Photoshop

I am not a pro with Adobe products, but all of the perspective correction tools I have seen in Photoshop or Lightroom seem to involve stretching the top part of an image until the sides are straight. What I am interested in is taking a photograph of a building and converting it to what would be the equivalent of an architectural elevation. This would involve straightening the image, but also stretching it vertically. I imagine this would involve calculating the difference between the bottom and top lengths of the skewed image and using that to calculate how foreshortened the image is, which in turn would allow for a calculated and graded stretching of the image. Imagine a brick wall 20 feet wide and 20 feet tall. All brick courses are the same height. But in a photo taken from the ground, the courses at the bottom would be the right height but those higher up would appear shorter, due to the perspective. At the same time the wall would taper inward in the photo as well. There must be a

I would love to have an option in the settings, where I can decide, if I want an image as a layer to be linked, not embeded by default (similar to how in InDesign works). It would reduce the file sizes a lot, and I do work with files, that are just too big (eg. 22gb .psb files), and makeing them linkable is kinda bad right now.

Hi, I want a links panel like in Indesign that shows both embedded and linked images/smartobjects.And also a function to select individual embedded/linked image and convert it back to unembedded (if it was linked) or linked (if it was embedded).

Thanks in advance for hearing me out.  One of my biggest issue in reinstalling my OS is getting the wacom tablet to work in Photoshop correctly. I need "windows ink" but not "pen and touch," I still get the little "alt" and the pop up text box but ok. Ah, right click works but not on the pallets. Why? This is such a broken system that when I think about migrating computers or reinstalling the OS I almost only think about how much it will suck for the week following bc of wacom+windows junk+photoshop.... I wish more than anyting that photoshop could have it's own solution. I mean there was that PSConfig.txt hack from many years ago so there must be a way to do it at the software level? Idellaly, and I think this is the case for most people, the mouse and tablet would more or less be the same but with pen pressure.... Honestly that's all the matters to most stylus artists - the rest is a workflow luxury but pen pressure, cant live without it.  Just a super simple intu

I've been using PS for nearly 20 years and have always been frustrated by the actions panel. I use button view and have quite a collection of actions to help process images, perhaps too many. It's VERY time consuming to scroll through them all trying to locate the one I want to use. I know them by name, but locating them is difficult as the are not loaded alphabetically. For years, I've been trying to figure out where the search bar is to simply type in the action name to locate and implement a specific action I want to use. I've never found this and it seems quite obvious, rudimentary and necessary for efficiency when processing photos. Why can't I find this?? Please tell me there IS a search bar option to alleviate the time suck that searching row by row for a name in a sea of hundreds can be?!!!  It's baffling that a beast of a program like PS would not have a simple tool like this. Also, is it possible to create multiple tabs in the action panel where I could sort the act

When creating multiple variation for Image to text it would be helpful to mark favorites in a way they immediately stand out from all generations. For instance with a heart or star icon that is widely used.   The mockup shows both states outlined and filled. Obviously there should only be one icon in the corner.  

When I am editing a lot of photos and I need to crop an image, I usually use the non crop tool.  When I'm done, depending on the size of the document, I have to use the slide bars to move the image back into center view.  Seems to me there should be a "return image to center after cropping".  Adobe help line suggests I use the crop tool which will keep the image centered but then that creates another issue.  If I want to just save that newly cropped document back to a .jpg, I have to flatten the image which creates another step or thing to do.  Then Adobe suggested to use the crop tool to keep the image centered and then just save it as a copy.  Well then that created yet another issue, you now have 2 documents, the original and now a copy.  I don't need or desire another copy, I'm just lookig to keep my cropped doument centered on my screen without needing to add any more mouse clicks, or copies, etc.  If it can't be done then I'm Ok with that b

Hey ,  if you are editing the keywords for many images , it would be so helpfull if there was a "floating info" panel for these informations.if we could get this information while hoping from one image to the next we also could easly see if there is an image without info.  The same is true for Adobe Bridge !  cheers Peter   

I was wondering if there were any android tablet apps that are available which can connect to my PC allowing me to use my tablet for various shortcuts and functions within my PC version of Photoshop?

How do I hide the marching ants around a selection in the iPad version of Photoshop? In regular Photoshop there's a key command ⌘H but with no keyboard I don't know what to do. Thanks

PLEASE give us a feature in the Settings that allows us to choose to turn off the Pixel Grid by default.  It's so inefficent to have to manually turn it off on every single file, even when using keyboard shortcuts.  The Pixel Grid used to be hidden by default.  I don't know why Adobe found it nessary to change to be shown by default.Adobe PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let users choose for themselves and add a checkbox to the Setting dialong window.

I don't think the price is high but the main point is do we want to buy or rent or both buy and rent but now there is only one option just rent or subscribe everyone wants to support the original program but I am a minority who choose not to rent or pay monthly yearly for temporary use in the future there may be more options such as buy and use permanently no need to rent monthly yearly or may add a free option that can be used permanently but may be able to use only some things which the free option is in many antivirus programs that have free and premium options.

I currently utilize the keyboard shortcut to move all video targets up or down in Adobe Premiere, which is a valuable feature for copying clips across tracks. However, I propose adding a similar or new keyboard shortcut to move source patching up or down. This would significantly streamline the workflow when inserting or overriding clips from the source monitor, as it would eliminate the need to manually adjust source patching.Benefits:Increased efficiency: By automating the process of moving source patching, users can save time and focus on creative tasks.Improved workflow: A dedicated keyboard shortcut would provide a more intuitive and streamlined experience for editing and post-production.Enhanced productivity: By reducing manual steps, users can potentially increase their overall productivity.Possible Solutions:New keyboard shortcut: Assign a unique keyboard combination to move source patching up or down.Option within existing shortcut: Add an option to the existing "Move All Vide

the app frame under windows is extremely getting in the way of my photoshop workflow. having used PS since the early 90s on macs, the last 10 years i was working more on PCs. not having the app frame as an optional item in photoshop is annoying.please make the app frame optional under windows. feel free to turn the app frame on by default, so most windows users won't get confused.

For a lot of poeple now using stiching software, doing large format printing, or digital muraling, we're limited by a 4gb tiff limit. This means for prints bigger than around 15ft x 9 ft we need to start chopping ppi to export as a tiff. As someone who works with tech often printing 40ft murals, it would be so helpful to be able to save as Big Tiff files instead of just Tiff. I know this is felt by many people in the gigapixel and large print world. 

In my campaign to try to release HDR paintings I discovered an annoyance with saving the format that might actually see broad support (thats not JXR) AVIF due to it's compression (in my test a 8GB JXL is 200kb in AVIF both HDR) Then i tried to save one of these files and it took me a LONG time to figure out how, and it turns out I had to open camera raw which is split between a filter version and an entire other interface I had never used before.  The simple thing is just let people normally save an AVIF like they can HDR and EXR rather than having to go through the roudabout process of opening camera raw, the other one not the one in the filter menu I guess. This is just confusing and frustrating for no reason. At the very least make opening Camera Raw easier, like this old thread says.Re: how do you open a photo in Camera Raw without ... - Adobe Support Community - 2812875 I don't need bridge, don't make me have bridge to open a photoshop feature, or have to

I applaud that Adobe wishes to promote transparency around the use of AI in imagery.However, forcing the addition of Content Credentials (CCs) is a bad move for several reasons:The whole point of the AI debate is that humans should be in control, not computers. Forcing CCs is exactly the opposite of this. The chain of trust must always begin and end with humans, not software. That's the whole point.Minor use of AI to touch up a photo is basically equivalent to Content-Aware Fill or Healing Brush, or traditional airbrushing.It is actually less transparent. Adobe does not make it clear if there is a threshold for the amount of AI usage that triggers the forced addition of CCs. Clarifying this threshold doesn't help. No threshold can truly reflect usage of AI that is deceptive vs benign.People already know that images – even before the age of AI – can't always be trusted. CCs don't really add anything to this, in fact they create a false sense of security when CCs are absent.It is trivial

Hey guys.There are two shortcuts there that are only enabled when using the pen tool. They are PLUS and MINUS.＋: Combine Shapes－: Substruct Front Shape   Currently, these tool tips do not appear in the application.It used to be displayed. This is a capture from version 6.0, although I only have the Japanese version.   I tend to unintentionally press the MINUS when I accidentally press the keyboard shortcut for zooming out, especially in the case of the MINUS.I have seen this many times confuse beginners who are not used to dealing with paths.I have also never seen a user make effective use of PLUS and MINUS.The default is “Exclude Overlapping Shapes” at the bottom. These two keyboard shortcuts are not user editable.I think they should be eliminated.Or they should be editable.

Dear PS team,Please add a function to Photoshop running on Windows to turn the application frame on and off, similar to the Mac version of the app. As a PS user since the early 90s, and having abandoned Mac as my main work platform a couple of years ago, I find the PS application frame the largest hinderence to work efficiency, and a large source of extra clicks and general annoyance working in PS. My work requires me to work on many files, doing small and short tasks, on my 3-screen desktop setup, and the app frame is just uselessly in the way all the time.  PS team, please consider this for the next release.

Buenas tardes, creo que poder utilizar como minimo dos fotografias de referencia a la vez en I.A generativa, podria servir para enriquecer aun mas la creacion de imagenes, no solo una como es el caso, supongoque tecnicamente es posible, muchas gracias, saludos

I feel like I'm missing something basic, and I can't quite seem to find the right search terms. Basically, I want the contents (controls) inside the Properties panel to scale along with the size of the panel. As you can see in my amazing attached image, I wanted to tweak an image just a little using the Levels mask. However, it's very tiny, so I pulled it from the panel group and dragged the window larger. I was rather surprised to see that the actual controls didn't scale with the size of the panel, leaving me with the same size control in a comically large window. Please tell me that I am missing something basic, because while this is equal parts aggravating and amusing, I'd rather have it work how I expect! (This is Photoshop v25.10.0 on Windows 10)

I've reciently been working with photoshop to creat pages for journals and the file image size provides wiggle room. When I get a page done I have to crop to the shape I need, then do save as (to whatever file type), and then undo back to before the crop with ever page. I was thinking if the was a Save Selection As, I could skip the cropping. Just control click a presetup block of the correct size and shape on a layer just for that and Save Selection As and just deselect.

I’d like to be able to accentuate the larger divisions of a 4x4 guide layout from those of an 8x8 grid layout, so that I have the benefit of the detailed 8x8 grid but don’t get lost in it when I transfer a design displayed in Photoshop to paper. Photoshop already gives us three tools that help, but don’t quite get there: 1) Line Paths could be used to set up resizeable grids, to be stroked with different colors/ thicknesses. That actually would work perfectly for associating lines with particular layers, by grouping. But for standard grids, it is inexact. 2) New Guide lets us set color independently for individual guides. Theoretically, that could be used along with W/H info and a calculator to set up a multi-color 8x8 grid—by 14 tedious steps! It’s just no go. 3) New Guide Layout effectively allows us to make thicker lines by specifying a >0 gutter. But I want to be able to superimpose that guttered, thick (4x4) layout with a gutterless, thin (8x8) layout in a d

I recently upgraded to Photoshop 2024.  In the new version, the default use of the green + button in the top left corner of a file window has switched from the classic MacOS input of "reisze window to match its content" to the newer "enter and exit full screen mode".  This is both unnecessary as the letter f in Photoshop already toggles among the 3 full screen modes, and it's also actually a trap - since Photoshop doesn't have any way to exit that window from full screen mode once I’ve clicked the familiar green button (expecting it to do what it’s always done). Please upgrade Photoshop so that the green button reverts back to its traditional functionality? Or at least please make a way to exit full screen mode once I’ve accidentally activated it?  Thank you 

Hi Everybody, Now if there's a way to do this, hoorah, but I really don't think there is and there should be. Photoshop needs to have linking capability similar to InDesign and After Effects where I can create an array of elements/objects and link them to various external images. Right now, in Photoshop if you Link to File (or Re-link to File) and you have four instances of this link, it will change all of the linked images. This is good, but if I have e.g. 4 different thumbnails (or storyboard frames) I don't want them all to change. The only way to create separation with this linkage is to flatten the image which is destructive and resets the scaling % and anything else similarly, fx etc. that was done to it which makes more work. So I then have to do that all over again or everything has to be embedded for every single instance. It would be SO NICE to just be able to "pop and swap" externally linked images to make an array without having to flatten and re-purpose each