Stock Contributors

Maybe because not everything is exceptionally sharp? But some wors pictures made it through.  

Hi Adobe team, I cannot add my Indonesian phone number (+62) to my Adobe Stock Contributor profile. When I try to contact support through Help Center, it redirects me back to the “Add mobile phone number” page, so I am stuck in a verification loop. Because of this, I cannot upload my designs. I already tried using +62 without the leading 0, different browsers, incognito mode, and different networks. Please help fix this issue or verify my number manually. Thank you.

Ich kann das Land/die Region meines Kontos nicht ändern.   Ich kann das Land/die Region meines Kontos nicht ändern und auch kein neues Konto registrieren.Was soll ich tun, wenn ich keine mehreren Konten haben kann?

When you need to verify the authenticity of Adobe Generative AI (Firefly) assets, use this online inspection tool.https://contentauthenticity.adobe.com/inspect 

No one at adobe is responding to my reports and questions regarding how to remove/report AI images that have not been marked as AI. The following image of a pickle is to me very obviously AI generated/manipulated. https://stock.adobe.com/images/glossy-juicy-dill-pickle-close-up/1489256671 I have never seen a pickle like this in all of my years art directing food. So I just wanted to make sure someone took a look at this artist’s work. Areas to note:  Pickle lacks traditional shape and textures of other images populated in the search  The highlight is reflecting nothing, and reflection locations do not make sense (the upper right and left side would never be lit this way in real life). The bumpy texture does not look natural. Real pickles have bumps that share the same darker color of the peel. These bumps are lighter and look more like “crisp” air pockets than texture on a vegetable.  When reviewing this authors work, I feel they are not marking all of their images appropriately. I

I am i gallery owner. I sold thousands of photos as prints and many of them in really large sizez. your filter has removed more than half of my photos for the quality reason or even intelectual property reason (the photo of the sunny beach with a boat). I am uploading via lightroom but i definitely had better percentage when i uploaded jpg files. Besides if you already decide about a photo you dont want it shouldnt it be marked in lightroom so i dont have to manually check each photo? I am really dissapointed becouse i simply do not trust the artificial inteligency you use. check for example the photo. If not the fact i have seen most of those photos printed out, on liflets, albums, fineart prints i could consider they are not the highest quality but becouse i know those photos i am just simply grabing my head and thinking how can i upload the full set of 4 thousand photographs if it is going to be such a messy job. Seriously its not funny to manually check wich photos you already have

Can someone please tell me why these were rejected for quality issues?I am new to uploading stock photos. I followed the guidelines. I'm confused as to where I went wrong.  

Hello,I submitted AI videos to Adobe Stock and they were rejected with "quality issues". I'm attaching a few examples. Can anyone help identify what might be the problem? Any feedback from experienced contributors is welcome.Thanks!

Photos are being rejected all due to quality issues. These photos are being excepted in all other 4 stockphoto platforms other than Adobe.They just give me quality issue but did not state out any reason.Out of 100 posted, only 1-2 accepted.Can anyone point out what’s wrong with the photo? It seems like wasting time contributing here.,,(I’ve minimized the photo though as the size exceeds the size allowed to be uploaded here)   

The photos I submitted were rejected due to poor technical quality. The statement is rather general and doesn't provide any specifics (because there aren't any). I disagree. The photos were very good technically and compositionally; I'm not an amateur. Their acceptance by other photo agencies also confirms this. I believe Adobe is biased. I have reservations about the evaluation team.

Not sure why this photo was rejected. Any feedback would be helpful. 

First Image2 

Hi everyone,I’m a bit stuck and was hoping to get some advice from the community.I recently uploaded some high-resolution PNG illustrations (8000x8000 px) created in Clip Studio Paint. However, they keep getting rejected for "Quality Issues" citing noise or artifacts.I'm a bit confused because I used an oil-paint style brush to give the lines some character, so there's intentional texture in the art. I’ve even tried uploading files where the edges are absolutely smooth and only the filled areas have textures, but the rejection reason remained exactly the same.I know as a raster file, it won't have the perfectly smooth edges of a vector, but I see a lot of other textured art on Adobe Stock. Is the system misidentifying hand-drawn textures as technical flaws? Or should I be prepping my files differently?Also, since these are just simple line art character sketches without any color fills, would it be better to just upload them as JPGs instead of PNGs? I’m wondering if the transparency mi

Recently, it seems that Adobe uses AI to speed up the review process. Though it has significantly reduced the review time, it has also rejected many very good photos for wrong reasons. For example, I took a few photos of building reflections in the water with a special ripple effect and very high quality. However, Adobe rejected them for quality reasons. Obviously, the AI couldn't tell whether the visual effect was a natural effect or bad photo quality. Has anyone else had a similar experience?

How long did it take you to earn your first $1,000 on Adobe Stock, and what is the most you’ve earned since opening your account?

Hello everyone, My Adobe Stock contributor account has recently been deactivated, and I am trying to understand the reason behind this decision. I would like to clarify that I was not uploading any AI-generated content. My submissions mainly included original designs such as icons and graphic elements, and many of them were approved before the deactivation. At the moment, I have not received a clear explanation from Adobe regarding the exact cause. I would really appreciate guidance from experienced contributors or Adobe staff. Could this be related to: Similar or repetitive content? Style similarities with other contributors? Metadata or keyword issues? I want to understand what went wrong so I can avoid mistakes in the future. Any insights or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thank you

Hello everyone,I have uploaded 535 files (AI generated , vector, JPG & PNG), but only around 300–350 more or less files are visible on my public profile. Most AI-generated images are not showing. Also, my downloads are extremely low (0–4 per month) even though I've uploaded enough quality content.So my question is - Why all approved files are not visibleWhether my content is properly indexed and searchableIf there is any issue affecting my account visibility or downloads.If anyone knows about this issue please help me.

Hello, I would like to ask input on one more comparison. The bird on the left was rejected, but the bird on the right was accepted. Is the problem the slight part of the crest that is out of focus? When I do searches on the stock online, many photos seem to have much less technical quality, but I suppose they are just really cracking down now with a need for perfect shots? Thank you.

I am a new contributor and would really like to undertand the specific reasons for the rejections of the vast majority of my photos. I’m mostly a wildlife photographer, but do a variety of photos, with landscapes and some people. I’d say at least 60-70% of my photos have been rejected, which is quite a blow to the ego! The point of confusion is the (to me)  is the seeming lack of difference between ones that were accepted and ones that are rejected.I was going to upload 4 photos - 2 rejections and 2 acceptances - but I can only upload three. So I will use these for illustration. The top photo of the tanager was accepted, but the wombat and toucan barbet were rejected. I took them with the same camera, did similar amount of processing, and had similar camera settings. Granted these are all animals, but to me they at least reflect the (to me) lack of contrast in quality).I am very tempted to stop uploading to Adobe altogether, but if I understood what the issues are with my photos, perha

I have 11 works like this that were rejected due to violations of intellectual property rules.Could you explain where the violation occurred?   Title : AI Document Icon. File with AI Stars, Smart Content ConceptKeywords: page, content, smart, paper, file, ai, artificial, intelligence, stars, document, digital, data, report, text, paperwork, record, template, form, information, office, business, system, software, application, platform, automation, processing, analytics, technology, innovation, future, productivity, efficiency, workflow, management, storage, archive, creation, editing, generation, tool, service, icon, vector, illustration, symbol, outline, monochrome, label

Hello everyone. I’ve been uploading photos to Adobe for years, taken with different cameras and mobile phones. For the past few months, I’ve only been uploading photos shot with a Google Pixel 7 Pro. I think there’s no need to explain here what this little machine is capable of in terms of the image quality it can produce.The issue is that, as is happening to many others, a lot of my photos have recently been rejected for technical quality problems. Do you think that if I submitted photos taken with a full‑frame camera, for example, I could avoid these rejections? Or is this happening to many people regardless of the equipment they use to take their photos?Thanks and have a nice day

I am pleased to inform you that Adobe Stock contributors who qualified for the Creative Cloud bonus in 2020 can now redeem the bonus by clicking the link found in the blue banner at the top of the Adobe Stock Contributor Portal! You can view details about how to redeem your code here: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/how-to-redeem-creative-cloud-bonus-code.htmlIMPORTANT! If you qualified for a single app, once you click your selection, the selection is permanent and cannot be changed so choose wisely! Don't click the banner until you are ready to see the entire process through. Read the page I linked above first to get an idea of what the means.I have more good news to share! The program will continue through 2021 with the qualification requirements remaining the same as they were in 2020.Stay creative!Mat Hayward

Hello,I’m trying to activate my Adobe Stock contributor account, but it appears to be blocked due to a duplicate account or phone number issue.I contacted support, provided the requested Adobe ID information, and opened a second ticket referencing the original case, but I have not received a response in over a week.Case #: 00482749 (original)Additional Case#: 00486918I opened the second case after not receiving a response to the first.Could someone please help escalate this or check the status? I’m ready to begin uploading content.Thank you.