Stock Contributors

The image was shot on a Canon R5 with a 70-200 lens (170 mm focal length), stitching 5 images together. The R5 is not even mine I waited to take this shot till I had a loaner from Canon so the quality would be the best possible. The resolution is perfect, 10923 x 6144, ideal resolution for vertical or horizontal use. It could be better but had to crunch it down a little to fit within the boundaries of 20mb file size limit. I was shocked when it came back rejected on quality. Exposure and focus is perfect, there are no filters used post, I’ve even used a polarise filter in camera to sharpen the haze and contrast, I cut the noise back a much as possible before loosing detail, YOU CAN EVEN READ UTS ON THE BUILDING FROM 11km away!!! The overall detail can’t really be better for this type of cityscape panorama photo. My question is how could anyone actually shoot the same shot any better? What is allowed if this type of landscape photo is not. What is actually the problem and how

 Can anyone please criticize this picture from different aspects with feedbacks of recommended improvements?

Hello everyone,As soon the pandemic started, i was sent home and had a free time to put on new ideas. I started making some ultra detailed isometric illustrations of my city (São Paulo). Some of it got so big that i actually had to divide them in smaller pieces to make them more comercialized.I uploaded 4 of them and only one was approved. 3 of them are still waiting, and after 4 months, they are still there!I dont know how the curators see it, but is it possible that my arts somehow had been forgotten there? The sad thing is that this week is the 470 anniversary of the city, and i might be missing some download opportunities (franckly, they are one of my best and sharpest jobs).Please, somebody help me!

I submitted an aerial yoga series and they were rejected as non-compliant. These are aerial yoga poses normally done in a class, so I do not understand what they see that does not comply. All images are model released and a large number of the series were accepted.

I had several images rejected for intellectual property issues but there are no identifying logos or trademarks and the clothing and studio are very generic. Any ideas?

Can I have 2 adobe contributor accounts in which I will publish Ai content. I just want to divide my Ai content, one account will have more background images, and the other will have a different theme. Will I have a problem?

Hi all, Facing problem during submitting images where the main object(real person) is cut out from real photo and have been put on blurred Ai generated background.  I marked image as AI generative before submitting  . Model release was added.  reject reason is "NON-COMPLIANT IMAGE" how should i upload such of content? could not find answer in guide. Best regarsIgor  

Hello,Question, if you have experience with multiple contributor accounts, and have been banned or not. I would like to know if I can  open multiple contributor accounts for different asset types. Per the guidelines, it looks like I can. For example, a separate account for Videos.https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/submission-guidelines.html So, specifically, I would like to know if I create this new account for Videos only, do I have to delete videos from the original account? Or can I start uploading videos to this new account, going forward, as long as I don't post videos to the first account? I'm trying to see if I can track individual types of videos/images separately, without getting my account(s) closed.

Hi everyone, before submitting my photos should I check them at 100% zoom level? I do see some problems with them 100% (hairs,soft focus, lack of detail sharpness).Lately my reject rate has gone up and the quality issue is showing up.How to check will reduce rejected experience.I have attached some files please check. Thank you!

Hello, I have recently submitted several AI-generated images of women with their Golden Retrievers. For over twenty years I have been a designer who has been using stock photography of people and their pets. I believe these images have plenty of marketing value, but I don't know the reason for rejection, or how to avoid repeating the problem.

Hello, i would like to separate my images in different accounts, one for illustration and one for photos (currently i have a mix of booth in one account, everything is ai created)Based on this messageIn general, it is possible to create multiple contributor accounts. This is useful if different asset types are uploaded in the different accounts. For example, one account for videos, another account for photos and a third account for illustrations.We don´t recommend creating multiple accounts to bypass the upload limitations and upload the same asset type and similar content in all accounts. This may lead to the accounts being blocked.And on that In addition, you can now submit photo-realistic generative AI images as asset type photos, i.e., content that looks as though it could have been created by a camera, as long as you check the box that it was created with generative AI tools. All other generative AI content should continue to be submitted as asset type illustrations.I co

i have look some of the article regarding the same issueand have followed thembut i still failedi am lost at my own faultplease send help

AdobeStockにベクターファイルをアップロードするとフォントが変更されてしまいます。 どなたか原因をお教えいただけませんでしょうか？   20240118-ap-Metalic_28.pdf / アップロードしたベクターファイル(※) 20240118-ap-Metalic_28.jpg / ベクターファイルから書き出したJPG画像 220_F.jpg / AdobeStockにアップロードした後のサムネイル画像   ※このフォーラムでは、AIファイルでアップロードできませんでしたので、PDFに変換しています。AdobeStockには、AIファイルでアップロードしました。   [アーティストの著作権を保護するため、モデレーターはオリジナルのベクターファイルを削除した。］

I've submitted AI photos to my vector account and created another account only for AI photos, because assets that were in review could not be deleted so I waited until the assets were approved and deleted it. Is it okay to reupload it or will my account get banned?

Hello: I will be concise with my question: is the result of scaling a generative image with AI (1456 x 816, for example) x4 times using Adobe express valid to be accepted by Adobe stock reviewers? Thanks in advance   [Moderator moved the thread to the correct forum]

Hello Community, I am here to post the issue regarding the activation of my account.Please check the below email I received a month ago.After replying couple of times but all went unanswered and I am still waiting and it has been more than a month.Can anybody help me regarding this?

I'm submitting almost 250+ images everyday and almost 120 or 100 images got declined by Adobe is there any impact on my account due to images declaration for example is there my account will block bcz of images declaration usually there's quality issues and soft focus issues occurs help me plzz will my account will ban due to it or not?? 

Did I do something wrong that caused 2 images to be rejected together?Point out the mistakes? please help me. I have attached 4 files please see. 1&2 FILE ACCEPT,3&4 IMAGE REJECTED (QUALITY ISSUES) Any kind of image upscaler app would be good?

Minhas imagens foram recusadas. Alegação:"Durante nossa análise, descobrimos há elementos que parecem estar protegidos pelas leis de propriedade intelectual, portanto, não podemos aceitá-los em nossa coleção. "Detalhe, sou fotógrafo e eu tirei todas as fotos que enviei.Realmente isso é muito revoltante.Algumas das fotos recusadas.Por favor revisem isso direito, nas minhas fotos tem até a minha logo.

Hello every one ,, is the Position per week in Time Frame is per no. of Downloads or Earnings ?

Va beh mi e stato disattivato il mio account Adobe Stock contributor senza un apparente motivo ma okay... so che dovro aspettare settimane, mesi e anni ahahha (spero di no) ma oltre questo o notato un dispositivo sconosciuto collegato dal  6 ottobre 2023 con posizione sconosciuta ma boh... comunque mi potete consigliare altri posti per vendere foto tanto che avevo gia altri contenuti e mi sono trovato la sorpresa con l'account disattivato  grazie

Is it possible to see photos of Adobe administrators who refuse to post photos without deep processing in Photoshop, Lightroom and other programs. But there is a lot of criticism and few facts

If you use Topaz Phot AI I wondering if you could answer the following: When I drag and drop an image into topaz photo AI…does it automatically correct my image without me doing anything else? After I drag and drop and it does it’s auto thing, the next step would be to save the image. Is that correct? Is that it? I don’t need to use the menu on the Right – I just drag and drop, Topaz automatically makes the fixes, so all that is left to do is for me to save the image to the upscale size I want? Other than overriding the automated fixes, what use is the menu on the right side for.

I regularly upload vector files in .ai  format to Adobe Stock and until now was adding titles and keywords manually.I wanted to speed up the process and used Adobe Bridge now to add keywords and titles to my files, but they don´t seem to be added automatically to Adobe Stock when I upload the files via web.I am also unable to use the "Publish" function in Bridge as for some reason it always shows me the error message saying my "files are unsupported by Adobe Stock"... I can still upload the same files manually though. Am I missing something here? How can I make metadata to upload with my .ai files to Adobe Stock?And why Bridge says that .ai format is unsupported? TIA

while the interest seems to be focused on this 'generative al',  I have photos that have been in review over 3 months. are the old fashioned pics gone out of style?