Camera Raw

Meu Camera Raw esta desabilitado, e diz que nao e compativel com o meu sitema mas isso nao pode ser pq o meu imac e 4k 

We create yearbook photos and images always have variation in tone and color in the background.  The background masking works wonders now on an individual image but is there a way to batch balance the background on multiple images so they are near the same tone and color?  I'm attaching a contact sheet with 4 images before and after. This is what I'm doing manually and while not perfect, obviously much closer.  Is there anyway to batch automate this process or get it somewhat close?  I would gladly by a coffee for anyone that can help find a solution for this, if there is 🙂 

In the **scam email address**x webpage called "cameras supported by camera raw," there is a chart with the column-heading, "Camera Matching Profile Available." What is this column about?

Hello everyone, I hope you are doing well. I am having a particular issue with Camera RAW and PREVIEW.   I just purchased a new Mac Studio and installed Sonoma 14.2.1 I have Lightroom and photoshop at the latest version I have Camera Raw 16.1 I also have several camera, old ones, like 1- Lumix LX-100 (RW2 RAW files) 2- Nikon D800 (NEF RAW Files) 3- Nikon D300 (NEF RAW Files) And I see all the images in my Finder no problem, I can open them easily with the space bar and they show perfectly well on PREVIEW.   BUT I just purchased a Lumix S5iiX also using RW2 files for their RAW and I cannot see them at all in Finder/Preview. I can see the image in Photoshop or Lightroom but NOT in Finder/Preview and I use this all the time to quickly look at an image.NOTE: FIRMWARE  of my Lumix is at the latest (1.4)   Anyone has a solution ? I tried rebooting, I tried re-installing Camera Raw, nothing fix this issue. I even opened a ticket at Panasonic, so far they have no solution.

I have read a few post trying to find a solution but nothing seems to work for me. Here is the difference between camera raw and the psd file. I have no idea why but when i make a print screen, camera raw gets very bright. But even then, the difference between the color is quite big. The red is better looking in camera raw than in the psd. I hope someone knows how to fix this.

Does Lightroom plan to support heic/avif with SMPTE ST 2084 PQ and P3/Rec.2020 color gamut HDR files in both import and export?

Bonjour je ne ne trouve pas la pipette balance des blancs sur camera raw 16.1.  comment l'installer ?

I appreciate Sharpness is used in masks in ACR and the amount can be varied - but what is it actually doing?  Is it similar to Texture and Clarity?If Sharpening is used in ACR it can be selective and the various parameters can be suited to taste.I am trying to determine which will prove better for finner detail.

Por las notas de Adobe 10723 y otra relativa a máscas del primer semestre, y la propia experiencia, a pesar de tener activado en preferencias "Varios" si aplico máscaras desaparecen opciones como los mencionados en el asunto.  Y aparece alguna otra distinta. Es como si tuviésemos dos menús, uno para trabajar sin máscaras y otro para trabajar con ellas.Es farragoso. Yo lo solucciono desactivando máscaras y volviendo a ellas alternativamente. Todo ello salvo algún error de interpretación por mi parte. Supongo que hay razones de índole técnica que lo justifican. Pero, entiendo, no es lo deseable.   Muchas gracias

There is a big bug in the update!Camera Raw 16.1 HDR without data and small size which is not possible, so I will not update for the time being as long as that bug is there... and it has been that way for a long time since the update... 😞

y a t il une personne qui pourrait m'expliquer comment obtenir la barre d'outil audessus de l'image comme visible sur de nombreux tutos.  sur photoshopje cherche entre autre la pipette permettant de fair un blanc 

I want to use Superresolution in Adobe Camera RAW 13.2.  Adobe help says to "right click on the Filmstrip" in RAW 13.2  to open the new Super-resolution menu. (I use Command-Shift-A to get to RAW)My problem is that I never ever see a filmstrip in RAW, only the single image I  work on in Photoshop. How do I get to a filmstrip so that I can click on it?? thanks www

I like to convert my raw files to dng for the simple reason ... the sidecar files, i dont like those.  Is it better to use adobe lightroom or capture one for that matter to convert raw files to dng, or is it better to use adobe dng converter?  alot of my dng files just show as dng icon in my mac finder window as u can see in the attachment.

The Panasonic S5 Mark 2 was allegedly supported shortly after release, however, i have lost id say about 15-20% of all imports to unspecific 'error's with the images up until most recent updates.This frustrating issue as with all things Panasonic has resulted in hot potato between Adobe and Panasonic, with neither party admitting fault nor responsibility. Frustratingly lost some fantastic shots from my travels.

what those "errors" when running Adobe DNG Converter in command line mode ( v16.0.0.1677 on Windows 10x64 ) might be ?*** Error: Exception in GetRuntimeModelZooPaths (). ****** GPU Warning: GPU3 disabled via cr_config at init time. ****** Error: ComputeRawDepthModelKey () model #1 not present ****** Error: ComputeRawDepthModelKey () model #2 not present ****** Error: ComputeBaseLayeredDepthModelKey () - mask-guided refinement model not present ****** Error: ComputeBaseFocalMatteModelKey () model not present ***DNG file still created, but why the messages ?they are silently written to logs in C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\Logs ( user = Administrator in this case )  creating 2 filesDNG Converter Log Latest v0.txtDNG Converter Log Latest v1.txtwhen I use dng converter just in a command line in Windows however when I run the command line from within Matlab it pollutes the system ( Matlab function : [status,cmdout] = system(command) )  output to

I have the same problem, but in Photoshop, when I use the camera raw filter the photo changes color, I have already disabled the performance but it didn't help

Hello,When I am increasing dehaze value on my pictures, the colors change drastically. Is this a bug or natural occurance? And how can I prevent/correct this?Examples:Dehaze value 50Dehaze value 25Dehaze value 0

Possible Bug.   ACR 16.1Mac OS Sonoma 14.2.1Happens in both LRc and PS - no surprise there.Profile Corrections turned OFF Following images taken with a Nikon Z9.  Look on left and right side for differences.NX Studio first shows correct file size per Nikon 8256x5504.Next image is Fast Raw Viewer which shows file size as larger 8280x5520Here's the rub though - look at the left side first and see how pixels to the left of small silver Bialetti are missing.  It's not the proflie/lens correction that is off and I tried the different crop modes.  Also looks at the right sixe and you see a brown wood handle in the NX Studio and FRV image that is missing from ACR.  ACR with no profile correction. LRc with no lens correction

Hi, has anyone noticed a problem with perspective correction in Camera Raw? It doesn't work properly after the last update for me - v. 16.1. Perspetcive transormation stretches the image like "Aspect" slider instead of aligning vertically and horizontally, both with automatic and manual correction. In addition, automatic correction in some photos distorts the image in a strange way. Is there a way to downgrade ACR?

Photoshop 2024; Mac OS 14.2 Hi there, probably user error but this is what happened: I spent what seemed like ages healing lots of sensor dust spots from a NEF file in ACR via the normal Healing Tool, then later I decided to use Reduce Noise with AI, that done I noticed spots in the sky when I was applying a tone curve, I investigated by Visualising Spots and was horrified to discover another rash of new spots that required me to heal them all again. What did I do wrong? Many thanks Simon

Help!! I am eding in camera raw on my mac and everything is updated. When I go to edit the photo will change temp as i touch sliders like exposure but in the preview at the bottom it shows how im editing so I go off that. once I save it looks WAY darker and off . What in the world is happening and how do i fix it 

I'm invoking DNG converter 16.1 from the command line in Mac OS Sonoma 14.2. When using JPEG XL compression (e.g. with flag -jxl_distance 0.2) I only get a 256x192 pixel preview in the resulting DNG compared with a full-size one without the jxl flag. This seems to me to be a bug, or is there a workaround? Command is of the form "$dng_converter" -d "$output_folder" -p2 -lossy -jxl_effort 4 -jxl_distance 0.2 /Volumes/Untitled/DCIM/source_file

Eu consigo clicar nele, porém ele não entra, e está 100% atualizado junto com o Photoshop, por favor, preciso que seja solucionado, por gentileza, pois acesso ele em meus trabalhos no photoshop, e ele estando impossibilitado de acessar me limita.

I have a new Z8 which I am just beginning to learn my way around. I have an existing D850 for several years. And I have used ACR & Photoshop as an amateur for many years. This Z8 is quite a different beast. One thing (of many) that struck me right away was how different the images from the Z8 look in ACR. And particularly some of the starting values in ACR are not what I had expected and quite different from the starting values for a D850 NEF file. See below image - there are two sets of comparisons from ACR. The first pair (D850 on the left Z8 on the right) show differnces for initial settings for sharpening and noise reduction. The second pair (whoops, the Z8 is on the left thistime and D850 on the right) show differences for claity & texture). I am used to editing files from the D850 starting with Sharpening at 40, Radius 1.0, Detail of 25, and Luminance zero. But notice that ACR begins with very different values for files from the Z8. Radius of 2.0, Sharpening 24, Luminanc

Since last update I'm getting the following error after editing a photo in camera raw and trying to open in photoshop.  The only work around that I have found was to save the edit as a .jpg from camera raw and then open it in Photoshop.  Not a great solution. Help!