Design the future of fashion, win Firefly Pro 👗✨
Connect with creators in the official Stock community.
Recently active
This happens in Safari, but not Google Chrome.Clicking on a stock item from the filter search results used to open the details of the item and preview. Now it opens an “AI Studio” (whatever the f that is - I have no interest).Does anybody know how to stop this happening in Safari? Obviously the work around is use Chrome instead, but it’s irritating.
Since a week or so ago, every time I click on a stock item - video or image - it opens an “AI studio” instead of opening up the file details for the item.This happens in Safari but not Google Chrome.Of course the work around is to use Google Chrome, but it’s irritating as I use Safari for other tasks.
I haven't been able to upload my work as a contributor all day. Does anyone know what's wrong? I've tried using different browsers.
I have just licensed 3 images that are meant to be editable and usable vectors, but they are flat vector, and uneditable and unuseable due to the background being there. This is really frustrating as my wi=ork is now on hold as I cannot source usable images Images62625534613974676571546289240
I'm just looking for images I can use as general anatomy practice while drawing, and I found this abomination (file number 677462298). I always exclude AI generated images and look for photos, and I immediately knew it was AI because horses do not move like that. It's a biomechanical impossibility. There is no option to report trash like this on the preview page, I looked through the support pages, and the only directions I got from Google - which, btw, are better than what your site gave me, Adobe - were to the forums. Now, I'd've much rather have just submitted a report and called it good, but you left me with no other option than going public with my grievances. Do better, Adobe.
I downloaded an ‘editable stroke’ file. It is not editable. It removes a download from my licence. Download number is: #2104595918 and by contributor ‘Peace’. Anyone got some advice?
no puedo acceder al historial de elementos generados, la pagina se queda cargando y no muestra nada
Ich möchte ein Bild zurückgeben weil es mir nichts nützt. Falsch vom Ersteller gekennzeichent. Ich wollte ein 360° Panorama und das Bild ist nur ein einfaches Panorama. Bildnr. 307584234
Right now, the ‘report issue’ mechanism is insufficient. At present you can only report on 2 issues - names of people included in the artwork and IP infringement.In brief, we should be able to report on issues such as:• poor quality• inappropriate/explicit/insensitive content• unflagged AI content or image traced AI vectorsSince adobe have shown no particular inclination to moderate the content that ‘contributors’ are producing, at the very least they should allow users to report/flag content that does not meet quality expectation as well as unflagged AI images, AI images that have been image traced and passed off as human creation, images that claim to be vector but are an embedded raster image (downloaded one of those the other day) or images that may be culturally, morally or ideologically problematic.In a few other posts, there’s also been suggestion of user ratings for content, which I fully support.
If I have purchased an adobeStock Image with a standard license - does that license allow me to then edit or modify that stock image in a 3rd party AI software
If I have purchased an AdobeStock Image with a standard license - does that license allow me to then edit or modify that stock image in a 3rd party AI software
вернуть деньги
Hello,My first asset was approved and I received the approval email. However, it still does not appear on my public profile. My portfolio shows 1 asset, but clicking the File ID opens a “Page Not Found” page, and the asset cannot be found in my portfolio search.File ID: 2118013779Could you please check whether there is an indexing or publishing issue with my contributor account?Thank you.
Adobe Stock is currently very difficult to use professionally because of the flooding of low-grade AI generated vector assets.I would like to suggest a feature that would inform the user better of the actual quality of the file before deciding to download it.For example:Misleading thumbnail of a trashy, unusable, likely AI Generated stock asset. Note the useless filter on the left.Upon seeing this asset I imaging I can easily select objects to hide or recolor them, include products or texts behind some of the vegetal elements.Unfortunately upon download and inspection, the file is trash and unusable. Removing elements creates a hole in the illustration. Selecting an element to recolor or hide it is useless, as it also selects neighboring elements that merge with it.The Layers panels is an unfathomable sea of unlabeled elements that i do not wish to navigate. I think that I was misled by this thumbnail and wish Adobe would offer more information about the file to prevent feeling misled
Dear Adobe Community,I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding a recent issue I have encountered while using Adobe Express, specifically relating to the use of assets from a contributor whose account has now been deactivated by Adobe Stock.Approximately 2 to 3 days after downloading and utilizing these assets in my designs, I attempted to revise my work, only to find that I could no longer access the downloaded files due to the contributor's account being banned. This unexpected action has not only hindered my workflow but has also resulted in significant losses for both myself and the affected contributor.In my efforts to seek assistance, I have reached out to Adobe support through various channels, including multiple chat agents and emails, yet I have received no responses or resolutions to date. This lack of communication is concerning and raises questions about the fairness of the policies in place that affect the user experience and the livelihood of individual contributo
Hello,I just bought This item from Adobe Stock. As a thumbnail everything seems fine but these items are just badly image-traced and resold, making them unusable in any way possible because of the horrendous quality of the vector. My question is; how can I report things like this? The specific user's profile seems to be full with subpar traced vectors that he is selling on Adobe Stock. I know I can't get a refund for the digital download but this is just rediculous. Please remove these items and if possible, give me my credit back.
As stated above, any RGB images imported into photoshop have completely incorrect color profiles. This can only be fixed by changing the color profile from RGB to LAB.
I use Adobe Stock for a website that covers steampunk news. I also run profiles of steampunk artists. Many artists in the steampunk world are up in arms about generative AI. Some have day jobs as designers and illustrators and see this as an existential threat to their livelihoods.That's not hyperbole. I know a mid-career designer/illustrator who has been asking friends for advice about making a career change. Then, of course, are all the issues surrounding how the AI models were trained (using copyrighted images on the web). As a result, I have publicly stated that I will NOT use AI-generated content on my site unless its for articles ABOUT generative AI.Here are the problems as this relates to Adobe Stock: First, the Adobe Stock interface offers no way to filter out AI-generated images, which means I'm wasting a lot of time looking at images I won't use due to my policy. Second, not all AI-generated images are clearly labeled as such. Some have tags that say "AI," but otherwise there
I've seen several other posts in other threads saying this but I just wanted to add my voice to the chorus and say that as a user of stock photography I'm sick of AI-generated images showing up in my searches even when I've selected to exclude them in the filters. There are certain users who keep showing up in my searches as doing this (when you go on their libraries it's wall-to-wall AI stuff, so I have to imagine it's an intentional thing). From what I've read this isn't against the rules currently but I just wanted to say I think it should be, and I'd like to be able to report or flag these posts. I know I can't do much as an artist against the tide of AI art but the least we can do is keep it separated from the more thoughtfully created stuff. Thanks!
Whenever I search for anything when logged into my adobe stock account it comes up with a page not found error message whereas when I search when logged out, I can see all images. When I try to go to my library to see images I have already liked, i get another error message saying my request could not be processed. Any idea what is going on?
File 2023690189 looks like a typical autotraced image.Plus: it contains far too many anchor points and curves are wonky. Not what I expected.@Contributor1
When I search for images and use the “exclude AI-generated images” filter, there are still many clearly AI-generated images showing up, which is frustrating. If contributor tagging cannot be controlled because it may be done maliciously, then please allow users to exclude those results for their own protection. I would like to be able to exclude specific contributors from the search results. It would also be useful to set multiple contributors, and I would appreciate it if those settings could be saved and kept once registered. Thank you.
I didn't realize I have been subscribing to Adobe Stock for 7 months until I check the billing information on my account today. I have checked other posts on the same topic and over 90% of them face the same issue as I do-- they subscribe to a year plan for adobe stock without knowing about it. Adobe will give you one month for free but fail to inform you that will be charged $30 USD per month for the next year. Now, neither could I cancel the subscription to Adobe Stock because I 'subscribed' to a year plan nor would I add money to my credit card to have Adobe continuously charges me until I receive my refund for all the money that I pay for Adobe Stock and have my subscription to Adobe Stock canceled. It is difficult to believe a big corporate like Adobe would use such a cheap method to steal money from their customers. It is really disappointing. It is basically a scam and I need a proper explanation for it!
Hey Adobe! How do I keep my accumulated credits if I cancel my subscription???????
Remix with Firefly Community Gallery
Thousands of free creations to fall in love with and remix in Firefly.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.