Build better products with our product team
Good evening I am passionate about video editing from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia And I have an idea to develop a video editing program, which is: Create a tool that cuts the first three seconds and the last three seconds of a large group of videos at the same time without affecting the time duration of each video, only seconds are subtracted from the beginning and the end, for example, a video of one minute and 60 seconds, we cut the first three seconds and the last three seconds to make it only 54 seconds long, and so on, in order to help many people passionate about editing and cinematographers. I hope to see this possible Thank you, my dear development team Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
I am unable to import the new Cinematic video files to Lightroom Classic (updated) from my iPhone 13 Pro Max (iOS 15.0.2). Any tips or suggestions? Thanks!
For better editing and comparison I think a "create a virtual copy" option would be very nice.
Not sure if this is a bug, but when a cloud album is "archived to local storage" and the option to organise is "Copy cloud album structure", the cloud album folder is ignored. So if a cloud album "Test" which is in a cloud folder "Misc" is archived, then only the "Test" part of the structure is created in the local filesystem eg photo archive > Test. Ideally it should be photo archive > Misc > Test to fully recreate the cloud album structure.
I suppose that if we can already use neural networks to create videos, then it won't be difficult to simply add the function of dubbing the audio track into other languages. Considering that we already have a translation of subtitles, we could probably make the necessary changes to them and press something like the "Dubbing" button, getting an audio track in which all participants would be able to pronounce the text from the subtitles with their own voices. This feature has been available for quite some time both as part of subscriptions to paid services and in free tools on GitHub. It's probably time to implement it in our multifunctional video creation tool. It should be added that there is also technology for synchronizing audio with the speaker's lips. However, this may complicate the task and require more processing time. Probably, this function could be added in updates as one of the settings that can be turned on or left off, focusing only on subtitles.
Lightroom (Cloud-based) should have a comparison view between the 2 history versions of a picture like LrC. It'd be helpful for editors to have a view of those side to side instead of pressing the "Show original" button back and forth. Thank you
I suppose this may be in works already, but if not, it would be great to have an option to make the text go into a vertical stack. Please see screenshot as an example:
This would litteraly change my life and save me thousands of editing hours. My little boy and I have a video blog channel and a gaming channel on YouTube. We are way to active and spontanious for lavalier mic use (trust me we've tried)I am big, loud and rite behind the camera; he is little, quiet and further or far away from the camera.I have spent thousands of hours, and still have thosands of hours more editing to do, all sound related editing.I have to splice every single clip, tens of thosands of clips, countless times to turn every thing he says up to level +15, and turn me down to -12/-15 I would absoltley love it if P.P. could recognize his voice, my voice; then work ahead of me turning him up to +15, and turning myself and anyone else in the background down to -12/-15 Then all I would have to do is the video editing which only takes a few minutes thanks to the gpu accelerator we have now adays, and I could crank videos out left and rite effortlessly I would litterally Pay Double as this would be an absolute game changer
Edit>Preferences>Interface>Appearance>Color ThemeCurrently there are 4 options: Charcoal Grey, Grey, Light Grey and WhiteWould love a Deep Dark True/Solid Black option, or perhaps a slider to make the charcoal grey much darker please
Rather than have to remember where the .kys files are stored - could we have a 'reveal preset location in finder' shortcut? Or even an 'import .kys file' option? Thanks
Has anyone in this community thought about pushing Adobe to provide a natural-language search function on Stock? I'm asking as a designer who uses Stock, and would love not to have to fiddle around with awkward keyword searches that often end up taking hours to find a few images. Generative AI doesn't have the quality yet, so I'm not going to waste time with text-to-image, but if I could describe what I'm looking for in the same way someone might write a prompt, and a Sensei-powered algorithm could surface the non-AI images or illustrations that fit... boy, would that save time! Why can't I search for "A quiet Mediterranean beach at sunset with sailboats anchored offshore."? The technology is already out there. A NLP front-end to Adobe Stock, as distinct from text-to-image generative AI (that, honestly, mostly wastes time), would save designers a boatload of time and has the potential to free contributors from the tyranny of keywords.
Previous to 2024.6.1, I could target a timeline track to indicate which track I would like a piece of media copied from a different timeline posted to. Currently the media is posted to whichever track it was on in the original timeline. As someone whose job it is to organize timelines, this is extremely frustrating. Even if I lock all the layers except for the layer I wish to copy to, the clip appears on a new layer above all the other ones, if the layer I indicate is "lower" than its original position in the first timeline. It adds another step to my process which, as I am sure NLE folks will agree, is a bad thing. I am sure there are cases/workflows where this new feature is helpful, but I have yet to run into one of them. This and the removal of fx badge colors are the main issues my coworkers and I have wth this new version.
The feature is very useful to actaully edit with the keyboard. Adobe just thinks we use it only export a clip from the timeline but I use it all the time to select a piece of clip that I just cut, and hit batch delete from the keyboard and move one. No mouse at all, which is what gives speed to my editing workflow. Now, when you mark a clip it does it changing the in and out of the timeline, which is unprofessional if you had already selected one. And another annoying thing is that if you had a clip already selected (with the mouse) when I hit detele it delets that and not the clip I hav supposodly marked. This was a feature that we wre able to do in good old Final Cut 7, ¿remember? So I know it's possible. A keyboard stroke, and you have your clip selected, delete and move on.
Pleae add to the AI NR one slider for a separate additional adjustment of the noise in shadows. I shoot on cheap cameras/smartphone, and this is too much the difference between the noise in the shadows and other areas.If I increase the main slider above to clean the shadows, then the middle tones and lights become "plastic" that I do not want to be.... I want to separately set the overall level, for example, main - 33 and shadows - 70. Now this is possible only by creating layers in Photoshop ... and this does not help in maintaining time ... ② Also, It would be nice to have a Chekbox for shadows slider: (not to redraw the details) so that only noise cleaning works. This is necessary for night shots with noisy shadows when AI is trying to draw/invent too many fake lines in dark places. This effect spoils everything, and makes it worse than the original. this is must have! best regards
Premiere Pro should have options to fix scaling options for 3rd Party plugins in future updates, this is a big issue among many users in the Adobe forums. When opening 3rd party plugins they are often shrinked in the window and unusable, it is rediculous and time consuming trying to troubleshoot, often having to scale the computer display or forcing scaling in the application sacrificng quality and creating bugs in the app. Really impedes workflow and very unprofessional to have as an issue. Please add this to your next update!
I'm trying to edit a video and put in captions, but it'd be nice if Premiere Pro could auto-generate captions from a script I have for the video. Instead, the only feature to generate captions is to auto-generate captions from the audio of the video, which takes much longer and is less accurate than if I wrote a script myself.I found a sort of workaround by following this tutorial, but it doesn't include a way for you to indicate when you'd like the captions to split from one caption's appearance to another. It'd be nice if, whenever there was a line break in the text, a new caption was started. Sometimes, you want one caption to end at the end of one sentence, but it can get tedious to edit the text and timing several times when Premiere Pro automatically cuts off a caption because it's hit a character limit.
Dear Adobe Team,My name is Gabriel Nahum, and I am from Israel. I have been a loyal and enthusiastic user of Adobe products, particularly Photoshop, for a long time. First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude for creating such an outstanding and high-quality software that allows me to bring my creativity to life in a professional and accessible way.However, as a user from Israel, I encounter significant difficulties using Photoshop because the software is not available in Hebrew. I believe that many other users in Israel would highly appreciate the option to work with an interface in their native language. Hebrew, being one of the leading languages in the Middle East, could open up a larger audience for Adobe, as there are users who currently struggle to fully utilize the potential of the software.I understand that adding a new language requires resources, but I am confident that this investment would be worthwhile in the long run and would benefit the growing community of Adobe users in Israel.It would bring me great joy, along with many others, to see Photoshop and other Adobe products available with full Hebrew interface support. This step would significantly promote digital creativity in Israel and encourage broader use of your amazing products.Thank you very much for your attention and for your ongoing dedication to your users. I sincerely hope that you will consider this request positively.Best regards,Gabriel NahumIsrael
Hi there,I use Adobe Media Encoder regularly, and I find the "Match Source" feature incredibly helpful for streamlining my workflow. However, I’ve noticed that this option is unavailable when encoding in AVI format.I understand that AVI is an older container format, and it may not always be feasible to match source settings exactly due to technical limitations. That said, I believe keeping the "Match Source" button available, with some modifications, could enhance the user experience. Here are a few suggestions for how it could work:Adjust settings within the format's limitationsAutomatically apply source settings (like resolution, frame rate, and aspect ratio) wherever possible without violating AVI's constraints.Highlight unadjustable settingsClearly indicate any settings that couldn't be matched due to format restrictions, perhaps by highlighting them in red or using another visual cue.Provide explanatory tooltips or messagesInclude a brief note for highlighted settings, such as "This setting cannot be adjusted due to AVI format limitations."By doing this, the "Match Source" button could remain a valuable feature, even when certain limitations apply. As it stands, the button’s absence when using AVI might confuse newer users or slow down workflows.I’d love to hear thoughts from the Adobe team and other users. Thank you for considering this suggestion!Best regards,hanayuki.
I make large graphics that cover parts of football fields and use artboards to divide up the graphic into smaller sections. Artboard bleed setting similar to Illustrator:Currently working on one that is 8' h x 80' wide. I need to divide this into 10 equal 8'x8' prints that need about 6" of bleed per side. I generally go to illustrator to create the artboards/bleed in there. I'd love to remove that step and have artboards work in PS with bleed settings like they do in illustraor. Remove the auto gap when adding a new artboard:Sometimes I don't need bleed so I use PS to generate artboards/individual prints. When creating each artboard I make one then hit the "+" symbol to the right. When PS creates a new one, it automatically adds a gap between the new one and the old one.,. This gap can turn into a costly mistake. I'd love to be able to edit that gap to 0".Currently I manually drag it back to snap up against the previous artboard. There is no way that I have found to type in a number, just click and drag and that can have unpredictible/dangerous results.
Adobe Character Animator Please make it Turkish, every language is available now, there is no Turkish. Talk to the manager, have him speak Turkish there are more than 200 million Turks. There is no Turkish in most programs
Hello, I have a suggestion, why don't you add author search to lightroom mobile? People will be able to find their favorite authors through Instagram and subscribe to Lightroom Mobile, which has contributed to the growth of the Lightroom community, this could lead to a social network through creativity
Sometimes, I work with multiple cameras, which requires me to handle multiple takes from the same camera. When creating a multicam sequence, Premiere treats every take as a different camera angle, even though the different takes are from the same camera. This results in multiple camera and audio tracks in the timeline, even though the takes are from continuous shooting with one camera. This creates a headache in the multicam sequence because each take is divided into separate blocks in the multicam view while editing on the timeline. One workaround is to open the multicam sequence in Timeline view, where all the cameras and audio tracks are visible. From there, I manually drag the multiple takes onto the appropriate track that corresponds to the correct camera. Afterward, I return to the multicam sequence and edit, as correcting the issue in the timeline reflects those changes in the multicam sequence. However, this can become time-consuming, especially when dealing with multiple cameras and multiple takes. Additionally, some cameras, during long shoots, automatically create separate clips on the SD card. I’ve seen several forums discussing this issue over the years, but no definitive solution has been offered. Would it be possible for Adobe to implement an automatic solution to address this problem instead of relying on a manual workflow like mine? I believe you can assign cameras to tracks using the timecode feature, but not everyone uses timecode. I also understand that Final Cut Pro may have this feature. Although I’ve seen forums discussing this issue, I haven’t seen it directly addressed. (I attached a screenshot of the timeline version of what I am talking about. The screenshot is just a short example of two cameras with multiple takes. divided onto different tracks.) Thank you.
Please watch my screen recording here. The slider only has 7 steps of quality. I want it to have 100 steps (like it used to have a few years ago). Why? I need to export images at a specific file size for my online ads. The large jumps in quality and files size with the 7-step slider don't give me the precision that I need. Everything else in Photoshop gives me precise control.... down to the pixel. So why not also make the "export as" jpg have precision? And please do NOT refer me to "Save for web (legacy)". We don't want to go backward. This simply needs to be standard.
Folks-Am I the only filmmaker and editor alarmed by this? I guess I'm late to this party.The development seems almost criminally shortsighted and should be reversed. It's simply this. Yes, we're all digital creatures now, but many of us have shelves, boxes, libraries with scads of DV and DVCAM original footage stored going back into the mid 90's, and often we acquire new tools to repair and enhance early digital content for future purposes. I often export a ProRes master of legacy tape and ingest it into Topaz Labs Video AI to delinterlace and enhance a transferred clip's image quality to HD standards-- sometimes 4K. It never ceases to amaze me how we can turn the clock back and retrieve great clips, great shows, to becme presentable in modern formats. An example: When needed, I can connect to Premiere Pro V 14.0, invoke Capture, shuttle my Sony DSR-45 deck to select from a DVCAM tape. I log clip names, set timecode, and other fundamental aspects as I go. The project bin is built with ready to cut clips as I proceed. Then I can cut a show on any version of Premiere. All this is still available on a older Mac or Windows device, under an older OS (Mojave). I have two machines for exactly the kind of occurence we're experiencing now. But it's real annoying to switch. If I understand the recent announcement, Adobe has lobotomized itself from that important portion of its corporate brain: CONTINUANCE. Build on what came before, not ejecting it as "not modern." We are not part of a user beauty contest, we are craftspeople, many of whom grew up on this app. We need comprehensive tools to get a variety of jobs done, from old sources and new. Not pushing out old stuff with new stuff. New always gets Old. New is a fleeting marketing aspect, not a lasting value. Function, convenience, good UX. That's where the app's true beauty lies. Hey, we're talking about preserving a compact Capture module backed by a list of compatible Firewire and other deck protocols. There's little space needed. What came before costs NOTHING to Adobe, the investment was made, it worked well, and should hang around because it will remain an asset to tens of thousands of filmmakers, earned its place and should still function, even on a Mac Studio M2 Ultra. Yes, I'm aware there are "outside solutions" to acquire tape material. Even QuickTime Player can take a digital video feed. CAT DV maintains its original tape workfow support in its logging app's Professional Version. But once that transfer is made it has to be imported, integrated into a Premiere Project bin, ready for cutting. I'd rather be a postman. Why lose the capability and convenience of deck control easily achieved from Firewire 800 to USB-C adapter connections, with precise clip-to-clip log and transfer text fields within the app? IMHO, it's plain poor thinking that ignores a user base that grew up on Premiere Pro. Love to hear from other users pro and con. Best as always,Loren S. MillerNeoTron Cinema Group
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.