Stock

There is a contributer named "clould" who is producing ai generated art and simply live tracing it and posting it  without labeling as 'ai generated'. most have glaring errors that art per the course in untouched ai images. 90% persent of thier gallery is like thisJazz band with woman singer at microphone and music illustration Stock Vector | Adobe Stockid 814489631

When searching for images of Native Americans, the search engine answers with people from India (Indians?). I think I understand what is happening, but the tagging system needs to be adjusted so that Native American doesn't equal "Indian."

Bonjour, depuis près d'1 mois je n'ai plus accès à ma bibliothèque. Commme cela se fait-il ?Merci d'avance pour votre aide

Another terrible AI image. I'd like to report this image.  The spiral bound on the notepad would not work at all - unusual one to approve:there is a whole series of them 761527764761528517761528267761528261761527769761526780761526433 

The above mentioned asset is supposed to be a multi colored dog image. The file itself contains a linked image file, thus there is only a background. Is it possible to get the correct file? Or a refund for the credit? 

Hello,I was browsing stock images and somehow licensed an image without intending to.  FILE #:  424990726 - It is not a photo I would ever use and must have  accidentally clicked the "License" button while simply browsing on the computer. I think I need help from an Adobe representative to UN-license the unwanted image? I have used many photo library sites before and never had this issue...typically, there is a confirmation step.Thank you in advance for assistance. The image is FILE #:  424990726

Hi, today I attempted to download a mockup, but the file looks different from the preview, could you please fix this?https://stock.adobe.com/es/templates/editable-pouch-bag-mock-up-template-for-business-promotion-presentation-or-advertisement-purpose/553220665 

I was looking for some images of downtown Kerrville to use and came across this one: https://stock.adobe.com/images/old-historic-western-house-with-balcony-and-historic-decoration-in-kerrville-texas-usa/681184783?prev_url=detail Really poor editing (you can tell they tried to edit out the van and didn't have a second photo for reference). Is there a content review team that can take another look at this?

This is the file I wantedThis is the file I got   For everyone's future reference, what is the best way to get something like this resolved?Contacting Chat Support doesn't seem to work - the chat ends without anyone responding.Posting publicly is the best/only way?

Glowing skincare serum being dispensed onto a pristine white plam Stock Illustration | Adobe Stock

I used a credit for a background. The image is a flattened image and the descriptive title is not removable. This makes it useless for a background. Is there a way to get my credit back?

  [moderator changed the subject for clarity.]

Searching for 'women character' models for a project, the asset I found at was: FILE #: 231487514 (Woman architect in suit and protective helmet. Character creation set.businesswomen. Full length, different views, emotions and gestures.) The 'Similar in videos' suggestions are all for explicit adult content. That's some pretty sexist optics Adobe, do better. Searched for on stock.adobe.com via Chrome for iOS

Today has anyone experienced downloading extremely slow?1 stock image file size is 4.8 mb took more than 5 mins... 

I downloaded the stock File#: 675457227 titled "Water electric splash 3d logo reveal fully editable template."  When I download the file using my web browser it gives me an .MP4 video. If I import using my asset library it imports a .MOV file. I have searched Google and the Adobe Community for information on how to import this file in such a way that it is editable. I only find information regarding MOGRT files which I have successfully imported/installed in the past. I attempted to import both the MOV and MP4 files using both Premier and After Effects but no luck.Is there something I am doing wrong?Is the file mislabeled/tagged?If the file is indeed mislabeled is it possible to have my credits refunded?Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I purchased a stock image with one of my credits but it was clearly advertised as a vector file and was in reality a JPEG.This is the id : 519668788I've downloaded other assets from this artist and they were all Illustrator vector files so this was clearly misleading.The description says : Transport icon set with editable stroke and white background. Thin line style of bus, car, truck and train stock vector.What can I do?Thank you!

This bug has been active a few days now. When I click the "more from this series" and "see more" it just takes me back to the previous main search page. Here is an example image for which it did this:https://stock.adobe.com/search/images?filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aphoto%5D=1&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aillustration%5D=1&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Azip_vector%5D=1&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aimage%5D=1&order=relevance&safe_search=1&limit=100&search_page=2&k=mature+fun&search_type=pagination&get_facets=0&asset_id=662885382

Bonjour,un membre de mon équipe est tombé sur une image à caractère pédopornographique en faisant une recherche dans Adobe.stock. Pouvez-vous m'indiquer s'il y a une procédure pour signaler ce type de dérive afin que les images soient supprimées au plus vite ? Voire que leurs auteurs soient sanctionnés ?Merci

I discovered a payment flaw in this adobe stock that allows me to open multiple accounts and get unlimited downloads

I downlaoded an Adobe Vector image and it has this flaw in it when opened in Illustrator.

I recently downloaded an image that claims to be seamless but really when tiled there are lots of little color inconsistencies. Very important while printing! Beware when downloading seamless vectors, I know from experience that converting JPGs to vectors creates these inconsistencies and I think that's what some artists probably do that results in this issue. 

I downloaded an image from Adobe Stock without downloading the preview first.  After importing it into Photoshop I noticed that there appear to be faint artifacts of other watermarks on the image.  I knew this was an AI-generated image before downloading it but I didn't expect to find these additional watermarks on the image.  This makes it unusable. Wanted to report this image for further review.   I'm not concerned about getting refunded but wanted to keep others from making the same mistake. https://stock.adobe.com/images/icing-frosting-texture-seamless-background-close-up-created-with-generative-ai-technology/598401760?prev_url=detail Also, this is kind of a red flag... I was under the assumption that the images generated with AI were using a dataset of other Adobe stock images.  These watermarks make it seem that Adobe stock is stripping images from Google or elsewhere without consent (hints the watermarks).  

Asset-ID: 154816785 Contributor: https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/205003681/onelinestock   @Contributor1 ?

FILE #: 535769840 is a misleading stock asset. It says it has a transparent background but the grey checkerboard background is baked into the video and impossible to remove with After Effects. Would like those 8 credits back.

Hi. This set of icons is uploaded under two different image ID's; #641892173, only available as JPEG and #641892519, available as JPEG *and* AI (as it should be considering it is even presented as editable and an obvious vector graphic). I, of course, downloaded the first one for a project never thinking it was only a JPEG download. Then I saw the other one when it popped up after I checked [vectorized] in the filters.  The producer have uploaded loads of icon sets, so I hope there isn't some sort of hustle going on. It would be a good idea for Adobe to look through so there isn't more double files with different file numbers than those mentioned above.I also would like the credit refunded. Thanks.     [a moderator detached this from an older thread]