Build better products with our product team
Probably one of few, if any, that would be requesting Hasselblad RAW support for Lightroom Mobile but I like to work on the go... 100C back isn't exactly quick but I typically work from my phone and photos on servers.
change background so u can have different backgrounds during stream
it would be better and more friendly to use if the ctrl button is removed from the develop module in order to go to next or previous photos
It would be great if the audio keyframes that are written to sub-it tracks during automation with an external sound mixer could be linked to the sequence in some way.When the video sequence has to be extended or shortened after the mixing process, these keyframes slip backwards or forwards in the sequence and the sound mix of, for example, the sub-it track with a narrator is no longer correct. at the moment, the keyframes have to be moved awkwardly using the drawing pen tool, which is unrealistic under time pressure, e.g. for news reports.it often happens that you produce a different version of a report, for example, where only a short passage is inserted or edited. and here it would simply be nice not always have to remix everything.
Hello, Absolutely love new track matte feautres. However, the pickwhip is identical to the parenting pickwhip, and the two can easily be mistaken for one another. If there was a way to differentiate the two through use of color or value, that would be excellent. Thank you for you time!
Present Aspect Ratio of Picture in Library Module for easy reference. I tis very important to be able to quickly scan and recognize the current aspect ratio in addition to pixel dimensions. All that is requied is to create a calculation of pixel Width/pixel Height and show this number as a decimal and/or fraction. THis is critical for ease of reference for print purposes as well as other compositional workflows.
Hi.Through Media Encoder, I am able to export hundreds of videos "automatically." Nice. I would never be able to keep up with a fully manual process.BUT - I need the ability to replace the audio track with our standard track we use on fully produced pieces.We have a consistent video length and use the same audio track every time. I just need to replace the audio track with natural sound with our produced "Radio Spot" track. Our track is :30, the video can run long. The option of using a longer audio track that would automatically duck down at the end of the video track of unknown length would be awesome as well. Obviously, I can do this manually with Premiere, but I really need Media Encoder.
É necessário implementar o AutoSave no CameraRaw. Já chega de ficar perdendo horas de trabalho no referido plugin por causa de queda de energia ou por algum travamento no PC.
This morning when I opened Premiere Pro 24 for the first time, I was dismayed at not being able to find the Capture option in the File menu. Upon contacting customer support, I was told that feature had been retired, and I was directed to the following page: https://helpx.adobe.com/in/premiere-pro/kb/retiring-tape-based-workflows.html#sa_src=web-messaging Here's my problem. As a professional media archivist, I used the capture system frequently in the process of digitizing old video tapes (mostly VHS and U-Matic, sometimes DVCPro) for digital access and storage. The article above seems to think tape-based capture is only for transferring tape-to-tape, which is wrong. There are professional archivists and media professionals all over the country, or all over the world, whose job it is to preserve tape-based media via digitization. Adobe has now effectively abandoned an entire industry because it thinks people don't need this feature anymore. Adobe is wrong. As I write this, I have several dozen VHS tapes at my desk waiting to be digitized, and now I have to come up with another software solution because Adobe evidently does not care about customers like me who do this for a living. Dear Adobe, this was a poorly researched decision, potentially affecting a lot more of your customers than you realize. I am asking for the tape-to-digital capture feature to be restored to the software for video professionals like me who were using it faithfully. Mod note: Title changed slightly.
Hi, I ran into this problem today and went looking for this "Could not synchronize one or more clips in the current selection because a match could not be found" error on the internet. After spending half a night and a break in a bunch of forums, I never found the answer. After that, I just sat down and began to think logically why this could happen in Premiere Pro. And I found the answer, my education as a sound engineer helped in this. So, here are my sources: a live music video filmed with 5 cameras at the same time and an audio master file of the track of this clip with mastering! (those who understand sound know that in pursuit of loudness, the waveforms of modern music tracks are most often monolithic "bricks"). So, having synchronized the cameras with the sound using Premiere and replacing the bad sound from the camera with a clean "brick" on each camera, I tried to create a multicamera using the Create multicam source sequence ... But whatever I did, this error constantly appeared Could not synchronize... And when I returned the original sounds from the cameras, not overloaded by the limiter, instead of the "bricks" - then the synchronization of the multicamera went perfectly! Conclusion! Premiere Pro's own synchronization algorithms are far from being as good as those of the same PluralEyes - during synchronization, Premiere tries to match audio files by waveforms and peaks on them, and when instead of a waveform it analyzes a "perfect brick" - it simply cannot with which to compare the waveform. The same applies to badly recorded, overloaded tracks from cameras: if the limiter built into the camera severely cuts the input sound, Premiere will also have difficulty analyzing such a waveform, so synchronization will end with an error.Don't overdrive your original audio, write at the recommended volume settings, and give Premiere a clean waveform (and less extraneous noise during recording, of course) - and you'll be fine with sync. Sincerely, Vadim. [Moderator note: moved to Ideas due to content of post.]
To manage the Cloud storage, "Archive to local storage" is a great function. However, people tags are lost during the process and it's a shame. Example: I archive an old album to free space, but I want be able to find pictures when I search locally "John Doe". Suggestion: maybe people tags could be changed in normal tagged when archived, so search will be possible and identification work will not be lost. Maybe I didn't find the feature… please let me know Sea also : https://community.adobe.com/t5/lightroom-ecosystem-cloud-based-discussions/does-lightroom-search-find-locally-archived-photos/m-p/14683913#M92201
I was recently had a situation where there was motion in multiple bracked images that I needed to merge with a set amount of de ghosting. I'm not seeing a way to set this amount before applying "merge" to multiple stacks. Also, the resulting HDR image does not appear to be in the collection afterwards and can be difficult to track down from "All Photographs".
Is it possible to map shortcuts for the quick develop Settings in the Library Module? It want to map this littel helpful functions to my midi controller, but there is no way to do this without shortcuts...
I wish there was a feature in premiere where I could highlight all the music in the bin and type in -20 and have it change every single highlighted song to -20 db. Because right now it's a real pain to double click every single song, go into the audio clip mixer tab and change it from 0 to -20. Back in my Avid days, they had a feature that allowed you to change the volume levels upon import. yes i know premiere has some feature to do this in-timeline but i dont want to do it in timeline, i want to do it in bin to affect the original raw song. No i dont want to do it with Audio gain. I hate how it reduces the size of the waveforms. I want a way to change all the audio clips from 0 to -20 without affecting the waveform size. When I do it my way by double clicking the clip in the bin and turning down the audio in the audio clip mixer tab, i can now have the same wavelength patterns that arent reduced in size while having quieter volume levels.
Dear Adobe Team, First, I would like to commend Adobe for continuously improving its products, including Adobe Lightroom. The addition of the ability to import not only traditional presets but also custom profiles (creative profiles) in the desktop version of Lightroom has been a significant step forward. These profiles, especially those built on LUTs, represent the future of color grading, offering far greater flexibility and potential than the classic preset. Moreover, they are crucial for seamless work across both photography and video. For many years, the mobile version of Lightroom on iOS lacked even basic functionality, such as the direct import of presets. It took a decade, but finally, the ability to import presets directly on iPhone has been introduced—a long-awaited and much-appreciated feature. However, as the industry evolves and modern presets are increasingly based on profiles, there is an urgent need for the capability to import profiles as well. This functionality is essential for photographers who need to stay current with the latest tools and techniques. It is somewhat disappointing that in 2024, despite the advancements in AI and neural networks in the mobile version, Adobe has yet to implement a feature for importing profiles or even LUTs. My question is, when will Adobe introduce the ability to import profiles in the mobile version of Lightroom on iOS? This feature is vital for photographers to remain competitive and to work effectively using mobile devices. We sincerely hope that this won't take another decade and that Adobe will prioritize this functionality in the near future. Thank you for your attention to this matter. We are eager to see Adobe continue to lead in innovation and support the needs of photographers worldwide.
I just updated Pr to the lastest version. Before the update when I scroll the middle mouse wheel while having the mouse over the program monitor (the main window where it plays the video), the action was going forward or backward in the timeline like when pressing back or forward key on the keyboard. But now it's zooming the video, which I personally barely use. I thought having it able to scrub throught timeline is much much more useful than zooming, and I hope in the future updates it can be at least added back as an option so we can choose what action the middle mouse does deoends on personal preferences, as oppsed to completely reaplacing and removing it.
The workspaces management options are very limited and needs improving. When I choose to hide workspaces this works when using the workspace button top right, but the menu still shows all workspaces despite hiding them. Surely these two ways of looking at the same list should match? Keyboard shortcuts appear to be assigned to the first 9 workspaces that appear in the list. If we want to use a keyboard shortcut for a custom workspace this needs to be named in a way that forces the required workspace to the correct place in the alphabetical list. if I make a workspace called 1_Jason, it will take over the first keyboard shortcut. This is odd. Why not allow the user to define all keyboard shortcuts, and to manage the workspaces as they see fit. I will never use the Assembly workspace, so would always delete it. I would suggest coding all default somewhere hidden with a restore default workspaces option in the menu. But allow users to delete nd create workspaces as required, and asign what ever keyboard shortcuts they requre.
When manually reducing Noise (not using AI tools), it would be helpful if we had a masking slider similer to what we have when manually using the Sharpening sliders, but reversed in application (holding down the Alt/Cmd key). While using the noise reduction sliders, holding down the Alt/Cmd key white would show for areas in the image with low detail and black with areas of high detail. Recognizing that darker areas are more likely to need noise reduction, perhaps there needs to be two masking sliders, one for detail levels and the other for illuminosity levels.
Dear Adobe, could you please make it possible to access the hand tool functionality via the middle mouse button / scroll wheel. The same way it works in After Effect and all other 3'rd party software. It will excellerate all the workflow.Thanks in advance. 🙂
Dear Adobe & Community, I'd like to ask if Premiere Pro could implement propper VST3 Multi Channel Plugin support for things like WTAutomixer? This is supported in Audition and the plugin does "work" in Premiere Pro but there is one specific bug:When adding the effect WTAutomixer into the Effects Rack of one specific audio Track and opening it, the plugins hows no tracks. Then as soon as playback starts & there is sound, a track appears in the WTAutomixer interface. This is how it is supposed to work. Then when I add the WTAutomixer to another audio track effects rack it also works the same way. However, when removing the plugin from one of the audio tracks, the corrosponding track in WTAutomixer does not get removed. I tried this in Audition, there it works as expected. If the effect is removed from one of the audio tracks, it also gets removed from the WTAutomixer plugin interface. I contacted the WTAutomxier support and they let me know that this is something that is in Adobes hands and the way they handle VST3 multi channel plugins. So, I hope this can be fixed and made so that it is similar to how Audition and other audio work stations handle these types of plugins. Warm Regards,Chris
Could a search option be available for the individual's My library assets? Yes, I could create many categories, but it could be valuable to search assets selected for use later.It saves time, especially if the My Library category has many assets.
Could a search option be available for the individual's My library assets? Yes, I could create many categories, but it could be valuable to search assets selected for use later.It saves time, especially if the My Library category has many assets.
It would be great to have a regional or geographical filter. Cars, trucks, the lane they drive in, etc. are different in the US, Mexico and Canada for instance than in England, Europe, Australia, African Nations....It would be great to add a field for the contributors to share the geographical region the photo was taken in, or the illustration or vector is model for.
It would be great to have a regional or geographical filter. Cars, trucks, the lane they drive in, etc. are different in the US, Mexico and Canada for instance than in England, Europe, Australia, African Nations....It would be great to add a field for the contributors to share the geographical region the photo was taken in, or the illustration or vector is model for.
Does anyone else out there think the interface on the clips in the timeline is starting to become too cluttered, and too unmanageable? There's a lot going on, visually and functionally, with the clips on the timeline these days.- rubber band- keyframes- FX badges- Audio Type badges- crossfade handlesAll have a purpose and I'm not saying they shouldn't be there - and I know some of them can be turned off. I don't know if it's just me, but with successive upgrades and new buttons and badges added to the clip interface, it's becoming harder and harder to simply grab a clip and drag it along the timeline.At a certain level of zoomed-outtedness, it literally becomes impossible. Clicking on a clip no longer selects the clip - it selects one of the afforementioned buttons or badges or keyframes or drag-handles instead. NOBODY'S WANTING TO GRAB KEYFRAMES WHEN THEY'RE ZOOMED OUT THIS FAR!!! Nobody's ascribing audio types when they're zoomed out this far. The only thing people do zoomed out this far is slide things up and down the timeline!!! Personally, I think common sense should prevail. Let there be a threshold beyond which none of these buttons, badges, handles and - especially - keyframes activate. Clicking on a clip selects the clip. Nothing more. If you want to twiddle keyframes or whatever, zoom in to the appropriate scale. I know I can turn keyframes off, but turning them on and off everytime I want to grab a clip is just as annoying as grabbing a keyframe instead of a clip. It's not really a solution. So I wonder, does anyone else in the community have this problem? Would they like to see a simplification of the clip interface when zoomed out?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.