Skip to main content

Filter by idea status

10000+ Ideas

Layer Duplication RevisedOpen for Voting

There is an issue with how layer duplication currently works, and I got myself confused. However, an Adobe employee suggested submitting this as a new Idea. The IdeaEither make the duplicates appear under the original by default, or create a checkbox that enables this behavior in the Properties. Alternatively, add a separate command/hotkey (e.g., Alt+D). It would be even better if users could also specify how many layers to duplicate, perhaps on a dedicated panel/tab. Additionally, please add the missing condition check that causes the issue. The IssueThe issue impacts the attached Effects that contain pulldown attributes for layer selection (propertyValueType == 6421), e.g., SetMatte or CC Composite. If that property points to its host layer (i.e., self, index n) and the layer gets duplicated, the host layer moves one position down to index n+1. Yet, the Effect still points to index n, not n+1, which breaks the behavior of the Effect. How Will the Idea Help My Workflow?When I am setting up one layer that I plan to duplicate (e.g., 100 times), it requires testing the crowd behavior, such as for motion graphics or particle simulations. With this change, my layer, where I am doing all the expressions, will stay put next to other top layers containing controls to those expressions, not drift away.Applying the fix would also save me the time of going into every pulldown for every layer and changing it to self for every test I make, which amounts to a lot of time saved. It would be much more convenient to have this feature integrated and fixed by default, rather than relying on a custom-written script, which I resorted to out of desperation.A call for action: if you feel this feature might improve your workflow too, upvote the post, please!

Reiterating the Need for Artist Autonomy in Photoshop's Generative FillOpen for Voting

Hello again, Adobe Team and Creative Community,I wanted to revisit a topic that I feel is critical to our work and rights as creators using Adobe Photoshop—specifically, the issue of censorship within the generative fill feature. My previous post aimed to ignite a conversation around this, and today, I'm here to emphasize a crucial point: the responsibility and liability of content creation rest entirely with the artist, not with the tools they use.Historically, the tools provided by Adobe have been just that—tools. These are means by which we bring our creative visions to life, whether they're simple sketches or complex digital artworks. The principle has always been clear: what we create and how we use these tools are our responsibility. This is no different with the advent of generative AI technologies. If a creation is deemed inappropriate, the onus is on the creator, not the tool used to make it.By restricting the capabilities of generative fill, Adobe shifts from being a provider of tools to an overseer of content, an unnecessary and unwanted expansion of role. This not only stifles creativity but also sets a concerning precedent where the toolmaker becomes accountable for the user's artistic expression. This is neither practical nor sustainable, especially in a world where artistic mediums and tools are ever-evolving.It’s important to recognize that bad actors will misuse tools regardless of the safeguards in place, and penalizing the entire artistic community for potential misuses is neither fair nor effective. Instead, empowering artists to use tools responsibly, providing education and promoting ethical use, is a more constructive approach.Adobe has the opportunity to lead by example, demonstrating trust in the creative community by rolling back unnecessary censorships. Let's ensure that Photoshop remains a tool that offers limitless possibilities, not limited permissions.Thank you for considering this perspective. I hope we can move towards a solution that upholds the true spirit of creativity and freedom.