『アドビコミュニティフォーラム』に質問/トピックを投稿する方法
A safe, no-judgement place to talk Video-related topics.
新着順
For my new documentary I need some background sounds like a quiet natural (wood) environment with only some birds in the neighboorhood, a heavy war-scene, a tropical night with the sound of crockets, etc.Is there a database which you can recommend?The sounds are meant to enliven a large amout of photo's.(As far as I now, Adobe Premiere Pro doesn't have such a database itself.)
I mad a simple animation that just drops the scale from 100 - 0 with some adjustments to the keyframe graph. I made the transform effect with the motion keyframes into a preset with it set to anchor to the out point so it will always be at the end off the clip. The problem is when I apply the prest the key frames just kinda go wherever in the middle insted of anchoring to the out point. Extreamly frustration when trying to add this on to hundred of graphics for those mind numbing alex hormozi style social media videos. I appreciate any help!
It's been four months and this still sucks. But this is also classic Adobe. Fix what's not broken, and don't fix what is broken. I see a lot of placation and empty promises from Adobe staff who are entirely missing the point. Yes, the new export window sucks and they "missed the mark on this one" but what pisses me and a lot of other users off is that this isn't the first time. This has been going on for at least a decade of implementing new features many users didn't ask for in a half-assed manner, only to back track and tell the community that they're working on it and "taking our feedback seriously." Others in this thread have brought it up too; it's not that we don't like change, it's that we're working professionals, many of us with a decade or more of muscle memory and efficiences in our workflow that we've developed to keep pace with an ever increasing demand for short turn arounds, only for Adobe to change it for seemingly no reason. We don't have the luxury of taking the time
Hi, I am PandaI am a video editor who makes all sorts of videos such as advertisements, trailers, documentaries, reels, shorts, and TikTok. I was using adobe premiere pro 1 year ago using my friend's license who had given it to me. Now I had to switch to DaVinci Resolve because I cannot afford the hefty amount Adobe charges. I really love Adobe software and want to try out 3d and motion effects in after effects. Is there any way that I can use the apps for a couple of months for free and promise to pay later on when I get stable? I am very eager to come back to the place where I belong. Adobe feels like home and I want to come back to it.Thank You-Panda
I've had NOTHING but trouble with Adobe Premiere Pro this entire last month and I'm writing here to say "I've had enough". WASTING entire days online trying to find workarounds and fixes for an application that charges an annoying PREMIUM for a monthly fee -I'm fed up with this garbage and I can't wait to be disappointed by Davinci next. Do better. Please.
I hear talk about Rush being developed as a way to eventually have it become Premiere Pro. Is this also true about Lightroom and Light Room Classic? I agree with the change, I'd just like to know if this is true and how far along are we at the time of this post to make the code used to build "Rush" be the code to used rebuild Premiere Pro...... if anyone knows. I'll understand if I don't get an answer. It's a pretty deep question.
Even though the name Rush resembles something quick, the modern life demands a more complete app; with features like chroma key substitution or other resources. To post to social media we have to always go to other apps whilst Premiere Rush could be way better than CapCut, for example, but simply isn't because it's too short of features.
Talking about HDR, technobloggers claim that HDR is a revolutionary technology that dramatically increases the amount of colour available. The number of colours allegedly looks something like this: If you import an RGB24 screenshot into Adobe Premiere Pro, it will look correct. If you render it in SDR colour space (Rec. 709), it will still look correct. However, if you change the colour space to HDR (Rec. 2100 HLG), the colours will degrade and the image will not look like the original. So HDR technology is a scam that should not be applied in the workplace. You don't in HDR video insert videos containing SDR content, as their colour will look hideous. Why is this the case when a set of HDR colours contains a set of SDR colours?
Hello! I've been on the lookout for someone who can create a custom Premiere Pro extension that will automate specific tasks according to my unique needs. However, I'm facing a bit of a challenge finding the right person for the job.If any of you happen to know someone skilled in developing Premiere Pro extensions, or know where I can look I would greatly appreciate your referral. I'm hoping to connect with an individual or company that can bring my vision to life.Thank you, Jaydub!
I can't think of anything to post and by the way, I have 1 sub.
As the title said, I made short product commercials(college projects), but some of those videos contain copyrighted music. Would it be possible to upload it on Behance if it's a personal project without being copyrighted?
I would be the richest man in the world. Need to save you work? Dont have access to folder. Need to make a new folder to save project in magically works now. Need to render? Render failed. Need to do anything at all? that'll be $50 a month for a crash simulator. Nascar doesnt have as many crashes as premiere or media encoder. You guys welded these programs together with duct-tape and ask for premium prices. Im fed up year after year saying the same things. NO you cant have my PC specs its FAR superior to ANY of your stupid pc minimums that youll passivley say is the problem. Adobe you guys [Profanity removed by moderator]
I'm currently doing video editing using OpenShot, which is a simple editor. I have also used Windows 11 ClipChamp, which has easier-to-use transitions but cannot store its projects easily (they consist of random database entries in memory). I've evaluated several better video editors, but I find them clumsy for making simple edits, like cutting out some long silence when someone speaks and replacing by a fast video dissolve. How can I evaluate Premiere Pro for doing simple edits on a low-powered home computer? CPU is i3-8130U @ 2.20GHz, memory is 4 GB, disk space is 20 GB. These specifications fail to meet the Premier Pro requirements. If Premier Pro really won't work well for simple editing on my computer, Are there any suggestions for an editor that is better than OpenShot?
Cutting docs? See this video for helpful workflow tips. Let me know what you think.
I know a lot of people at Adobe work very hard to make this product work and I'm very thankful for that but its hard for me understand why there is such a high frequency of unstable releases that make it past beta. What is the point of beta? These are major bugs too, not small things. I've come to realize you should never upgrade to a new version of premiere unless its at least at xx.2 or higher. Too bad the marketing department prefers flashy, buzzy and mostly useless features in a new version over just simply a 'stable release'.
I'm moving on, it's been 20 years of the bugs just getting more insane and time consuming. Wish I would have jumped ship earlier. Premiere has cost me countless hours of dealing with its totally mysterious bugs. Honestly, I'm an idiot for sticking around this long. Should have realized it back when I was making Youtube videos to share my solutions for inconceivable bugs after I found a solution. Sunk cost fallacy I guess. I think my favorite bug is how changing your audio hardware output device fixed a bug where your program window only showed black. Mod note: The title of your post was changed to reflect the issue. Content was edited slightly to provide context. Thanks.
I have accumulated about 500 hours of editing on three different softwares including Adobe Primere in which I underwent 60 hours of training. Until now I edited as a hobbyist but the business I am establishing is starting to gain momentum and I have to make a decision. This is not the (big) cost difference with the subscription model. If things were working smmothly I wouldn't be looking for a replacement.I got lots of frustration with Primere as a beginner and it's clear that learning a new Editing software will take valuable time. Perhaps it's a corporate logic according to which the user needs to experience the ecosystem and instill loyalty to the design language on the platform (Like Google, FB ads systems) The bottom line is that this is the most unintuitive interface among all the editing programs I've come across as a hobbyist alongside the glitches and complications I've experienced. What I do want to understand - espcialy from you - the more experienced, is whether there are a
I am new here and would like to edit videos with my brand new green suit.NO CLUE How to...Thank you for your help!
It's ridiculous how buggy Adobe is...they don't like an answer, they simply delete it and just make their software more awful. I've moved to Davinci as it's so buggy and crashes constantly. This is how companies lose customers by never listening to customers. It's gone downhill honestly since around the time they switched to a subscription base.
I have to make a video for my friend's birthday party and now I'm wondering where people get the music from. I heard some websites but would like to have other options. If I have to purchase a plan, that is not an issue but want to make sure I do not violate any copyright issues.
The more I search, the more I see a lot of customers who are dissatisfied with any or all 3 of the above brands. Which one would you use to make a YouTube animated cartoon about a rock band? Or what product made by Adobe, Blender, or Autodesk do you recommend? None of them?Thanks!
Video has BOOMED over the past 3 years.I'm willing to bet that Premiere Pro etc have NOT seen the same explosion in sales.Why?The interface across Adobe products lacks harmony.I have a small video and all I want to do is crop it and output the cropped area into a new video.With Premiere Pro, you need a degree in cinematography.Same operation on an iPhone etc?2 seconds.Crop to are and output - no need to worry about the exact size etc.Also, having deep knowledge of one Adobe product (say, Photoshop) will do you NO GOOD when it comes to Premiere, Illustrator etc.It really feels like a bunch of disparete products have been bolted together for £600 a year 😞
The silence is deafening... Mod note: This OT post was branched from a bug report about the Premiere Pro Team's lack of a response to a User Voice bug report about "fixing" the Import and Export Mode UIs. Thanks for understanding.
With CRTs now redundent how import are the acion and title safe areas?
Yes, because we all know how terribly effective the UserVoice is for having our concerns promptly addressed.
Remix with Firefly Community Gallery
Thousands of free creations to fall in love with and remix in Firefly.
すでにアカウントをお持ちですか?ログイン
アカウントをお持ちではありませんか? アカウントを作成
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.