Stock

Hi, I have 75 Plan Credits on my Adobe account for school; I was able to license images and 3d assets a month ago. I am trying to license for the first time since then and all stock images now have "(On-demand - CAD $12.99)" on the standard license. When I click license literally nothing happens, doesn't let me use my credits or even pay for the image for 12.99. I don't know what to do or if my credits expired or something.

I once registered an account with Adobe Stock Contributor as a seller. But about a year ago, the company that operated this email service simply shut it down, and now I can't access my email. As a result, I can't use my account on other computers because I need to enter a verification code sent to my email. To add an additional email address, I have to enter this code again. Is there a way to resolve this issue? Is there a way to resolve the issue privately, providing all the necessary proof? Or is it possible to receive this verification code on my phone instead of by email?

absolutely atrocious ai art being pushed on my search despite opting out of it in my settings. the slop that is being put out there is so badly done its nearly laughable how they charge so much money for this service. i’ve seen art in preschools more sensical than this pile of lines

I'm getting a TON of rejections of what I think are pretty good AI generated images for "Quality Issues". I understand the ones that are "Similar in library" because how many of the same image do you need, but there's no reason for all of these to be getting hit with quality rejections.Do you agree?Here are a couple of examples:https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3zbif3btm4af08yvsj96y/001_colorful-plant-forward-lunch-bowls-on-natural-table.jpeg?rlkey=t7w9zimenhvsbrhj3jx0fd7md&dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/lt6imaqexu80w17z6pqdl/002_neatly-arranged-pantry-shelves-with-jars-baskets-and-staple-foods.jpeg?rlkey=4gvsp1v2l1gtubrgbv8yjivjb&dl=0

Desde el 6 de Abril tengo problemas al momento de querer abrir archivos subí en la nube en illustrator, ahora no puedo subir archivos tampoco, cerré sesión muchas veces, los demás programas los abren perfectamente, pero tengo ese problema con illustrator, gracias y espero poder resolver esto :(

Please explain why I keep getting “Quality Issues” if I’m using your tools,  Firefly, Photoshop and Lightroom. It’s no fun if your programs don’t produce the QUALITY necessary  for Stock and commercial use. You need to EXPLAIN what and why my image is not accepted so in the future I can produce acceptable submissions. Otherwise what am I paying for? And going to the community for explanations is not really helpful. As they don’t have a clear answer. and you can’t upload the full sized file. You need much better feedback than just saying Quality Issues etc. 

Searching Adobe Stock is extremely frustrating! I shouldn’t have to spend HOURS looking for photos and images. I’m finding it really difficult to narrow down results in Adobe Stock when I’m looking for very specific compositions (like side angle, over-the-shoulder, or device-focused shots).Are there specific keywords or search strategies that actually help refine results? The filters are of little to no use. For example, if I exclude all people, 40% of the results still show people in them. Also, does Adobe Stock support any kind of Boolean operators or advanced search syntax (like using +, AND/OR, etc.) to make searches more precise?Any additional insight is greatly appreciated! TIA!

I routinely find images that are clearly generated by AI image generators, but there is no indication in the description that they are. Generally it's missing fingers, or lighting or something else that gives it away, but my concern is that Adobe's team is not filtering all of these images well enough. I definitely see value in AI images, but I don't want to be downloading something that I think is a real image, when it is not. This is misleading at the least.    Example https://stock.adobe.com/images/santa-cooking/550542006?prev_url=detail

Started a free trial, but quickly found that most images are AI generated, not real photos, so I canceled.  If I  wanted AI images instead of real photos I can create them myself with my own tools without paying Adobe Stock $30 per month. Very disappointing.  I expected more from Adobe.

Photo edit karne Liye  

Since, after searching many previous posts here, there is apparently no way to report individual assets for their quality, issues, or misleading descriptions, other than entering into a long, complicated chat window or reporting it here publicly, I will report it here. The user "Kartick" has numerous vector line icon assets that claim in both the thumbnail image and the description to have an "editable stroke." The two that I have licensed do not have an editable stroke and I would assume that is true for the rest of their assets. The assets that I downloaded and confirmed do not have an editable stroke are: #1321977567 and #1318359047. Thankfully I have an education license through my employer, so wasting an asset download isn't a big deal for me, but if I had paid for this individually, I would be very upset. Just trying to prevent someone else from having this happen to them. Thank you.

https://stock.adobe.com/images/set-of-palm-trees-coconut-tree-palm-trees-silhouette/1324286057?prev_url=detailThis assset advertises a vector file but it's just a bitmap embedded in a AI file. Where can I report this directly to support to obtain the correct format?

1923665310 is not a vector as advertised. 

Hello,I mistakenly download a image  (image ID: #1870201887), can I please get the credit refunded? thank you very much.

Can you please inprove your Exclude People filter? I am looking for images of beaches without people in the shot. I checked the "Exclude People" box and still SO many of the images are of people, some not even at the beach. Why have a filter that doesn't do what it is supposed to? 

Hola, quisiera pedir orientación sobre una compra accidental en Adobe Stock.Hoy a las 2:54 AM compré por error la imagen AdobeStock_123254108, ya que pensé que estaba incluida dentro del plan mensual de Adobe Stock que ya pago actualmente.La descargué bajo esa suposición, pero me di cuenta de que había sido un cargo adicional hasta que recibí el correo de confirmación de compra.Intenté contactar a soporte el mismo día en cuanto lo noté, pero no había agentes disponibles.¿Alguien ha pasado por una situación similar y ha logrado que se revise o reembolse la compra?Agradecería mucho cualquier orientación sobre la mejor forma de proceder.¡Gracias!

Good morning, we had about 260 credits on our Adobe Stock account, and they were suddenly removed.

I have had several audio assets flagged for copyright claims on YouTube. Often times, these claims are being initiated by Adobe's partners (i.e. Epidemic Sound) I've disputed these with YouTube and put in the asset license in the dispute but the partners don't remove the claim and we have to wait 30 days for it to be removed. In the meantime, YouTube appears to be holding back putting these videos in searches because our views are down on all the videos that have claims.  The problem is that once you submit the dispute, there is no other recourse in YouTube I think Adobe needs to clear things up with their partners and with YouTube to prevent this from continually happening. Considering how many people use Adobe products to produce YouTube content, this should be a no brainer. If anyone has any other work around for this issue, I'd love to hear it.

Adobe promised me to give unlimited access for generating Ai image and video if i buy Adobe Firefly Pro Plus membership / subscription , but only in three days i am asked to pay again for i have paid already and my services has been stopped

Cancel my account immediately. I’m being charged nearly $100 for Photoshop plus my £70 subscription, including an unauthorized £19.99. Fix this now or I will dispute charges via my bank and report to consumer protection.

When I download stock graphics, half the time it is an editable graphic but the other half, it is simply an image. They are listed/descripted/labeled the exact same in Stock. It is a waste of money.  For example, I downloade  File #:  1938249495 expecting to easily pull out one of the icons, but it’s an image so I’ll need to image trace, etc. to have it usable. For comparison, File #:  201379547 when downloaded is fully editable graphics. Am I doing something wrong or is this yet another Adobe issue to continuously deal with?

Most of the images in this contributer's account are labeled as being AI generated. But the images in this series (linked to below) are not, even though they most likely are AI generated as well. https://stock.adobe.com/search?filters%&serie_id=572848402

Searching Stock for “ipad” produces mostly images of iPhones or generic tablets, even if I enclose the search term in quotes. More specific searches are actually worse, e. g. searching for “ipad apps” (to get a picture showing an iPad with app icons on the screen.).The results are so bad, they amount to a bug. Are you allowing your contributors to use incorrect keywords to hijack your search results? If so … don’t. See: Stock search engine | Community Consistently Irrelevant Search Results on Adobe Stock | Community Why is Stock Adobe search so bad?? | Community Improve Stock Search, Please God!!!! | CommunityThere are other reports.Fix it.

I downloaded what supposed to be a vector or svg file, file #1942260536, when it is actually just a jpeg. Please refund the credit. Looking at numerous complain and refund request, with same issue, which is an image that has been labeled as vector, Adobe stock should some sort of quality control of the vector that has been submitted. Is there penalties for artists who submitted and tag it wrong? If not, there should be. This is wasted time on.