Stock

Merhaba,Son zamanlarda gönderdiğim videolardan biri reddedildi. Reddedilme bildiriminde daha fazla bilgi için bir bağlantı vardı, ancak ona tıkladığımda beni "404 Sayfa Bulunamadı" hatasına yönlendiriyor.Ayrıca, videomun tam başlığını Adobe Stock'ta aratarak "benzer içerik" nedeniyle reddedilip reddedilmediğini kontrol ettim, ancak platformda başlığıma veya konseptime uyan hiçbir video bulamadım.Lütfen reddedilmenin gerçek nedenini anlamama ve bozuk bağlantı sorununu düzeltmeme yardımcı olabilir misiniz?Yardımınız için şimdiden teşekkür ederim.

Many vector assets are falsely described as “Editable Stroke” or not marked as AI Generated and after downloading turn out to be either live-traced slop or AI generate and not usable for my needs. I make sure to toggle ‘Exclude GenAI Content” on every search as I don’t want any AI generated images. This is a waste of credits. I wish there was an easier why to report problematic AI generated images besides posting on this forum.@Contributor1The following images are my most recent issues:193209407420146011341649857678

This happens in Safari, but not Google Chrome.Clicking on a stock item from the filter search results used to open the details of the item and preview.  Now it opens an “AI Studio” (whatever the f that is - I have no interest).Does anybody know how to stop this happening in Safari?  Obviously the work around is use Chrome instead, but it’s irritating.

Since a week or so ago, every time I click on a stock item - video or image - it opens an “AI studio” instead of opening up the file details for the item.This happens in Safari but not Google Chrome.Of course the work around is to use Google Chrome, but it’s irritating as I use Safari for other tasks. 

I haven't been able to upload my work as a contributor all day. Does anyone know what's wrong? I've tried using different browsers.

 I have just licensed 3 images that are meant to be editable and usable vectors, but they are flat vector, and uneditable and unuseable due to the background being there. This is really frustrating as my wi=ork is now on hold as I cannot source usable images Images62625534613974676571546289240

I'm just looking for images I can use as general anatomy practice while drawing, and I found this abomination (file number 677462298). I always exclude AI generated images and look for photos, and I immediately knew it was AI because horses do not move like that. It's a biomechanical impossibility. There is no option to report trash like this on the preview page, I looked through the support pages, and the only directions I got from Google - which, btw, are better than what your site gave me, Adobe - were to the forums. Now, I'd've much rather have just submitted a report and called it good, but you left me with no other option than going public with my grievances. Do better, Adobe.

I downloaded an ‘editable stroke’ file. It is not editable. It removes a download from my licence. Download number is: #2104595918 and by contributor ‘Peace’. Anyone got some advice?

no puedo acceder al historial de elementos generados, la pagina se queda cargando y no muestra nada

Ich möchte ein Bild zurückgeben weil es mir nichts nützt. Falsch vom Ersteller gekennzeichent. Ich wollte ein 360° Panorama und das Bild ist nur ein einfaches Panorama. Bildnr. 307584234

Hello, I would like to report the following assets for not disclosing that they’re Generative AI and showing up in search results despite “Exclude Generative AI” being selected: Vsai young woman enjoying cycling with backpack, healthy lifestyle Stock Vector | Adobe StockVsai young women friends riding scooter traveling together Stock Vector | Adobe Stock (this one also has the Nike swoosh symbol which is trademarked)Vsai happy woman riding a red scooter during summer travel Stock Vector | Adobe Stockcruise squad funny summer vacation cruise matching Stock Illustration | Adobe Stocksummer vacation background Stock Illustration | Adobe StockCancun Mexico Vacation Beach 2025 Trip Stock Vector | Adobe StockLiving The Dream One Bad Decision At a Time Raccoon Cowboy Stock Vector | Adobe StockSummer vacation t-shirt design. Stock Vector | Adobe StockYoung Man Playing Acoustic Guitar While Camping Illustration Stock Vector | Adobe StockSummer vacation t-shirt design. Stock Vector | Adobe Stock

If I have purchased an adobeStock Image with a standard license - does that license allow me to then edit or modify that stock image in a 3rd party AI software

If I have purchased an AdobeStock Image with a standard license - does that license allow me to then edit or modify that stock image in a 3rd party AI software

вернуть деньги

Hello,My first asset was approved and I received the approval email. However, it still does not appear on my public profile. My portfolio shows 1 asset, but clicking the File ID opens a “Page Not Found” page, and the asset cannot be found in my portfolio search.File ID: 2118013779Could you please check whether there is an indexing or publishing issue with my contributor account?Thank you.

Dear Adobe Community,I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding a recent issue I have encountered while using Adobe Express, specifically relating to the use of assets from a contributor whose account has now been deactivated by Adobe Stock.Approximately 2 to 3 days after downloading and utilizing these assets in my designs, I attempted to revise my work, only to find that I could no longer access the downloaded files due to the contributor's account being banned. This unexpected action has not only hindered my workflow but has also resulted in significant losses for both myself and the affected contributor.In my efforts to seek assistance, I have reached out to Adobe support through various channels, including multiple chat agents and emails, yet I have received no responses or resolutions to date. This lack of communication is concerning and raises questions about the fairness of the policies in place that affect the user experience and the livelihood of individual contributo

Hello,I just bought This item from Adobe Stock. As a thumbnail everything seems fine but these items are just badly image-traced and resold, making them unusable in any way possible because of the horrendous quality of the vector. My question is; how can I report things like this? The specific user's profile seems to be full with subpar traced vectors that he is selling on Adobe Stock. I know I can't get a refund for the digital download but this is just rediculous. Please remove these items and if possible, give me my credit back.

As stated above, any RGB images imported into photoshop have completely incorrect color profiles. This can only be fixed by changing the color profile from RGB to LAB. 

I use Adobe Stock for a website that covers steampunk news. I also run profiles of steampunk artists. Many artists in the steampunk world are up in arms about generative AI. Some have day jobs as designers and illustrators and see this as an existential threat to their livelihoods.That's not hyperbole. I know a mid-career designer/illustrator who has been asking friends for advice about making a career change. Then, of course, are all the issues surrounding how the AI models were trained (using copyrighted images on the web). As a result, I have publicly stated that I will NOT use AI-generated content on my site unless its for articles ABOUT generative AI.Here are the problems as this relates to Adobe Stock: First, the Adobe Stock interface offers no way to filter out AI-generated images, which means I'm wasting a lot of time looking at images I won't use due to my policy. Second, not all AI-generated images are clearly labeled as such. Some have tags that say "AI," but otherwise there

Whenever I search for anything when logged into my adobe stock account it comes up with a page not found error message whereas when I search when logged out, I can see all images. When I try to go to my library to see images I have already liked, i get another error message saying my request could not be processed. Any idea what is going on? 

File 2023690189 looks like a typical autotraced image.Plus: it contains far too many anchor points and curves are wonky. Not what I expected.​@Contributor1