think i'm not good at the presentation or in the act of publishing.

Bana yardım edin lütfen  

Can anyone tell me why the images I submit for review on Adobe Stock take a very very long time? 

A sense of affection for nature is generated among common people through photography. I have seen that photography of nature has always inspired us to protect it. In photography, we show the development and difficulties of nature together. In the era of modern photography, when we are doing nature photography, we have to wait more patiently and for a good photograph, but it is also true that a good photograph has the power to tell the truth and a deep thing. I am doing nature photography, so I believe that along with the development of nature, we should also make its difficulties a prominent part of photography. I believe that photographs become the identity of any era, in this era it has become easy to save photographs, so it is necessary that the truth of nature should be highlighted in the same way as we see it. Where it is better, do it better and where improvement seems necessary, we can play our role in making a path for improvement through photography.

There was a period when black and white photography dominated the scene, but as time progressed, significant advancements occurred. The realm of photography has undergone numerous transformations; once regarded as a costly pastime, it has evolved with the advent of mobile technology, alongside the continued popularity of DSLRs. While it is undeniable that the mobile revolution has simplified photography, it is also important to recognize that the elegance associated with the black and white era has diminished. I contend that there remains considerable potential for growth in the field of photography. In addition to instructing the younger generation in the art of photography, we should also enlighten them about the historical context of the craft. The narratives of renowned photographers who dedicated their lives to elevating photography should be shared as well. My focus lies in both nature photography and black and white photography; I believe that while an expensive camera can yield

Hello. Yesterday I uploaded an image of the texture of the stone wall, and already this morning the photo was checked and accepted, which undoubtedly pleased me, because recently the acceptance rate was, so to speak, not particularly high, but the question is different. Upon a detailed examination of the photo in the showcase, I found that it lacks the holographic protection of "adobe stock". At first I thought it was just hard to see, because this phenomenon can be traced in some pictures, but on closer inspection I realized that it was not there at all! Then I looked at very old photos of the texture of the bricks, which I sent one of the first three years ago, and saw the same picture, the protection is completely missing.Can you comment on this?

Dear Adobe stock reviewers and Adobe officials,I've been publishing illustrations for some time as a contributor on Adobe Stock.1/ The time for acceptance is way too long (one of my illustration has been waiting for a review for 3 months) and is still not accepted or rejected,2/ Some of my vectors illustrations (svg format) were accepted as jpg only Several times. So I have to withdraw them and publish them again. Two more months waiting for acceptance at least...3/ My publications are not accepted in the order they were published on Adobe contributor platform, contrary to what is annonced by Adobe.I hope officials will take a look into the matter. Regards

Showing that error, when im trying to Login Adobe Stock Contributor   [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

I have images already accepted and online. Can I add additional keywords once the images have been accepted?

First time poster. Could you help me with these photos that were declined due to quality issues?  This is my first time working with photography so i'm soaking in all the tips and knowledge! 

Hi Everyone,   This morning Pacific Daylight Time, we emailed our contributors the following message.   “We wanted you to be the first to know that today Adobe introduced Adobe Firefly, a new family of creative generative AI models. Firefly’s initial focus on images and test effects is now available in beta at firefly.adobe.com. The first model of Firefly is trained on Adobe Stock images, openly licensed content, and public domain content, where copyright has expired and is designed to generate images safe for commercial use. During the beta phase, the Firefly-generated assets cannot be used for commercial purposes.   We are investing in generative AI to help creators transform the way they imagine and explore possibilities. We are committed to developing generative AI responsibly, with creators at the center. Through efforts like the Content Authenticity Initiative, we’re standing up for accountability, responsibility, and transparency in generative AI. We are developin

Hello! I finally got off my butt and took the first steps to learning stock photography. Literally everything was rejected for quality issues. So, I'd love to hear some critiques. As I'm realizing now I may not know what to look for with this genre. The photo below is what i'd consider my strongest photo, from the rejection pile. My best guess now, would be that maybe I shouldn't be so artsy with the focal point?Thanks for any insights you provide!   

I am a newbie. I communicate through a translator, so the essence may not be exactly conveyed. I found part of the answers to the question "Why was it rejected" myself. But I would also like your tips. Thank you

I was rejected for these, I don't understand why, I appreciate your comments to improve. Another question, if they constantly reject my photos, can they block my account? 

Created an account and added 2 illustrations, one was reviewed after 4 days, the other was pending for a week, I deleted it. Then I uploaded 10 illustrations and they passed the review in 2 days. Then I uploaded about 200 images, they passed the review in 2 days, and even 2 illustrations sold. Then I noticed 41 illustrations were rejected, but before that I uploaded over 300 illustrations and here they are for review.I have a few questions:Could the rejected illustrations have affected the review rate?Could the rejected illustrations have affected the illustrations' showings and lack of sales?What factors affect the speed of review? (keywords? subject matter? title? media type? presence of rejected illustrations? )

Help please? I'm trying to understand why this image was rejected "Intellectual Property Refusal".  It had a full Adobe-style release form.  Here's the metadata:TITLE: Female vampire stands in front of gothic window. Wetplate collodion (4 of 4).DESCRIPTION: Scary female vampire in front of a spooky gothic window (4 of 4). Dark atmospheric lighting, the black and white photo. 19th century chemical process called wetplate collodionKEYWORDS: Halloween, vampire, dracula, spooky, horror, vlad, atmospheric, dark, scary, gothic, transylvania, costume, witch, creepy, goth, gothic, ghost, supernatural, black and white, monochrome, wetplate, collodion, victorian, glamour, blood, woman, beauty, model, face, eyes, dark, black, makeup, lips, lady, sensuality, elegance, close-up, posing, teeth I'm scratching my head...

Hello all, I am brand new to Adobe Stock and have been working on some photos to upload. I am hoping someone can give me some clarity on what I can and can't upload. I will list the photos I have below so you guys can clarify for me. Before you read, please note I have read through the guidelines but I just want some clarifaction from some humans before I go and upload what I want to upload. Also, I will upload an example of each type of picture below.     - Photos of cars in public (All license plates and people blurred) - Photos of cars in dealerships - Photos from Walt Disney World (For ex the storm troopers in the bay on the star wars ride) - Flags with Car Make Logos   That's about it. Thanks in advance for your help!   [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

I had invitation to apply for contributing video templates to Adobe Stock about 2 months ago. I filled the application form. However, I haven't received any feedback yet. Does it mean that I am rejected or is it still in processing period? Is there any way to get feedback or improve my application based on what they require?  Thank you.

My name is Samson Mehboob Alam and pics generating is my passion and i like this job thanks for Adobe Stock who give me opportunity that i show here our telent thanks Adobe Stock 

Can you help me why this images is being rejected ? They are made with AI. Have all specs adobe stock needed. But rejected. Hope for advise. Thank you.

Film noir and gangster movies are well-established movie and artistic genres. Would you stop Quentin Tarantino, Hitchcock, or Scorcese?Any insight, please.

Can anyone tell me why this image is being rejected because of quality problems? I need to know in order to improve. I have seen images from other creators and they are much worse with aberrations. This one I think is great and looks very good. I don't understand.