Stock

I think I covered it. All I’m asking for is the option to click on an image in the Adobe Stock subscription service to avoid AI Studio — which I, personally, do not want. If someone wants to opt in to that, OK, but please GIVE US AN OPTION!

Often times, I will accidentally save numerous images to the wrong library and I’d like to be able to select multiple at once and move them into another library. This is a pretty standard feature on other stock websites and will also allow us to keep our projects organized. 

The subject header says it all really. Working on an environmental documentary series that cannot use any generative AI images. Due to the amount of un labelled gen AI video, I'd decided against using any Adobe stock. However, I needed a few additional videos and went against my better instincts to download some previews. Then today I was dropping some of these into a timeline and out of the ten I'd downloaded, something seemed off and upon closer inspection at least 3 were gen AI . The responsibility shouldnt fall upon the user to police this, it should fall upon Adobe. Any supplier who cannot provide some form of proof of authenticity for non AI conetent shouldnt be allowed to label it as such. End of story. These very nearly went into the final cuts and as gen AI gets harder to spot it's going to become more of a problem. 

What has happened to all the adobe stock illustrator assests. They are garbage and you can't use them. 80% of the time when I download a .ai asset it is trash and obviously a trace. I don't want to have to ask for a refund every single time when it is 80% of the time. Look at these three files I just downloaded. #2061475841. #2123046716 #2034659405

It can be hard to differentiate my downloaded assets without opening them if they’re any file outside of a JPG or PNG so it’d be great if some or all of the title text was included in the downloaded asset file name.

There are several intances of clearly generative Ai images on Adobe Stock that are not labeled as Ai. Is there a way to report these images? For example: FILE #: 623577639 from user Artofinnovation is clearly and Ai image but not labeled. In fact, all of this particular user's images are clearly ai images but many are missing the Ai label. Just looking through the 1st page of their portfolio I found no less than 10 Ai images that are missing the label:FILE #: 607885007FILE #: 623578485FILE #: 619605798FILE #: 623577640FILE #: 612087689FILE #: 610057244FILE #: 619604437FILE #: 583095681FILE #: 572620297FILE #: 605499016 Users need a way to report this while browsing and so far I have found no means to do this besides posting to the community. I am coming across this far too often. I want to avoid Ai images at all costs and filtering the search results to exclude generative Ai should not mean I still run into this many Ai images.    

Right now, the ‘report issue’ mechanism is insufficient. At present you can only report on 2 issues - names of people included in the artwork and IP infringement.In brief, we should be able to report on issues such as:• poor quality• inappropriate/explicit/insensitive content• unflagged AI content or image traced AI vectorsSince adobe have shown no particular inclination to moderate the content that ‘contributors’ are producing, at the very least they should allow users to report/flag content that does not meet quality expectation as well as unflagged AI images, AI images that have been image traced and passed off as human creation, images that claim to be vector but are an embedded raster image (downloaded one of those the other day) or images that may be culturally, morally or ideologically problematic.In a few other posts, there’s also been suggestion of user ratings for content, which I fully support.

Adobe Stock is currently very difficult to use professionally because of the flooding of low-grade AI generated vector assets.I would like to suggest a feature that would inform the user better of the actual quality of the file before deciding to download it.For example:Misleading thumbnail of a trashy, unusable, likely AI Generated stock asset. Note the useless filter on the left.Upon seeing this asset I imaging I can easily select objects to hide or recolor them, include products or texts behind some of the vegetal elements.Unfortunately upon download and inspection, the file is trash and unusable. Removing elements creates a hole in the illustration. Selecting an element to recolor or hide it is useless, as it also selects neighboring elements that merge with it.The Layers panels is an unfathomable sea of unlabeled elements that i do not wish to navigate. I think that I was misled by this thumbnail and wish Adobe would offer more information about the file to prevent feeling misled

I've seen several other posts in other threads saying this but I just wanted to add my voice to the chorus and say that as a user of stock photography I'm sick of AI-generated images showing up in my searches even when I've selected to exclude them in the filters. There are certain users who keep showing up in my searches as doing this (when you go on their libraries it's wall-to-wall AI stuff, so I have to imagine it's an intentional thing).  From what I've read this isn't against the rules currently but I just wanted to say I think it should be, and I'd like to be able to report or flag these posts. I know I can't do much as an artist against the tide of AI art but the least we can do is keep it separated from the more thoughtfully created stuff. Thanks!

When I search for images and use the “exclude AI-generated images” filter, there are still many clearly AI-generated images showing up, which is frustrating. If contributor tagging cannot be controlled because it may be done maliciously, then please allow users to exclude those results for their own protection. I would like to be able to exclude specific contributors from the search results. It would also be useful to set multiple contributors, and I would appreciate it if those settings could be saved and kept once registered. Thank you.

I’d like to request an update to how Area Type behaves specifically in Illustrator. The current default sizing for text boxes often slows down workflow, especially when adjusting layouts or cleaning up designs. It would be a huge time‑saver if Illustrator’s Area Type could auto‑size to fit the text by default.Alternatively, having a simple shortcut like in Indesign (command+option+C)—something like an instant “shrink to fit text” command—would make a big difference. Constantly dragging handles to resize type boxes is tedious, and a quick action would really streamline everyday work.

Adobe Stock really needs to implement a Ratings System so WE can provide feedback on Bad Stock Images, so others can avoid downloading the same file.  The Ratings Systems a simple 5 star system with comments section would serve to help the monthly subscribers, but also be a warning to content providers that you can't just upload pure crap.  I run across so many vectors that once you download and open the file you can tell it was nothing more than an image conversion from something already on the web.  We download vectors from Stock assuming it will be an original.  AI has only made things worse, many files are not at print resolution and should be labeled as such or at least with ratings I could read the reviews.  There is no way Adobe can monitor the quality of the ever growing library, we should have a way to help police the quality.  Ratings are such a common things, not sure why you have not implemented it already.

as mentioned in the subject line. An extra filter for vectors with editable stroke saves a lot of time and unnecessary purchases. A clearer filter function would be desirable anyway, as images/vectors are now always... are displayed that have nothing to do with the search term. So maybe a field: exclude images... or something similar. An AI search plugin that recognizes the content shown and then assigns it correctly would certainly be helpful here, so that you don't always have to rely solely on the keywords used by the creators, making a quick search obsolete. PS: when I entered the title, no corresponding post came up..if there is one here: sorry.

When navigating through the Adobe Stock audio library and listening to different music, it’s near-mandatory to use the mouse. So this means multiple clicks, moving the mouse to the middle part of the song to get the main “vibe” of the music and when not satisfied, scroll and click on next music. For 2 or 3 files, this would be acceptable. But when searching for music, it’s dozens, if not hundreds of tracks to go through manually and it’s a literal pain to go through.Please integrate hotkeys to make it easier : space > play/pause, up/down arrow : previous or next track in list, left/right arrows : -10 sec / +10 sec.

As global platform administrators, we are responsible for creating Developer Console credentials and distributing them to each sandbox administrator. These credentials are intentionally configured with the minimum permissions required to perform the requested action.Today, when a sandbox administrator requests access to a capability such as Data Ingestion, we can find the API documentation that explains the available endpoints and how to use them. However, we cannot find clear information in either the API documentation or Experience League about which specific permissions are required for each operation.For example, the documentation may describe a method such as POST – Create a new batch, including the request format and usage, but it does not indicate which AEP permissions must be assigned to the Developer Console credential in order to execute that operation successfully.Requested improvement:Please add, within each API method or endpoint documentation page, a small highlighted sec

Guided Activities in Adobe Express is such a time saver for teachers. Is there a plan to add those types of lessons in Aqua?

A search feature to search through already downloaded stock assets. 

Bonjour.Etant un client d'Adobe Stock, il m'arrive souvent de tomber sur des images proposées dans les résultats de recherche dont la qualité n'est pas du tout au rendez-vous. Aujourd'hui, mis à part le forum, il n'est pas possible pour un client de les signaler.Exemple sur cette photo :                                            N° de fichier :  304635841                                       Il faudrait avoir une solution plus simple pour les clients de pouvoir signaler une mauvaise qualité des fichiers proposés, depuis le panneau ''Report Issue'' par exemple qui ne permet que de signaler un abus de droits d'auteur ou de copyright à l'heure actuelle.S'il y a une autre méthode ce signaler ce genre d'image de mauvaise qualité évidente, faite-le moi savoir.Cordialem

“Fill Light” is one of the best modules within ACR. Unfortunately, it’s only available in process ver 2 and without the full masking control as seen in process ver 6. Requesting that the full masking control be available for process ver 2. 

Currently, Adobe Stock’s automated "Similar Content" filter frequently misinterprets variations in clinical pedagogy as duplicate spam. For instance, when submitting individual illustrations of different maxillary major connectors (e.g., Palatal Strap vs. Horseshoe Major Connector), the AI flags the files as identical because they share the same underlying background anatomy (the dental arch).Feature Suggestion: Please implement a specialized metadata or review sub-category for Educational, Technical, Medical & Dental Diagrams. The review algorithm for this specific category should prioritize text and metadata evaluation (such as changes in Kennedy Classifications or framework design terminology) over pure pixel-matching. This will prevent high-value instructional assets from being erroneously blocked by automated spam filters.Thank you for supporting specialized educational contributors.

Hi,   Envato has a filter to search for transparent videos. They download as transparent MOV files. No exrta work to mask out backgrounds. It's SO convenient.   Please add transparent videos to the Adobe Stock library.  They're so much easier to worth with for designers without as much video experience. Placing transparent videos over an image immediately adds dimension without doing a ton of extra work.   Adobe stock options like these or these say they're transparent, but when you download them they have a solid background. It's annoying. 

Estou em processo de melhorar do Workflow do meu Time com IA. E uma etapa bem demorada e trabalhosa é justamente a pesquisa de imagens e sons no Adobe Stock. E se subíssemos o roteiro e já surgisse uma lista de sugestões de imagens e músicas para comprar e baixar todas de uma só vez, ia ser muito mais rápido e prático.

Yesterday I’ve opened a request for refund as I got charged without knowing I didn’t cancel the whole plan from on first day of trial. Right away after charged yesterday I opened the ticket. But I got email that please go to help.adobe and all. I tried with the support chat, but ai assistant is keep saying I don’t have any open refund request with this email. I”m trying again n again I don’t know where to request refund or open refund request ?Can you share email or put me direct with the platform where I can get the refund  as it’s only 14 days window to request that, and it’s already 2nd day started

I would like to suggest changing the current generative AI disclosure workflow.Instead of only asking contributors to check “Created using generative AI tools,” Adobe Stock should require contributors to actively choose one of the following options for every submission:This content was created using generative AI tools. This content was partially created or edited using generative AI tools. This content was not created using generative AI tools.When contributors select “This content was not created using generative AI tools,” Adobe should display a clear warning that false or misleading declarations may result in asset removal, royalty withholding, account suspension, and further action if the mislabeling causes legal, licensing, or customer trust issues.This would reduce accidental mislabeling, discourage intentional abuse, and protect both Adobe Stock customers and honest contributors.

Hello everyone! I have a featured request to adobe team. I have some complaints about the Adobe Stock Contributor system. If someone files something wrong or breaks the rules in Adobe Stock Contributor, Adobe blocks the account directly without any warning and also does not have any system to withdraw any dollars in the account.I think Adobe Direct should give the contributor some time and opportunity by giving a warning instead of blocking the account. Because it takes a lot of time and effort for a contributor to create an account and build a huge portfolio. Adobe should keep this in mind. And even if the account is blocked, Adobe should have a system in place to withdraw the remaining money in the account.Thank you for attention to this matter.