Connect with creators in the official Stock community.
Recently active
Photoshop27.7版本跟27.8版本更新後以下這功能都故障1.轉存為網頁用Shift+Ctrl+Alt+s畫面無法按快捷鍵ctrl+縮放畫面2.轉存為網頁用Shift+Ctrl+Alt+s畫面存過gif後,下一次選擇存jpg就無法存成jpg格式了永遠只能存gif
STEPS TO REPRODUCE1. Select a fully completed asset with the title, keywords, and category filled in and a green checkmark displayed.2. Confirm that the Submit button is green and active.3. Click Submit.RESULTThe click is registered. The telemetry event "show-content-submission-dialog" is sent, and /log/event returns HTTP 204.However:- the confirmation dialog never opens;- no moderation submission request is created;- the asset remains in Uploads.The HTTP 204 response belongs only to the telemetry request. It is not a response from the moderation submission endpoint.CONSOLE ERRORUncaught (in promise) TypeError:Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'find')at h (main.a6ec8041f56484dbcbcb.js:14:85808)at A (main.a6ec8041f56484dbcbcb.js:14:92090)ROOT CAUSE OBSERVED IN THE DEPLOYED BUNDLEThe failing production function executes logic equivalent to:function h(e) { let t = a[e.language || 1]; let s = new Set(e.keywords); return !!t.find(keyword => s.has(keyword));}During rep
Eu estou tentando desde ontem editar uma foto no no aplicativo e todas as vezes que eu acesso a foto para editar ela entra e sai sem eu poder fazer nenhuma edição nela e eu tô tentando desde ontem
Hello everyone,I recently submitted this AI-generated image to Adobe Stock, but it was rejected for Quality Issues.I have carefully checked the image, but I am unable to identify the exact problem. Could you please review it and let me know what specific issues you notice?I'm especially interested in feedback on: Image quality AI artifacts Anatomy or hand/finger issues Lighting and shadows Clothing details Similarity or any other technical problems I would really appreciate your honest feedback so I can improve my future submissions.Thank you very much for your time and
This photo is not Memphis, TN. (Image 234273850).
Adobe Stock really needs to implement a Ratings System so WE can provide feedback on Bad Stock Images, so others can avoid downloading the same file. The Ratings Systems a simple 5 star system with comments section would serve to help the monthly subscribers, but also be a warning to content providers that you can't just upload pure crap. I run across so many vectors that once you download and open the file you can tell it was nothing more than an image conversion from something already on the web. We download vectors from Stock assuming it will be an original. AI has only made things worse, many files are not at print resolution and should be labeled as such or at least with ratings I could read the reviews. There is no way Adobe can monitor the quality of the ever growing library, we should have a way to help police the quality. Ratings are such a common things, not sure why you have not implemented it already.
I took an image showing multiple characters in that image, duplicated the image applied making on the top layer selecting the person of interest. Applied Black & White effect on the lower layer. Next, I took an adjustments layer and applied an effect called Posterize time effect and as soon as I applied it the masking behaves unpredictive.With Posterize time activated.Posterize Time Activated Posterize Time De-activatedTroubleshoot: 1. I tried to put this posterize effect on nested sequence of the two layers.2. Without Nested sequence adding and adjustment layer on the top.Nothing works.
#2025683039This image needs to be reviewed.
I purchased 2 images and selected the SVG file format. The SVG file format has always been scalable images and can be opened in Adobe Illustrator. When i opened these in Adobe Illustrator, they are just rasterized images and have no vector qualities, making them less than useful. Why would they say they are SVG if they are just rasterized images? They both had the option to be JPG or PNG. I chose SVG thinking they would be scalable vector images when opened in Illustrator. They are not.File names:AdobeStock_2079068556.svgAdobeStock_2079068803.svg
Single icon that’s part of a larger icon set that is NOT labeled as Ai-generated in the art bio.I’m wondering why Adobe is accepting this poorly made Ai slop as premium assets, and what are they going to do about a better filtering and quality control system? This specific icon is part of a larger icon set available on Adobe Stock, there is no mention of Ai being used to create this asset and no other Ai tags in the bio but this is VERY clearly an Ai asset as you can tell by the inconsistent line work in the icon itself. We are paying for premium assets, and this is not it. As a graphic designer, I do not appreciate spending time searching for something, downloading it, applying it to my project only to find out on closer inspection that it looks like *this*. Ya’ll charge way too much for your subscriptions for us to except this crap. And it’s only going to get worse as more and more “artists” and “designers” discover and use Ai. This is not a premium asset. This IS Ai generated and ne
as mentioned in the subject line. An extra filter for vectors with editable stroke saves a lot of time and unnecessary purchases. A clearer filter function would be desirable anyway, as images/vectors are now always... are displayed that have nothing to do with the search term. So maybe a field: exclude images... or something similar. An AI search plugin that recognizes the content shown and then assigns it correctly would certainly be helpful here, so that you don't always have to rely solely on the keywords used by the creators, making a quick search obsolete. PS: when I entered the title, no corresponding post came up..if there is one here: sorry.
Hi everyone,I'm hoping someone here can point me in the right direction. Back in 2018, I purchased several image licenses through Fotolia. At the time, I never migrated my Fotolia account to Adobe Stock, and I no longer have access to the original Fotolia login.I now need to provide proof of license for one of those images (an image rights agency has contacted me and requested a dated license record, e.g. invoice or download history). Unfortunately, I have no way of accessing my old purchase history at the moment.My questions:Is there still a way to recover or access an old Fotolia account and its purchase/download history today? Can historical Fotolia licenses be transferred or linked to an existing Adobe Stock / Adobe ID account after all this time? If self-service is no longer possible, which Adobe support channel is the right one for this kind of historical license retrieval? Is there a dedicated contact for former Fotolia customers? What information should I have ready when contac
A majority of this contributors images are clearly made with image trace and being billed as, “Architectural Floor Plan Symbols and Furniture Icons Vector Set for Interior Design, Blueprint Drafting & Real Estate Marketing.”https://stock.adobe.com/contributor/212180865/muhammad?load_type=author&prev_url=detail&asset_id=2018616994This series in particular...https://stock.adobe.com/search/images?filters%5Bcontent_type%3A3d%5D=1&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aaudio%5D=0&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aillustration%5D=1&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aphoto%5D=1&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Atemplate%5D=1&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Avideo%5D=1&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Azip_vector%5D=1&filters%5Bfree_collection%5D=0&filters%5Binclude_stock_enterprise%5D=0&filters%5Bis_editorial%5D=0&filters%5Bgentech%5D=exclude&order=relevance&serie_id=2018616994
Is there a way to report or flag an image? I recently downloaded a file that was supposed to be a vector but it was a raster image within the Illustrator file. Also, I’ve downloaded several files that were created using the trace feature in Illustrator. Technically it’s a vector but it’s a very poor quality vector and it’s not obvious when looking at the preview.
Eu acredito que imagem semelhante não é imagem igual, por isso eu acho que deveriam aceitar os envios
I recently uploaded a video using Adobe Stock audio to YouTube and received a copyright claim. This is nothing new, as I have always been able to follow the procedure to dispute the claim and it gets cleared shortly after providing the license code. However, this time, after the copyright owner reviewed my claim, they “decided that their copyright claim is still valid.” The name that they provided for the copyrighted content isn’t even the name of the file I used in the video. How do I further appeal this process without the risk of getting a copyright strike on my account?
Adobe scan: I am getting charged after cancelling the subscription to premium while being in free trial (1 day in total), I want a refund since now my PayPal has negative balance.
Bonjour,J’ai utilisé un crédit Adobe Stock pour télécharger une illustration vectorielle de drapeaux (2031087779). Après ouverture du fichier dans Illustrator, je constate que la qualité du fichier ne correspond pas à ce que l’on peut attendre d’un visuel vectoriel exploitable professionnellement.La vectorisation présente de nombreuses nuances et variations de couleurs parasites sur les drapeaux, ce qui rend le fichier difficilement utilisable sans une importante reprise manuelle.Le but du téléchargement était de me faire gagné du temps, or le fichier n’est pas exploitable.Serait-il possible de procéder à la restauration du crédit utilisé pour cette ressource ?Merci par avance pour votre aide.
Posting in the Adobe Create Cloud uservoice after a recommendation from online live chat help, as Adobe Stock neither has its own Uservoice or Feature Request submission option. There needs to be an easier way to report an issue with an individual image from Stock.Adobe.com. I've had a couple incidents where an item either was showing up in safe search despite being explicit, or the final downloaded image is different than what was shown on the preview - e.g., downloading a vector file for a set of multiple logo icons and receiving only one with a different layout. Going through help chat to report this is tedious and time-conusming. The live chat assistants usually assume I'm either swiping the unpurchased watermarked preview and complaining about its resolution, or I'm trying to get credit back for a purchase. This is not their fault, but it takes going in circles a few times to figure out I'm just trying to report an issue with an image so other users don't come across it
Despite the fact that I always select “Exclude Generative AI” when searching for stock assets, more and more unlabeled gen AI vectors are showing up in the results. Some are more obvious than others but, while I’ve unfortunately fallen for some that I should’ve caught beforehand, Adobe needs to do more. This issue is becoming more and more prevalent and it’s extremely frustrating.Some of the ones I’ve come across:https://stock.adobe.com/2074252330 - Licensed https://stock.adobe.com/1943657900 - Licensed https://stock.adobe.com/1734713689 https://stock.adobe.com/1734713689 https://stock.adobe.com/1998498014 https://stock.adobe.com/2042110231 https://stock.adobe.com/2042109367 https://stock.adobe.com/1666239154 https://stock.adobe.com/1666239171 https://stock.adobe.com/1666239186 https://stock.adobe.com/1666238018 https://stock.adobe.com/1666238035 https://stock.adobe.com/1902286946 https://stock.adobe.com/1902286908 https://stock.adobe.com/2028220768 https://stock.adobe.com/2028220653 h
I accidentally added on this feature and got charged 23.99 gbp for this WHEN I HAVEN'T USED A SINGLE THING. Is there anyway I can be refunded?
I have a student account and the assets in Adobe Express from Adobe Stock are labeled under educational license. The information about licences on the website does not help me, I am not sure if it counts as a standard or maybe restricted license. I want to use these assets in a social media post for a non-profit and now I am not sure if I can.Thanks for any help
Originally taken photo (File ID: 2099850333) is mis interpretated as an AI image ,It was shot with DJI Mavic4 drone .
When navigating through the Adobe Stock audio library and listening to different music, it’s near-mandatory to use the mouse. So this means multiple clicks, moving the mouse to the middle part of the song to get the main “vibe” of the music and when not satisfied, scroll and click on next music. For 2 or 3 files, this would be acceptable. But when searching for music, it’s dozens, if not hundreds of tracks to go through manually and it’s a literal pain to go through.Please integrate hotkeys to make it easier : space > play/pause, up/down arrow : previous or next track in list, left/right arrows : -10 sec / +10 sec.
I had over 100 credits for Stock. They are all gone now. Where are they?
Remix with Firefly Community Gallery
Thousands of free creations to fall in love with and remix in Firefly.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.