I'm a bit baffled that the default time interpolation is set to "frame sampling" - which I think sounds much fancier than it is!It's actually whole/hold frames- meaning that by default when an editor puts a clip in the timeline in slow motion, (say 50%), each frame is held for 2 frames, and the result is choppy playback....dating myself here by referring to this as 'reservoir dogs' style - aka stuttery CHEAP!I work with some editors that often forget to check in on all speed ramps and timing work they have done, and then we end up with choppy videos. I would love to see a global preference in pref/media where a user could specify an alternate default for time modified clips. Also, I recently learned (pls PLS correct me if I'm wrong here!) that when 'conforming' a timeline that has clips with multiple frame rates within it, it's the time interpolation that essentially conforms the clips for render output. I was recently working on a documentary project with many mixed source resolutions and frame rates, and was shocked to see that 'choppy video' interpolation was the default way that Premiere handles this situation. Yowsa! I'm pretty sure that I'm not the only editor who would like to see this change happen.Many thanks to all in the Adobe Community and Dev Team!
Using the batch image processing. Results are great however I am processing 90+ headshots at a time. File names are the persons name, but the output files are changed to a long string of letters and numbers. I now have no idea who is who and manually renaming them by cross referencing the original files is a loss of all time saved. Plus the human error risk is high in this kind of work. Please Allow AI assistant batch processing to preserve the original source filename on output files.
Anyone else find the new curves adjustment line and points to be overly thick and huge? Not sure why as the previous width and size of the line and curve points were just fine and easier to make small adjustments.Here's a screen capture of them now in PS 27.1.0.
My account cannot make payments; it works for the first time but fails the second
生成履歴の画面で、チェックボックスを付けるとお気に入りの星マークが消えてしまうのですが、お気に入り以外を削除する作業がしづらいので、以前のように戻してほしい。以前はチェックを付けても、お気に入りの星マークが消える事はありませんでした。[Moved to Adobe Firefly Feature Requests by a moderator]
When subtitling long conversations, I have a style preference of removing full stops/periods at the ends of sentences, especially if the subtitle is just a single sentence. It makes the subtitles cleaner and the conversation seem less stilted. I'd love to see an option in the Create Captions dialogue box to automatically remove these trailing punctuation marks at the end of subtitles.
Please add new 3:4 aspect ratio for the IG “add border and share…” feature. IG has updated its max vertical aspect ratio in 2026. Or just allow me to pick custom aspect ratio under the “add border” feature.
The new forum design leads to a lot of confusion when some users click on “Create a Post” and then they don’t understand what is being requested. Here is what they see: Nowhere does it say “title” and so some users go ahead and enter ridiculously long titles, and sometimes there is no text because they put everything in the title. Here is an example This is not an isolated example, these ridiculously long titles happens often. Another example: The dialog box is very confusing and misleading. Perhaps a better dialog box would say the word “title” which I think is much more well understood than “Briefly describe your question”. In its place you could say something like “Please enter a title (a few words) for your question”. Please consider making this change. This would make the forum much more usable for people who use the forum regularly, and this would lessen the confusion for new users trying to create a post.
There is nothing to describe here, it’s in the title. I’m making a feature request that any sane person who has worked as a photographer would wonder why on earth Adobe would fail to offer as a default. that is the 2:3 ratio as a standard crop option within the firefly mood board functionality, given this is the ratio that the vast majority of DSLRs shoot at natively. It’s almost like Adobe failed to understand their customer's needs?
When working with frame based animations in Photoshop the frame numbers start at 1.This is fine for most things, like making an animated gif for export, but when intending to export the individual frames sometimes there is a need to have the frame numbers start at 0.For instance when animating frames to be imported into another app which is more programmer orented, where numbered systems start at 0 (video game engines, etc), or even After Effects, which starts at frame 0.If you ever need to come back in and make changes to the Photoshop file you have to “remember to subtract one.. or was that add one? no I was right the first time”.
Considero que las imágenes deben cobrarse o gastar créditos una vez descargadas para su uso final, porque aunque la imagen se genere no necesariamente se usa; esto debido a que los clientes solicitan cambios de imágenes con frecuencia durante el proceso de diseño. Debería implementarse un sistema de marcas de agua que permitan probar las fotos antes de descargarlas, (como se hace en las fotos de stock) de esta manera se pueden probarse varias.
It is unfair that I am charged for ai misunderstanding a prompt, this would be solved by only being charged for videos that are downloaded
Keyframes are something we constantly use in Premiere Pro, especially for common tasks like zooming in, zooming out, or zooming to specific corners. Over time, people have come up with creative ideas to make this process less tedious and more enjoyable. I'm not suggesting getting rid of the Effects Panel, as we still need the ability to fine-tune keyframes in detail, but I think there should be a quicker, more intuitive way to work with keyframes—something more engaging and fun than constantly clicking on stopwatches.One feature I’d love to see in Premiere is something similar to DaVinci Resolve’s Dynamic Zoom. Essentially, you’d have a set of presets with quick access in the Effects tab, and Premiere Pro could apply a default zoom effect to all clips, which would save a lot of time. Another tool I’m a big fan of is a plugin called DragAndZoom Pro for Premiere.It allows you to drag a box over the area of the screen you want to zoom into, and a transform effect is automatically applied based on your selection. It’s a great feature, but the downside is that you have to press REFRESH every time you want to use it because it relies on a custom screenshot of the program monitor instead of interacting directly with it. If Adobe could integrate this functionality into the Program Monitor, with an option for direct zoom manipulation, that would be a game changer. imagine having a sub-panel where you can drag and zoom directly within the Program Monitor in Premiere, with customizable options for zoom and shutter effects. This would greatly improve the keyframe experience, making it more dynamic and enjoyable to use. I believe there are better ways to streamline keyframing, and I'd love to see more fun, creative approaches to it. Thank you!-Gabriel
Make the hand tool available in every panel: Currently, the hand tool is only available in the canvas window. Allowing users to use the hand tool in every panel, such as the layers panel or the history panel, would make it easier to navigate the interface with mouse and all types of graphics pen tablets.
The masking tools in Camera Raw are easy, efficient, and powerful, especially with the Alt Intersect shortcut. It might be very useful, if we could export them to be re-used in Photoshop, even if we lose their dynamicness.
When merging layers in Photoshop, the resulting layer always takes the name of the topmost layer. Could you add an option for the merged layer to keep the name of the first selected layer instead? This would save time and avoid constant renaming.
In a reply message, the translate button appears at the bottom of the reply. This is rather pointless and wastes a lot of our time. See example below, which comes from this reply. We have to scroll down to the bottom of long replies, click on translate and then scroll back to the top of the message to start reading it. Translate should be at the top of the message.
Hello,I would like to submit a feature request regarding timecode-based synchronization in Adobe Premiere Pro.In my workflow, I regularly work with a large number of clips (e.g., 100+ clips from multiple cameras) that are already perfectly synchronized using timecode. My goal is to align all clips directly in the timeline based on their individual timecode while keeping them as fully independent timeline elements.At the moment, this is not possible in Premiere Pro. The Synchronize function only works for a small number of selected clips, and larger selections are restricted. This forces users into multicam workflows, which are not always appropriate, especially when full individual clip control is required.What makes this limitation even more surprising is that external tools such as PluralEyes have been able to perform this type of batch synchronization easily for years, including large-scale multi-clip synchronization based on timecode and/or waveform analysis. Given this, it is difficult to understand why a similar capability is not natively available inside Premiere Pro.A simple feature such as:“Batch align selected timeline clips by individual timecode while preserving clip independence”would solve this issue and significantly improve efficiency for many professional workflows (documentary, multicam productions, scripted shoots, and archival projects).This would allow editors to:keep full control of individual clips in the timeline avoid unnecessary multicam structures synchronize large numbers of clips in a single operation rely less on external tools for a fundamental workflow stepI believe this would be a highly valuable addition to an already powerful editing tool.Thank you for your consideration.
The core of this proposal is simple: when a channel is toggled OFF, its blending mode and opacity values in the layer stack should be greyed out, allowing artists to instantly filter out visual noise.To maintain a seamless workflow, simply interacting with a dimmed slider should automatically re-activate the channel, sparing the user unnecessary clicks. Naturally, whenever a channel is actively driven (whether by the main layer, generators, or filters), its text must return to a bright, solid white.This minor refinement offers a massive quality-of-life boost, minimizing visual fatigue and making the interface communicate far more intuitively.Thank you.Max
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.