Similar to an echa sketch with a ruler and turning the image measurements different pecils from super fine to very bold grey Upload feature to the patent website to see it their idea has already been thought of on screen 3d images.
I find your platform interesting, but if I can't try it out for video creation, how do you expect me to subscribe? Bad, bad
no me deja generar imagenes ni videos con ningun modelo de ia me da error en todo he probado videos diferentes imagenes distintas y en todo me da error [profanity removed by moderator] quiero solucion ya estoy perdiendo dias de trabajo
In Audio Translate feature - Allow to edit the Transcript before generating the video, this way we can make changes in the script before AI generates. Currently as you dont allow it, we are regenrating scripts again and again
Estou a tentar fazer uns melhoramentos numa imagem mas o botão de gerar não fica azul, porquê?
Remove Tool appears to clamp HDR values in a 32-bit documentI am using Photoshop 27.9.1 with a 32-bit/channel image in a VFX workflow.I used the Remove Tool to remove the text from a very bright area of the image.At normal exposure, the result looks clean and the removed area blends in well with the surrounding image, as shown in the first two attached images.However, when I lower the exposure to inspect the HDR information, the area processed with the Remove Tool becomes clearly visible. It appears that the generated pixels are being limited or clamped, while the original surrounding pixels retain their higher HDR values.The three attached images show: Original image – before removing the text. After using the Remove Tool – at normal exposure, the result appears clean. After lowering the exposure – the area processed by the Remove Tool becomes clearly visible because its brightness range no longer matches the surrounding HDR pixels. This may not be noticeable when exporting to an SDR format such as JPEG, but it becomes a significant issue when the edited 32-bit image is exported as an EXR for compositing. The Remove Tool area can then become visible when exposure or grading is changed later in the VFX pipeline.Since the Remove Tool now supports 32-bit documents, I expected it to preserve or reconstruct HDR values above 1.0 rather than limiting the generated result to the SDR range.Am I using the Remove Tool incorrectly, or is preserving HDR values above 1.0 currently a limitation of the Remove Tool in 32-bit documents?If there is a setting or workflow that allows the Remove Tool to preserve the full HDR range when working with 32-bit EXR images, I would appreciate any guidance. Original imageAfter using the Remove ToolAfter lowering the exposure
Add and subtracting masks is very useful in refining your mask. Being able to add or subtract and existing mask would be (IMO) a great improvement in this feature.Many times I will labour over tweaking the mask for my subject, then I want to subtract that mast from my background so background adjustments don’t affect my subject. The background/landscape/sky masks will often include areas of the subject which interfere with processing. Here’s an example.Selecting “Subject” results in tree branches being included and misses many detailed tail feathers.Selecting (in this case) “Vegetation” includes those same tail features as part of the selection. I can spend a great deal of time painstakingly finessing my subject selection and would like to subtract that from the background.I did find this as a feature request in the Lightroom area so I hope this is not out of bounds to add to the ACR area. ACR seems to have new features tested out before being added elsewhere (and ACR is my tool of choice over Lightroom), so I’m hoping to see this in ACR.
Firefly 3 has been removed as an option in today’s beta. I would agree it’s not good for a whole lot, we find it demonstrably better with hair than Firefly 1 or Firefly Fill and Expand. Will it be removed from the release version as well? We are hoping not.
Could you please consider creating a key code to turn Trim View on and off in Illustrator? On behalf of my design team, we beg you.
I'm Brazilian and I'm trying to recreate a filter I saw on Pinterest. I'm fluent in English and I wanted to change the app's language to English as well, but I can't.
I’m a professional designer who regularly creates large-format artwork for commercial print. Until Photoshop 27.9, I was able to save my large PSB files as Photoshop PDFs, including documents exceeding 30,000 pixels in one dimension.This was not an occasional use case. It became part of my regular production workflow. My completed artwork could be maintained as a PSB and supplied to my commercial printer as a PDF, which is the delivery format they require.Since updating Photoshop, the Photoshop PDF option is no longer available for these documents. I have also tested the newly released Photoshop 27.10, and the restriction remains. I confirmed the change using existing PSB files that I had previously saved successfully as PDFs. The files have not changed. The available output options in Photoshop have.I understand from Adobe’s responses that the ability to save these documents as PDFs was the result of a previous change in Photoshop that was not originally intended. However, that behaviour was available for approximately two years. During that time, professional users working in large-format print understandably incorporated it into established production workflows.PSB and TIFF are not equivalent replacements. PSB is a working-file format and is not appropriate for delivery to many commercial printers. TIFF may be suitable in some circumstances, but when a printer requires PDF, removing PDF output creates an unnecessary additional production problem.I have now had to roll Photoshop back to version 27.8 solely to regain this functionality. That means I cannot use current versions of Photoshop without giving up an important part of my professional print workflow.Please restore the ability to save large-format documents exceeding 30,000 pixels as Photoshop PDFs, or provide a supported PDF export method for large-format commercial print work.If there is a technical reason the previous implementation cannot be restored as-is, large-format users still need a practical way to produce the PDFs our printers require without remaining indefinitely on an outdated version of Photoshop.
Hello, I just found out that you cant automatically save your projects to creative cloud.Don't get me wrong, you can autosave your projects but I think it would be really smart if your project had also a way to automatically backup to the cloud when you save it.Please make this happend 🙂
I understand from a very reliable source that CS6 and Lightroom 4 will be the last photoshop software that will be available to actually purchase and own. In other words...You will not be able to purchase the software either on a disc or download that is yours to use indefinitely once you purchase the product. It will only be available via the cloud and everyone will be required to pay monthly license fee to use the product. This will allow all upgrades as long as you pay the fee...but if you cease to pay the fee, the software will be deactivated. If this is the case...and I believe it is...THIS SUCKS! I have been Adobe user since I purchase the CS2 Creative Suite and used lightroom since it's inception. I have not purchase every upgrade, but have done so when I felt the changes warranted an upgrade. If Adobe insists on this business model, I will probably use one of the other photo editing product available on the market. There are several that will do most everything Adobe's software provides. I do not want to change...but Adobe's changes will force me to do so. I will purchase and use software...I WILL NOT "RENT" software which is what Adobe is proposing.
When naming a person Lightroom pops up a face and asks if it is the same person. The picture shown is just the face, and it is not very clear or else there would not be any question.The choices are Yes / no. please add a way to view the complete picture(s) of the face in question as part of the choices. Now I have to say NO then search for the picture to be sure.
Я пытаюсь использовать генерацию ИИ видео . И не работает генерация.
allow the use of swimming suits and bikinis
I bought iPad Pro, but I can't add captions to multiple photos at once, something I can do on Samsung devices
I would like to suggest an optional Emergency Offline Access feature for active Creative Cloud subscribers.The idea is not to replace the normal Creative Cloud subscription. It would be a premium add-on for users who may unexpectedly need to work in an environment where Internet access is completely unavailable.For example, Adobe could offer a secure USB hardware token containing a fixed reserve of offline working time — perhaps 1,000 hours.The important part is that these hours would not expire with calendar time. The token could remain unused for months or even years. Time would only be deducted while Adobe applications are actually running under the emergency offline license.A possible model: the user must have a valid Creative Cloud subscription when purchasing the token; the Emergency Offline Token is purchased separately as a premium add-on; unused hours do not expire; the token works without Internet access or Adobe activation servers; one physical token permits only one active computer at a time; usage time is stored securely on the token and cannot be reset by changing the Windows clock or reinstalling the operating system; when the token is removed or Adobe applications are closed, the usage counter stops. The purpose is not to obtain Adobe software more cheaply.The value is certainty.There are situations where the computer works, the software is installed, all necessary project files are local, but connectivity is unavailable: remote locations, isolated or secure networks, ships, industrial facilities, field work, infrastructure failures, disaster recovery situations, or simply an unexpected loss of network access.In such a situation, licensing should ideally not be the only reason otherwise functional software cannot be used.I would personally be willing to pay a significant premium — potentially even close to the price of another standard license — for such an emergency reserve.This could therefore be positioned not as an alternative to Creative Cloud, but as an additional product:Creative Cloud + Emergency Offline AccessIn other words, the customer would be paying not for another installation, but for the confidence that familiar professional tools will remain available when normal online activation is impossible.
I create shapes with gradient fill for lower thirds and there is no snapping in program window for the gradient control.I have to drag guides and align it manually and it is not exact.Holding Shift while moving the gradient line control should snap it in 0-45-90 degrees as with any other tool in CS.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.