Creative Cloud desktop

Apparently only a ETLA contract type can run reports and automate them. We have a government contract and is the only contract we can use….Why other large license contracts do not have this “feature” already is beyond me. I can go in and manually export to a csv, but cannot do a report for it. Let alone have it run monthly or quarterly and send to our admin team. Please put this on all contract types, it makes zero sense to not. Even a personal license type should be able to get their license use made and automated for their records.

We use Adobe at our nonprofit organization and need to provide the invoices to our finance department. It would be really helpful to receive these automatically via email, so I don't need to take the time to log in and download them/email them manually every month.

Need a way to hide the Benefits tab in the Creative Cloud Desktop app. We don't want our users to be able to see all the miscellaneous items in our enterprise plan but what is more recently frustrating is that there are “Partner perks” advertisements listed now, such as redeeming 3 months of LinkedIn Premium which should not be shown for an enterprise level license. We have tried editing the ServicesConfig.xml to append “BenefitsPanel” to “False”, similar to AppsPanel but it appears not supported in the same way.

I’ve been extremely frustrated by misleading Adobe Stock graphic descriptions. This probably just applies to vectors. The platform is starting to be OVERRUN with AI-generated graphics claiming not to be AI. These typically look great on the preview, but once you download them, zoom in, and try to edit them it’s extremely obvious that they’re AI. Mostly because they’re always put together in a sloppy way that’s hard to edit, and don’t look nearly as good close up. I have on numerous occasions downloaded 20+ assets before I could find one that wasn’t AI, despite having the “exclude generative AI” filter on. Additionally, I’ve downloaded a ton of icons that claim to have editable strokes but don’t, and various graphics claiming to have editable text that don’t. I can’t even imagine how frustrating this must be for people who buy download packs rather than having a subscription. I understand that your team probably doesn’t have time to review every asset that gets posted, but it seems that

Since the team needs a huge bunch of people arguing and voting, maybe “just another request” will do.I can’t afford replacing my whole workstation, I have friends in the industry that don’t have this money either, and they use microsoft only for the Adobe suite (photoshop, illustrator or indesign, mostly).We pay for your product, and our workstation’s OS should not be an accessibility issue.You already support Mac and Windows. Linux is just a few steps further.We’re using Adobe suite mostly because, so far, other products are “not enough” (yet, be aware of that).If you don’t keep up with the pace where it’s going, people will migrate to another tool.I already have some friends that ditched Photoshop in favor of Affinity (and it’s FREE dang it). The change was hard, but they made it. Entire companies did, which is quite impressive too.On my side, I’m planning to work on requesting the Affinity team to make changes that will make it “closer” to how Photoshop works, for now, because it’s

As a Creative Cloud individual plan subscriber, I frequently need to run Adobe applications on two of my own computers at the same time. This is not an account-sharing situation — I am the sole user. The need arises from a real workflow limitation: when rendering or exporting a heavy project on one machine, the device's resources are fully consumed, making it impossible to continue working on other tasks on the same computer.Creative Cloud is marketed as a professional suite of complementary applications. However, the current licensing model restricts active use to one device at a time, which directly conflicts with how professional workflows operate across multiple machines.I am not asking for the ability to share my account. I am asking Adobe to reconsider the policy for single users who own multiple devices and need to run complementary tasks concurrently — such as rendering on one machine while editing on another.This is a genuine productivity need that the current licensing archit

Hundreds have people have requested native support for Linux (not cloud software - local installs) but IMO it deserves a renewed look specifically now because of the end of windows 10 support. Older Windows 10 computers without upgraded TPM cannot move to Windows 11, and the remaining best option is Desktop Linux. However, for creative users this will would be a lot easier with support from Adobe for CC on Linux. The next best alternative is to move away from Photoshop and CC altogether and to move to other softwares. This is not an idea solution for Adobe nor for customers, and this is something many people have been asking for over a rather long time. ...if there was ever a right time for this, it is now. 

Microslop is literal torture to use, and inhibits the human souls ability to be creative. Mac is fine I guess, but doesn’t let us choose the graphic card, nor build custom beauties. Linux is the way.Just make creative cloud run on the penguin already. Thanks

To update the creative cloud apps  installed in a machine - Currently we need to launch the creative cloud desktop suite, and click on ‘update all’. It would be great to have a feature where we can update all the creative cloud apps via a command line, rather than the need of user intervention to launch the creative cloud desktop suite and click on ‘update all’ Hosting a dedicated server just to manage the adobe updates or packaging each creative cloud app (few gbs) and deploying it over network -  do not seem to be a feasible solution.

There seems to be no way to either rename a file if necessary, especially once it has been signed. Nor does there seem to be an option to mark/ tag/ colour code a file for sorting. The latest update has removed or reworked some features and it has made it difficult for us to catalogue/ index our documents other than by user. The ‘notes’ option is a temporary fix but it isn’t ideal when it means we would have to do it to every single file in our database and code it through notes which is incredibly time consuming.