After effects has a Extrude modeling tool already that helps to extrude texts and shapes.I have used it to model simple things. If After effects can also have Lathe feature so we can do simple spline modeling by lathing the pen shapes it will be an aded 3D feature.
Adding pages to the boards, similar to how Figma uses pages in their design files, could help section out the creative further.Example use cases:All the content generated for a Round 1 of Creative Development could live in a page. Then Round 2 would have its own page. Batch photography creation could be segmented across pages. Lifestyle with product on one page, lifestyle without product on another, product imagery on another, etc.Essentially, giving the board even more longevity and collaboration instead of only relying on the sections tool or manually organizing.
I am assuming this is a feature issue and not just a bug since others have reported the same thing. The exported video quality is rubbish and there are not settings available to fix this in exporting the video. It takes a well lit video and flattens it and darkens it to the point where it is too compressed to get that quality back.
It would be nice to have some better tool to change Grid settings easily (any extra panel, section in Options panel etc.), not just in Preferencies.
Why can’t I write long prompts? Why is there a limit on prompt length? I have a paid subscription, but the number of words is limited in Adobe Firefly. Why is that? I’m even thinking about switching to another AI just because of this. What’s the problem? How can I remove this limitation? I need to write a more detailed prompt, but I can’t because of the restrictions!
Runway Gen 4.5 should have 9:16 not just 16:9. Please work to make that possible, I have to get a runway account to generate 9:16.
As a cinematic video editor, I frequently use slow motion and stabilization together. Currently, Premiere Pro gives an error and forces us to Nest every single clip. Nesting hundreds of clips ruins the editing workflow, makes timeline management messy, and wastes a huge amount of time. Please update Premiere Pro so that the internal 'Order of Effects' handles Speed and Warp Stabilizer together automatically, without needing a Nested Sequence.
After Effects In-App Spell Check and Misspelling Correction for Text Layers: Feature SummaryPlease add a built-in spell-checking and misspelling correction system to Adobe After Effects for text layers.After Effects is frequently used to create title sequences, advertisements, social media content, lower thirds, presentations, and motion graphics containing large amounts of text. However, there is currently no convenient way to identify spelling mistakes directly inside the application.Proposed FunctionalityThe feature could automatically detect misspelled words inside text layers and provide:A colored underline beneath possible misspellings Right-click spelling suggestions One-click word replacement “Ignore,” “Ignore All,” and “Add to Dictionary” options Support for multiple languages The ability to enable or disable spell checking A project-wide spelling review panel The option to scan all compositions and text layers for errorsWhy This Feature Is NeededSpelling mistakes in motion graphics are easy to overlook, especially when working with:Large projects containing many compositions Multiple text layers Fast client revisions Captions and subtitles Foreign-language content Templates containing editable text Small or animated typography that is difficult to reviewCurrently, users often need to copy text into another application, such as Microsoft Word, Google Docs, or an online spell checker, and then paste it back into After Effects. This interrupts the workflow and increases the possibility of formatting errors or missed corrections.Suggested WorkflowWhen a user enters text into a text layer, After Effects could underline suspected misspellings. The user could right-click the word to view suggested corrections or open a dedicated Spell Check panel to review every text layer within the project.A project-wide option would be especially valuable because text may be hidden inside pre-compositions, Essential Graphics templates, or duplicated compositions.BenefitsThis feature would:Reduce embarrassing spelling mistakes in final exports Improve quality control Save time during client revisions Keep the entire text-review process inside After Effects Improve workflows for motion designers, editors, agencies, social media teams, and template creatorsSpell correction is a standard feature in many writing and design applications. Adding it to After Effects would provide a meaningful quality-of-life improvement for anyone creating text-based motion graphics.This feature exist already in Photoshop and illustrator; why not add it to after effects as well.
"In Bridge 2026 with multi-monitor setup, the Full Screen Preview (Spacebar) always opens on the main monitor — not on the monitor where the Preview Panel is located. Please add an option to choose which monitor the Full Screen Preview opens on."
Hello, I often use masking to brighten up a place in the photo, especially for portrait pictures. I always start by selecting the outline of the place I want, except that unfortunately Lightroom Classic doesn’t offer (or maybe a secret function?) to be able to fill the inside of the selection. Because it would save valuable minutes on retouching since I’m not a fan of the automatic skin detection tool. (I often have strange effects on the contours of faces, arms, hands when the background is not the same color. Which is understandable when the colors are a bit similar). I can take about 15 minutes or more for some masks to fill the inside. And even by removing the gradual outline of the brush, to fill the inside and go faster, I often end up with small unpainted spots (setting the exposure to +2.00 to check the entire mask). This option would allow me and could allow us Lightroom users a huge saving of editing time in photography. And as a professional photographer, this time saving is considerable when there are many photos to edit. Thanks in advance,
Hello Adobe Bridge Team,I would like to report a long-standing issue with the Preview Panel in Adobe Bridge 2026 on a Mac with Apple Studio Display (5120x2880 / Retina).PROBLEM:The Preview Panel does not scale up images to fill the available panel space. Instead, images are displayed at their native pixel size, resulting in large grey/black borders around the image — even when the image resolution (e.g. 2100px wide) is smaller than the physical display resolution (5120px).This makes the Preview Panel practically useless on high-resolution Retina displays, as images appear very small regardless of panel size.Affected features:• Preview Panel (floating or docked)• Full Screen Preview via Spacebar (opens on wrong monitor in multi-display setups)• "Generate Monitor-Size Previews" option in Preferences → Advanced does not reliably fix the issue and resets after every Bridge restartSETUP:• Mac with Apple Studio Display (5120x2880)• Adobe Bridge 2026• Multi-monitor setup (Studio Display + 2x Dell U2415)REQUEST:1. Add an option to scale up images in the Preview Panel to fill the available space (similar to "Fit to Panel")2. Fix the "Generate Monitor-Size Previews" preference so it persists after restart3. Allow Full Screen Preview (Spacebar) to open on the monitor where the Preview Panel is locatedThis issue has been reported by many users since Bridge 2020 and remains unfixed in Bridge 2026. It significantly impacts professional photo review workflows on modern Retina displays.Thank you for considering this request.
Currently, in Photoshop, the only way to clean up the "Recents" home screen is to clear the entire recent files history (File > Open Recent > Clear Recent File List). There is no way to target and remove just one specific file from the list.The Feature Idea: I would like to request the ability to remove individual files from the "Recent" list (whether they are stored locally or in the Creative Cloud) without actually deleting the physical file from the disk or cloud storage.How it could work: Simply add a small "X" icon (or a "Remove from Recents" option in a right-click context menu) on the corner of each file thumbnail/list item on the Home screen. Clicking it would immediately hide that specific file from the active Recents list.Why this is important: * Privacy: If we are working on a confidential project or presenting our screen to a client, we might want to hide a specific project from the home screen without losing our entire search history or other active projects. Workspace Organization: It allows users to quickly clean up their workspace by removing finished or irrelevant drafts, keeping only the active files they actually need to focus on.
Could we please get manual sorting back for colors in Creative Cloud Libraries? Automatic sorting is fine, but I usually need to arrange my palettes in a specific visual order, and drag‑and‑drop was the most useful way to do that. Thanks for considering it!
I do NOT follow the prescribed order from Adobe: Edit -> Light, Color.... My normal flow is to eliminate distractions first. So I 1. Crop/Rotate. 2. Enable Camera Optics 3. Geometry 4. Then start the Adobe flow of "Edit (global) > Light, Color..... It would be nice if we can change the order of the icons/panels to match how we think.
Thanks to the new text panel design (!) that is disgusting (sorry, no offence intended). I find it to be resource-intensive, particularly on my Windows 11 24H1 system with an i7 CPU. Whenever I select a text layer and hover over the fonts list, it consumes huge resources of my system. I would like to request a toggle option to disable the live preview of the fonts (this option is nonsense for me).
In Premiere Pro, Fit to Fill (Change Clip Speed) currently works when: loading a single source clip in the Source monitor and set In/Out, or loading a source sequence as a nest and perform a 4‑point edit. However, if “Insert and overwrite sequences as individual clips” while working from a source sequence (typical “reel” workflow), Fit to Fill is not available. To use Fit to Fill, I have to match‑frame back to the underlying clip in the source sequence, set In/Out again there, then perform the 4‑point edit from that original clip. That breaks the flow and ignores the In/Out I already marked in the source sequence.My common workflow: I build source reels as sequences (dailies, selects, etc.). I load those sequences in the Source monitor with “insert/overwrite sequences as individual clips” so I can cut pieces of those reels directly into the main timeline. Sometimes I want to do a Fit to Fill: I mark In/Out on the source reel and In/Out on the program timeline and expect Premiere to adjust clip speed to fill that duration. Right now, Premiere only behaves and gives the fit to fill option if the source sequence is treated as a nest. When it’s “individual clips,” Fit to Fill doesn’t honor the source sequence’s In/Out and can’t complete the edit. It’s greyed out. The workaround is: Match‑frame to the underlying clip in the source sequence. Re‑mark my source In/Out on that clip. Then perform the Fit to Fill 4‑point edit from that clip. This works technically, but it’s clunky and loses the editorial context of the reel.Requested behaviorPlease enable Fit to Fill / 4‑point editing when cutting from a source sequence as individual clips. An option I am sure the Adobe engineers could implement way better: If I have In/Out set on the source sequence in the Source monitor and In/Out set on the program sequence, Fit to Fill should: Match‑frame to the clip at the source In point inside the source sequence. Respect the source sequence’s In/Out selection (or, at minimum, the duration). Adjust that clip’s speed to fill the program In/Out, the same way it does with a normal clip Fit to Fill. In most real‑world cases, my Fit to Fill range lives inside a single clip in the source sequence, so this is straightforward. If the marked source range spans two source‑sequence clips, Premiere could either: fit only the first clip, or show a Fit Clip dialog with an option like “Span multiple source clips (change speed across them)” to handle the more complex case. Conceptually, the editor’s expectation is:“I marked the section I want in my source reel and marked where it should go in the timeline; Fit to Fill should adjust speed to make that happen, regardless of whether the source is a single clip or a sequence set to individual clips.” Why this improves workflow Editors who cut from reels, dailies sequences, or selects sequences can stay in that context instead of bouncing back and forth to original clips via match‑frame. It makes Fit to Fill consistent with other 4‑point behaviors: four points are set, so Premiere should honor them regardless of source type. It reduces extra operations (match‑frame, re‑mark In/Out, then edit), which adds up significantly on long‑form jobs. Even if there are edge cases with multi‑clip spans, having Fit to Fill work for the common “single‑clip inside a source reel” scenario would be a big quality‑of‑life improvement for editors who love working from sequences in the Source monitor. (although the math to fit to fill when spanning multiple clips really shouldn’t be that hard)
Metadata fields provide an opportunity to liberate us from the difficulties of using the file system (filenames and directories) for sorting and searching. The Lightroom sort options should take advantage of this. I would particularly like to sort on the Title and Caption fields, and to use multiple sort criteria, as in Sort by Title and then by Capture Time.
Add support for editing with media remaining in place on external USB-connected drives (such as via the Files app) on iOS and iPadOS. LumaFusion is a great example of a iPhone/iPad app that allows this (as do Resolve and Final Cut on iPad)
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.