Build better products with our product team
Many of use use expressions all the time, but the tools for writing those still feel like a beta version. The CTI overlaps the expression, the expression is contained in the timeline, which can cause confusing situations, errors are not positioned in the right location etc.How great would it be to edit expressions in a separate panel, with a and modern clear UI?
It would be such a great idea and an amazing time saver if you could choose a subject for the Auto Reframe to focus on when there is multiple people in a shot, especially in a podcast setting or something.
I've been struggling with Premiere Pro's built-in audio synchronization tools and honestly, it's quite disappointing. Even with clearly matching audio sources (camera mic + external recorder), Premiere often fails to sync properly, or only syncs partially, creating messy staggered sequences.Meanwhile, PluralEyes 3, a tool that I use since 10years, still does a significantly better job. It syncs faster, more accurately, and with less manual tweaking.Why hasn't Adobe improved its audio sync functionality to match or exceed what PluralEyes has been doing for almost a decade?I just want to be able to place all my video and audio clips on a single timeline, select them all, right click and choose synchronise...Are there any plans to improve this in the near future?Thanks in advance!
Lightroom Ver. 9 Lightroom doesn't seems to take into account the time zone when I want to correctly rename my pictures using Date (YYYY-MM-SS HH-MM-SS). My local time: UTC -5 Time Zone defined correctly in my camera Time captured of a picture shown in Lightroom info panel: Novermber 9 2005 at 14:28:16, When I want to rename that same picture Lightroom renamed it as 2025-11-09 19-28-16 I subsenquently tried to rename the same picture with Lightroom Classic: Classic renamed it correctly as 2025-11-09 14-28-16. Thanks Normand Cloutier
Add ability to lock caption tracks as mappable command
After installing the latest release of Lightroom Classic 7.4 I'm unable to unmark my favorite folders. In other words, folders that were marked as favorites before the latest release can no longer be unmarked. I can, however, select a folder that was not a favorite before release 7.4 and mark it and also unmark it as a favorite. I use this feature a fair amount so I'm pretty sure this issue started after the latest release but I cannot be sure. Thoughts? Seems like one of those pesky software bugs to me. I'm an experienced user so I do not think this is some type of user error. The catalog is my master catalog and has about 600,000 images. I did not have any favorites marked in my sub catalogs before the release. They work fine but, again, the problem seems limited to the folders that were marked as favorites before the release.[Update: All of the reports here except one can be explained by the confusing design of LR's "favorite groups". See Robert Somrak's post and John Ellis' post. Thus, this topic is marked as an Idea, rather than Not A Problem, to capture the concept that the UI design is very confusing.Patrick Philippot identified a bug where right-clicking an unselected folder creates two folder groups. It has been forked into this bug report.There's another topic expressing similar confusion. I'm not going to merge the two, since that will hide all the useful replies.- John Ellis, 3/10/20]
Gday all.I would like to see an inclusion of a Fourier (pattern suppression) Filter in Photoshop.Is extremely useful and have had years either using a bulky plug-in solution and now swapping over to Photopeia just to acces an easy filter.Please Upvote if people support.Please consider AdobeCheers Bob
I would like to restore the old style or visual appearance of the Fade In/Out transition in Premiere Pro 2025 and 2026.
Sometimes the (great) "select subject" tool does not get the subject quite right, and I will need to refine the subject selection with other masking tools (brush, color range, etc). I will give a name to this refined subject mask, such as "my custom subject". I wish I could subsequently refer to that mask, when doing substractions or intersections with other masking tools (as if that mask was a variable). Here is an example scenario that I am going through ffrequently: 1/ I use select subject 2/ I refine the selection, and name it "my custom subject" 3/ I do the treatment I want on "my subject" (usually I increase the texture a bit). 4/ I want to correct hot-spots created by my flash on objects brighter then the subject: I will create a radial mask, with the intention to reduce highlights, but I don't want highlights reduced on my subject. Feature request: I wish I could substract "my custom subject" from the radial mask, the same way as I can click "substract" and then pickup "subject", or "sky". Why this would be valuable to me: currently, in my above scenario I will spend a lot of time re-finding the subscracted subject, since "select subject" didn't properly identify subject edges in the first place.
It would be great if there was a way to link a Pixelfed account and directly post to it.
Since version 14.4, when a user enables the “Use Smart Previews instead of Originals for image editing” option, and are editing an image where both the originals and Smart Previews are available, they may be shown the following message when they edit an image: You have enabled "Use Smart Previews instead of Originals for image editing" in the preferences. When using the latest Al features, it is highly recommended that you always work on Originals. For best results disable this preference. A better implementation for this is to automatically load the originals when needed, rather than telling the user to disable “Use Smart Previews instead of Originals”. For instance, if the user attempts to use an AI tool that works better with the originals, and the originals are available, Lightroom should automatically load the original and use that. The user should only be warned if the originals are not available, telling them that the tool might not work as well on a Smart Preview. Lightroom already does this when exporting: the originals are always used regardless of setting unless they’re unavailable, in which case the user is warned about using Smart Previews to export. The advantage from an end-user that finds the “Use Smart Previews instead of Originals for image editing” feature useful is that they could make basic adjustments using the Smart Preview first, taking advantage of the improved performance, and then Lightroom will automatically switch to the originals when they need to use an AI tool. This is a much more seamless experience than asking the user to turn off a setting they find useful. Currently, the workaround to use the originals without turning off the “Use Smart Previews instead of Originals for image editing” feature is set the zoom to 100%, which will cause Lightroom to load the original for pixel-level editing. It’s doable, but the user needs to know about this first, and it seems to make more sense for Lightroom to just load the original automatically.
自動文字起こし、キャプション作成を一度行うと再度できない。具体的には、インアウトの文字起こしで一部分だけで文字起こし、キャプション作成した。その後別の箇所でも文字起こししようとしたが、どうやらそれはできないらしい。 一度タイムライン全ての文字起こしをしてから消していく方法もあるが、時間がかかるし面倒だ。必要な箇所だけちょくちょく文字起こし、キャプション作成を追加していける編集方法に対応して欲しい。 それとも何か方法はあるのでしょうか。
Deveria vim com mais recursos baseado no premiere para desktop adotado para celular como por exemplo o recurso do monitor de origem onde tem total controle de corte de inicio fim e de tempo, recurso usado em concorrentes como lumafusio, deveria ter presentes de curvas de velocidade como tem novamente nos concorrentes como capcut! Falata muita coisa para ser bom,poderia implementar abas distintas por exemplo aba de corte ai nesta aba abriria um legue de ferramentas de corte como por exemplo dividir, corta da esquerda para direita e vise e versa, aba somente para audio e suas distintas ferramentas etc ou seja deveria ter varias abas e cada umadelas suas respectivas ferramentas para uso destindos
why in auto caption's language we don't have persian ?
When Generative Fill runs out of monthly AI credits, Photoshop just shows the “Generating…” window and then closes without any explanation. It looks like the feature has failed or the app is broken. Please add a clear on-screen message (for example, “You’ve used all your generative credits — resets on [date]”) so users understand what’s happening instead of wasting time troubleshooting. This small UX improvement would save a lot of frustration.
This will help prevent making adjustments to the a previously highlighted clip and speed up workflow.Is it just me because I am transitioning from Avid? I will adjust the color on a clip for example, then mouse to another clip. After making an adjustment I realize that I didn't highlight the new clip. I then undo, and click the new clip for adjustment....big time waster. If there is already a setting for this, please let me know. Thank you.
Problem StatementCurrently, exporting multiple individually edited clips from a Premiere Pro sequence with all effects and color corrections applied is unnecessarily time-consuming and inefficient. Users who need to export dozens of edited clips must either:Manually set In/Out points for each clip and export one by oneUse Project Manager (which only exports unedited source files)Manually nest each clip individually and export separatelyRely on third-party scripts or workaroundsThis workflow is particularly problematic for:Content creators managing social media clipsEditors delivering multiple revised assets to clientsPost-production teams working with multi-clip projectsAnyone who needs to deliver individual edited clips rather than a full sequenceProposed SolutionFeature: "Batch Export Individual Clips"Add a native function that allows users to export all clips on a timeline as separate files with all edits, effects, and color corrections preserved.Implementation SuggestionsOption 1: Right-click Context MenuSelect multiple clips on timelineRight-click → "Export Selected Clips Individually"Opens batch export dialog with options:Export preset selectionAutomatic naming based on source clip names or custom naming patternDestination folder selectionOption to include handles (extra frames before/after)Queue all to Media Encoder or export directlyOption 2: Enhanced Project ManagerAdd "Export Edited Timeline Clips" option to existing Project ManagerDetects all clips on selected sequenceExports each with effects applied (not just source files)Preserves clip names automaticallyBatch processes to destination folderOption 3: Batch Nest FunctionSelect multiple clips on timelineChoose "Nest Each Clip Individually"Automatically creates nested sequences for each clip with unique names based on source filenamesProvides option to immediately batch export all nested sequencesMaintains organized project structureKey Features NeededAutomatic Unique NamingUse source clip filenames by defaultSupport custom naming patterns (e.g., "ClientName_ClipName_v01")Sequential numbering optionMaintain original file naming conventionsPreserve All EditsExport with all effects, color corrections, and adjustments appliedRespect clip trimming and in/out points on timelineInclude nested sequence contentsApply sequence settings (frame rate, resolution, etc.)Batch ProcessingQueue all clips to Adobe Media Encoder for background renderingProgress indicator showing current clip being exportedError handling for failed exportsPause/resume capabilityFlexible Export OptionsChoose export presets per clip or apply one preset to allSelect destination folderOption to organize exports into subfoldersInclude/exclude specific tracks (video only, audio only, or both)Use Case ExamplesExample 1: Social Media Content CreatorEdits 30 short clips on one timeline with color grading and effectsNeeds each exported as individual MP4 filesCurrent workflow: 30+ minutes of manual exportsWith feature: 2 minutes to set up, automated batch exportExample 2: Commercial EditorDelivers 15 different cut-downs of a commercial to clientEach needs specific color correction and effectsCurrent workflow: Manual export of each version with careful namingWith feature: One-click batch export with automatic namingExample 3: Event VideographerColor corrects 50 ceremony clips on one timelineNeeds individual ProRes files for client archiveCurrent workflow: Hours of repetitive export tasksWith feature: Quick batch export while working on other projectsBenefitsTime Savings: Reduces hours of manual work to minutesReduced Errors: Eliminates mistakes from repetitive manual processesImproved Workflow: Allows editors to focus on creative work, not technical tasksProfessional Efficiency: Matches competitor features in other NLEsBetter File Management: Automatic naming ensures organized deliverablesCompetitive ContextOther NLE platforms (DaVinci Resolve, Final Cut Pro) offer more streamlined approaches to exporting multiple timeline clips. Adding this feature would bring Premiere Pro to parity and enhance its appeal to professional editors.Priority LevelHigh - This addresses a common pain point across multiple professional use cases and would significantly improve editor productivity.Additional Enhancement: Batch Nest Individual ClipsAs a complementary feature, add ability to:Select multiple clips on timelineExecute "Nest Each Individually" commandAutomatically creates separate nested sequences for each selected clipNames them based on source filenames or custom patternOrganizes in Project Panel folder structureThis would support the export workflow while also providing organizational benefits for complex projects.Thank you for considering this feature request. Implementing efficient batch export functionality would significantly improve the daily workflow of countless Premiere Pro users.
It is so bad that your lovely software dont give you the best quality and it will be more difficult for you when you are a creator or gamer which you should upload your videos. i recognized that primier pro export engine is not that much good (my eyes are so sensitive ) When I watched my video, I noticed that there were tiny square pixels dancing around, mostly in the corners of the image in the dark parts of the video, like the night and the blue sky, which I think is due to the color weakness of Premiere, which gives a messy image. However, under the same conditions, the same video was output with the same bitrate with a graphite card with VBR 1 pass, and what was more interesting was that no square pixels were visible and a completely clean image was displayed, even in motion. I want Adobe to design a new output engine that gives better quality than DaVinci and at the same time is fully compatible with all types of systems. I used various Premiere plugins, including After Codecs and Vol..., but I think there is a weakness in Premiere's output.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.