Stock

When you use the lasso selection tool, click with your mouse on a place on the photo, many times it starts to select random figures. When this is not happening sometimes you can trigger it by making a selection and then delete this selection by Crtr-D. And then click left with the mouse on 1 place. I have test it on several versions. But version 27.0 is oke. The newer versions and the last one have this bug. 

Acabo de cancelar un plan de prueba para Adobe Stocks. Como puedo asegurarme que recibiré el reembolso de dinero? Debo aclarar que he cancelado el plan antes de los 14 días establecidos, después de que me han cobrado por el servicio. Esperaría recibir ese reembolso lo más rápido posible, adjunto la imagen en la que aseguran que recibiré el reembolso 

Searching Adobe Stock is extremely frustrating! I shouldn’t have to spend HOURS looking for photos and images. I’m finding it really difficult to narrow down results in Adobe Stock when I’m looking for very specific compositions (like side angle, over-the-shoulder, or device-focused shots).Are there specific keywords or search strategies that actually help refine results? The filters are of little to no use. For example, if I exclude all people, 40% of the results still show people in them. Also, does Adobe Stock support any kind of Boolean operators or advanced search syntax (like using +, AND/OR, etc.) to make searches more precise?Any additional insight is greatly appreciated! TIA!

I routinely find images that are clearly generated by AI image generators, but there is no indication in the description that they are. Generally it's missing fingers, or lighting or something else that gives it away, but my concern is that Adobe's team is not filtering all of these images well enough. I definitely see value in AI images, but I don't want to be downloading something that I think is a real image, when it is not. This is misleading at the least.    Example https://stock.adobe.com/images/santa-cooking/550542006?prev_url=detail

Started a free trial, but quickly found that most images are AI generated, not real photos, so I canceled.  If I  wanted AI images instead of real photos I can create them myself with my own tools without paying Adobe Stock $30 per month. Very disappointing.  I expected more from Adobe.

Photo edit karne Liye  

Please explain why I keep getting “Quality Issues” if I’m using your tools,  Firefly, Photoshop and Lightroom. It’s no fun if your programs don’t produce the QUALITY necessary  for Stock and commercial use. You need to EXPLAIN what and why my image is not accepted so in the future I can produce acceptable submissions. Otherwise what am I paying for? And going to the community for explanations is not really helpful. As they don’t have a clear answer. and you can’t upload the full sized file. You need much better feedback than just saying Quality Issues etc. 

Recently downloaded an asset from Adobe Stock (https://stock.adobe.com/uk/images/building-web-icons-in-line-style-hotel-hospital-apartament-city-town-house-mall-coffee-collection-vector-illustration/780136570?prev_url=detail) - this asset has clearly been created from a very poor quality image trace in Adobe Illustrator. These are also not editable strokes. I would imagine that all of the similar assets from this creator are the same.  Adobe needs a way of reporting slop like this. I would also like a credit refund for this rubbish. 

Since, after searching many previous posts here, there is apparently no way to report individual assets for their quality, issues, or misleading descriptions, other than entering into a long, complicated chat window or reporting it here publicly, I will report it here. The user "Kartick" has numerous vector line icon assets that claim in both the thumbnail image and the description to have an "editable stroke." The two that I have licensed do not have an editable stroke and I would assume that is true for the rest of their assets. The assets that I downloaded and confirmed do not have an editable stroke are: #1321977567 and #1318359047. Thankfully I have an education license through my employer, so wasting an asset download isn't a big deal for me, but if I had paid for this individually, I would be very upset. Just trying to prevent someone else from having this happen to them. Thank you.

https://stock.adobe.com/images/set-of-palm-trees-coconut-tree-palm-trees-silhouette/1324286057?prev_url=detailThis assset advertises a vector file but it's just a bitmap embedded in a AI file. Where can I report this directly to support to obtain the correct format?

1923665310 is not a vector as advertised. 

Stock image 707671228 is not a vector, it’s a jpeg plopped into a vector and totally unusable for my needs. Please refund credit

Hello,I mistakenly download a image  (image ID: #1870201887), can I please get the credit refunded? thank you very much.

Can you please inprove your Exclude People filter? I am looking for images of beaches without people in the shot. I checked the "Exclude People" box and still SO many of the images are of people, some not even at the beach. Why have a filter that doesn't do what it is supposed to? 

Hola, quisiera pedir orientación sobre una compra accidental en Adobe Stock.Hoy a las 2:54 AM compré por error la imagen AdobeStock_123254108, ya que pensé que estaba incluida dentro del plan mensual de Adobe Stock que ya pago actualmente.La descargué bajo esa suposición, pero me di cuenta de que había sido un cargo adicional hasta que recibí el correo de confirmación de compra.Intenté contactar a soporte el mismo día en cuanto lo noté, pero no había agentes disponibles.¿Alguien ha pasado por una situación similar y ha logrado que se revise o reembolse la compra?Agradecería mucho cualquier orientación sobre la mejor forma de proceder.¡Gracias!

I downloaded two different wallpapers https://stock.adobe.com/search/images?k=cash%2525252Bwallpaper&asset_id=126015203 and when I try to import them into Photoshop, they claim the app doesn't support the printing of banknotes. Then why offer them in Stock without at least a warning? This is super frustrating.

Posting in the Adobe Create Cloud uservoice after a recommendation from online live chat help, as Adobe Stock neither has its own Uservoice or Feature Request submission option. There needs to be an easier way to report an issue with an individual image from Stock.Adobe.com. I've had a couple incidents where an item either was showing up in safe search despite being explicit, or the final downloaded image is different than what was shown on the preview - e.g., downloading a vector file for a set of multiple logo icons and receiving only one with a different layout. Going through help chat to report this is tedious and time-conusming. The live chat assistants usually assume I'm either swiping the unpurchased watermarked preview and complaining about its resolution, or I'm trying to get credit back for a purchase. This is not their fault, but it takes going in circles a few times to figure out I'm just trying to report an issue with an image so other users don't come across it

Good morning, we had about 260 credits on our Adobe Stock account, and they were suddenly removed.

I'm just looking for images I can use as general anatomy practice while drawing, and I found this abomination (file number 677462298). I always exclude AI generated images and look for photos, and I immediately knew it was AI because horses do not move like that. It's a biomechanical impossibility. There is no option to report trash like this on the preview page, I looked through the support pages, and the only directions I got from Google - which, btw, are better than what your site gave me, Adobe - were to the forums. Now, I'd've much rather have just submitted a report and called it good, but you left me with no other option than going public with my grievances. Do better, Adobe.

I have had several audio assets flagged for copyright claims on YouTube. Often times, these claims are being initiated by Adobe's partners (i.e. Epidemic Sound) I've disputed these with YouTube and put in the asset license in the dispute but the partners don't remove the claim and we have to wait 30 days for it to be removed. In the meantime, YouTube appears to be holding back putting these videos in searches because our views are down on all the videos that have claims.  The problem is that once you submit the dispute, there is no other recourse in YouTube I think Adobe needs to clear things up with their partners and with YouTube to prevent this from continually happening. Considering how many people use Adobe products to produce YouTube content, this should be a no brainer. If anyone has any other work around for this issue, I'd love to hear it.

Adobe promised me to give unlimited access for generating Ai image and video if i buy Adobe Firefly Pro Plus membership / subscription , but only in three days i am asked to pay again for i have paid already and my services has been stopped

Cancel my account immediately. I’m being charged nearly $100 for Photoshop plus my £70 subscription, including an unauthorized £19.99. Fix this now or I will dispute charges via my bank and report to consumer protection.