Stock

It is disappointing to see how increasingly disconnected Adobe seems to have become from the people who actually use its products.Changes are introduced constantly, yet many of them seem less and less aligned with the real workflows and needs of creative professionals.The latest example is Adobe Stock. When I click on a stock asset in Safari, I am now taken directly into AI Studio instead of being able to properly inspect the asset itself. If I want to use AI Studio, I am perfectly capable of making that decision myself.By forcing me into AI Studio, Adobe is actually taking away information and functionality that is relevant to my work — such as reviewing the asset details, the contributor, and other images from the same series before deciding whether an asset is suitable for a project.This is becoming symptomatic of a bigger problem. Adobe increasingly feels like a product-driven organization pushing features it wants customers to use, rather than a customer-driven organization improv

AI Studio has seriously damaged the Adobe Stock search experience. I use Adobe Stock professionally to source images, not to generate or edit them. Previously, clicking an image allowed me to inspect the asset properly and, crucially, browse other images from the same shoot or series. The new AI Studio behaviour removes that workflow and makes Stock much slower and less useful.Please restore the normal asset detail page as the default when clicking a Stock image, or provide an account setting that allows users to disable AI Studio or toggle it on or off. AI tools should be optional, not forced into a paid professional stock-image service.

Hi Everyone,   I'm pleased to share that a filter has been added in Adobe Stock search for generative AI images. You can now filter out generative AI images from your search results, or you can view only generative AI images in your search results, or you can continue to view all generative AI and non-generative AI images in your search. Whatever you prefer, the option is yours to choose!   You will find the generative AI filter in the general filter panel found at the left of the search results.   Stay creative!   Mat Hayward 

Minha conta do Adobe Stock foi desativada. Segui o procedimento por email mas não tive retorno. Não entendi o que exatamente fiz de errado para provocar a desativação da conta e gostaria muito de ter ela de volta, pois estava trabalhando no portfólio desde o ano passado.Gostaria de saber se a reversão é possível, e se sim quanto tempo pode levar?Também acho interessante que o motivo da suspensão seja mais claro, pois o email informa muitas possíveis causas que levam a uma punição, mas ainda não sei quel foi que eu cometi (entendo que nenhuma pois tenho seguido o mesmo padrão de produção de imagens faz meses).

Dear Adobe Stock Review Team,I am writing to respectfully request a re-review of my recently submitted assets , which were rejected under the quality standards category.These submissions consist of specialized geometric patterns, seamless textures, and surface design materials . I would like to highlight that these assets are specifically designed as functional production materials for creative professionals such as graphic designers, textile artists, and 3D modellers who require precise, repetitive tiles and high-contrast surface maps for their daily workflows.While I understand the visual standards applied by the automated and manual review processes, these files are technical assets created to serve immediate commercial and utility needs in surface design.Could you please have a senior moderator perform a manual review on these files? I believe they bring valuable diversity and practical utility to the Adobe Stock catalog.Thank you for your time, consideration, and continued support

I make botanical clipart for stock. Wreaths, pine borders, mistletoe, juniper. Every one has to ship as a PNG with a genuinely transparent background, and cutting them out used to be the worst part of the day. I tried the usual chain: the web tools, then rembg locally with u2net, then BiRefNet, then RMBG. They all failed the same way. A wreath is a ring, and inside the ring there's background that has to go — what I kept getting was a haze in there instead. Not opaque, not clear, a grey-blue smear that looked fine as a thumbnail and looked awful the moment a customer dropped it on a colored card. Pine needles came out as mush. Thin stems vanished, or came back with a colored rim baked in that no amount of levels would remove. Then I looked at what those tools actually do, and it stopped being mysterious. **rembg feeds BiRefNet a 1024×1024 copy of your image, gets a 1024×1024 mask back, and scales that mask up with LANCZOS to your original size.** On a 4096×4096 render that's a 4× upsca

We need better AI filters. Content needs to be reportable for AI use. File: 2085566490 for example, what are the things in pink?  

BonjourJ’ai reçu un mail pour une image gratuite Photoshop mais elle n’est pas gratuite.“Voici votre modèle gratuit pour Adobe Photoshop”Merci de vos réponses

Bonjour.Je viens de télécharger 2 fichiers vectoriels qui ne contient rien car il y a un fichier lié qui n’est pas incorporé…Il s’agit des fichiers : AdobeStock_2079832667 et AdobeStock_2079832532Il provient tous les deux du même contributeur : https://stock.adobe.com/fr/contributor/212732183/gulshan?load_type=author&prev_url=detailLe contenu du portfolio est sans équivoque… que de la génération par IA et les éléments soit disant vectoriels sont de la vectorisation dynamique inexploitable au final…Autant quelque fichiers sont signalés ‘’Généré avec IA’’ mais beaucoup ne le sont pas…Merci de votre aide. 

Bonjour.Je commence à avoir de sérieux problèmes avec les fichiers vectoriels recherchés et téléchargés depuis AdobeStock.Les fichiers sont de piètre qualité par rapport à avant. On se retrouve avec des fichiers généré par IA qui ont été vectorisé ‘’à la rache’’ , considéré comme fichier fait par un utilisateur (donc trompeur) et on se retrouve avec des fichiers comme celui là : 1996584424, 2061766440 ou 2114808533.Il y en a de plus en plus. On ne peut rien récupérer et rien faire dans ce fichier. C’est une bouillie sans nom ! Il y en a de plus en plus et ça fait perdre un temps pas possible !On se sent floué ! [Moved to Stock by a moderator］

Seit heute öffnet sich beim Klick auf ein Bild im Suchergebnis AI Studio.Ich will aber nur eine ganz normale Bildsuche durchführen, wie früher.Ich brauche die Option, weitere Bilder einer Serie angezeigt zu bekommen etc.Wie geht das jetzt?So kann ich mit AdobeStock nicht mehr arbeiten!Ich muss Bilder finden und nicht bearbeiten, dass mache ich in Photoshop.

I downloaded AdobeStock_538890993_Video_HD_Preview earlier this month. And now I would like to download the 4K version, which I cannot find anymore as the video looks to be missing. Is there any way to download it after all?

I used to be able to right click on an image in Adobe Stock to download a comp image which had the image number in the filename. Now, I am unable to even click and download a comp image. How can we do this with the new AI Studio window that comes up when I click on an image now?

Is there any way (aside from posting here) to report individual Adobe Stock files that are misleading/incorrect?  I just licensed this file and downloaded the vector version of it, which was a JPG pasted in an Illustrator file. https://stock.adobe.com/images/delicious-chocolate-cake-slice-with-strawberry-on-top-isolated-on-white-background/1661113016?prev_url=detail

I've licensed an Adobe Stock vector (File# 399343242), but thus far, I am unable to remove the black checkered background in Photoshop or Illustrator. Is this file faulty somehow or am I missing something? Any help would be appreciated!

I shouldn’t have to post on a forum to get this resolved, especially with the rise of Ai and how many times I run into this issue.Anyway, an asset I downloaded from Adobe Stock was listed as an SVG and is not. It is a pixelated rasterized image. File 2061700400Please remove this asset, refund the credit and add a feature on the site to report for this exact issue, instead of just copyright infringement.

Recently downloaded an asset from Adobe Stock (https://stock.adobe.com/uk/images/building-web-icons-in-line-style-hotel-hospital-apartament-city-town-house-mall-coffee-collection-vector-illustration/780136570?prev_url=detail) - this asset has clearly been created from a very poor quality image trace in Adobe Illustrator. These are also not editable strokes. I would imagine that all of the similar assets from this creator are the same.  Adobe needs a way of reporting slop like this. I would also like a credit refund for this rubbish. 

2061136146 Is listed under the Vector Files but it is a jpg inside an .ai Illustrator file. 

Whether it’s a poorly traced or GenAI (spoiler alert it is GenAI), it is unusable as a vector and must be removed or flagged.https://stock.adobe.com/images/amanita-mushrooms-with-autumn-leaves-in-a-forest-during-sunset-vector-illustration/2115581495And the slopper in chief behind this seems to create hundreds of equally unusable images that pollute Adobe Stock and shouldn’t be allowed on here:https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/212965248/creativekamrul?load_type=author&prev_url=detail  

Whether it’s a poorly traced or GenAI, it is unusable as a vector and must be removed or flagged.https://stock.adobe.com/images/scenic-autumn-forest-path-with-falling-orange-leaves-a-beautiful-vector-illustration-for-a-fall-season-background/1668574785 

Whether it’s a poorly traced or GenAI, it is unusable as a vector and must be removed or flagged.https://stock.adobe.com/images/cartoon-deer-standing-in-forest-clearing/2024740267