Build better products with our product team
I've just filed a feature request to update the FAQ page https://help.myportfolio.com/hc/en-us/articles/360036483773-Embed-module to include code to embed an Instagram grid. The code is: <iframe src="http://instagram.com/USERNAME/embed" width="800" height="800" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe> The crucial details are: that the Instagram USERNAME is followed by "/embed" that in Instagram > Settings > Sharing and Re-use, you need to enable Website embeds
I'm not sure if this is across Windows as well, but I'd like to see better file management in LR on MacOS. My workflow in old LRC had been dump into working folder (local to laptop); then move to final location (NAS). With the introduction of local folders, I was trying to do something similar in LR But it seems in LR, the only operation is copy, no move?Additionally, there is no choice in warning to abort/rename/continue if duplicate names exist.. it will just always create a second copy.
I use the "Make a Second Copy To" feature all the time. I find it invaluable. If I stuff up and lose an image or deleate and realise I need it some days later, it's a God send. It's much easier to retreive recent images that way than from a full backup. Of course the Lightroom 2nd Copy file builds up very quickly. Every now and again I'll go into it and deleate anything more than about 2 calendar months old. We have such good facility to clean out old previews. Can't we have something similar for the Lightroom 2nd Copy file?
Either along the top bar or along the bottom bar or as an image overlay (that can be toggled on/off like in LrC), please show the filename when in Detail view. This would help with identifying specific images as I scroll through, particularly when comparing two or three images (especially as 'Compare' is limited to only two images at a time). Right now, it is possible to see the filename but ONLY when the Info panel is open. This is not ideal for two reasons:(1) When comparing processing of two+ images, I need to see the Edit panel, which does not show the filename; and (2) At times, I want to close the right and left panels for larger on-screen images, therefore losing the filename in the Info panel.. Even in Compare mode, the filename is NOT shown--that's crazy!
As a fortunate participant in the Firefly Generate Video (beta), I have noticed the 'Shot size' and 'Camera angle' settings become disabled if you upload a reference image. This may be an initial limitation as the text-video generation is in its early stages. I see the use of these settings as extremely valuable in terms of what this tool can offer. In my case, I have been experimenting with creating videos based on static images created with Firefly. While I can make the static images come alive through the conversion to video, it would be useful to change the camera angle or shot type. For example, I may want a long shot or a midshot with a low angle. This would allow a user to influence the story, which is very much linked to camera angles and shot types.Screenshots without reference image Screenshot with reference image:
The JXL lib support the target_size option to target a file size when encoding.It would be nice to have it as the option -jxl_taget_size in the command line of "Adobe DNG Converter". libxjl source
Currently, the iPad and iOS versions of Lightroom offer a measly set of keyboard shortcuts that don't cover basic tasks such as mode switching between Edit, Crop, Healing, Clone modes or even applying automatic edits which seems like an awfully common task on such a platform. The full list is here at the moment and here's a screenshot from within the current version of the app for posterity. https://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom-cc/using/keyboard-shortcuts-lightroom-mobile.html Oddly there doesn't appear to be a support article from help.adobe.com about Lightroom CC keyboard shortcuts, unlike with Lightroom Classic which has a massive help document with all possible shortcuts. I've attached a screenshot of the list of available shortcuts as it appears in-app on iPadOS running v6.3.0 EC9ADC/56 when holding the Command key which is an operating system wide convention for keyboard shortcut discovery. At a glance, missing on iOS/iPadOS are the following basic shortcuts: - Command + [ or ] to rotate left or right when browsing shots - Shift + A to apply Auto Settings on currently selected image(s) - Command + C to copy all current image settings (the default behavior is akin to Shift + Command + C on iOS for some reason) - Command + Shift + C to copy specific image settings by selecting them first - E to open Edit mode - C to open Crop mode - H to open Healing Brush mode - B to open Brush mode (or Selective Edits mode as it's called on iOS) - K to open Tags - I to open Info (which is instead use to toggle through info overlays on the shot itself on iOS) - / to show or hide the Filmstrip at the bottom of the screen when browsing through shots - J to show clipping - \ to show the original photo before edits - Command + or - to zoom in on the photo - Space to toggle zoom There are also no shortcuts to: - Toggle Histogram with Command + 0 - Toggle Light settings with Command + 1 - Toggle Color settings with Command + 2 - Toggle Effects with Command + 3 - Toggle Detail with Command + 4 - Toggle Optics with Command + 5 That's just for the Photo view. I'm sure there are many more opportunities for helpful screenshots such as top-level navigation which offers nearly nothing in Grid view because the overloaded I shortcut that toggles info overlays on each photo. There are no shortcuts to: - Command + F to focus the search bar and enable filters - Alternate between square grid and original aspect ratio grid - T to add selected photos to target album (it's quite tedious to move photos to an album on iOS/iPadOS) - Command + Delete or Delete to immediately delete a photo without tapping through multiple modals I'm sure I'm forgetting a lot of other potentially useful shortcuts as well, but it would be really nice to see an update with a hefty improvement in shortcuts. Thank you.
Hi developer team , Please try to insert an option to clean studio solid backgrounds , example Wrinkle marks ect.
Photoshop should now pay a lot of attention to face editing. Some advanced AI tool should be added to its software for face retouching so that we can retouch our face properly in just one click.
The blue share button is an annoying waste of space that interrupts users' workflow since at least 2018, based on older community posts.Forgive the French setup, you can't miss how blue it is. Now, I am aware that the colour of the interface can be changed, and the colour neutralized, however, the very existence of the button and the absence of an option to remove it is the real issue here.I often work with the Photoshop window narrowed, as I have another tab on the side for reference. Narrowing the window, however, has the permanent icon list on the right of the toolbar cover the contextual tool options that Photoshop users use the program for, as seen in the screenshot below. Moreover, the very presence of this list of fixed icons on the left of the screen, completely defeats the purpose of a CONTEXTUAL toolbar. This post is specifically about the blue share button because it is thrice as large as other icons, but it is worth pointing out that there is no need for any of these icons to be immovable. I personally have no use for any of them, and if I did, I would rather find these options elsewhere than in the way of the tool I am trying to use.The share button is particularly egregious because it is for another program one requires a licence for. It's insulting that I, a paying costumer, have my workflow interrupted, because it is more important that I see a huge button for a program I do not use than I be able to use basic functions of Photoshop. A way to address this known issue that has been troubling users for six years now could beMaking the toolbar customizable: allow users to hide/display the “permanent” options on itMaking a secondary toolbar with the permanent options that users can choose to display or not display next to the actual toolbar.Altogether removing the options there. Only the blue share button and notification bell are not already options accessible through another menu. They could be moved to one. The search and tutorials are accessible through the “help” menu, and the workspace can be set in the “window” menu already, so removing them from the toolbar is inconsequential to their access. TL;DR : the blue share button has been an annoyance for users since it was introduced, and Adobe has yet to allow users to simply turn it off, an option that pretty much every single tool, menu, or button has. Please, at least pretend to your users that you care about their experience more than about them signing up to another program. (computer: MacBook Pro 2023 running Mac OS Sonoma 14.2.1. using Adobe Photoshop 2024 V26.0, up to date at the time of writing)
It would be awesome to have a dedicated Automobile or Cars category in the Lightroom community tag options. I like posting images of cars and also searching for them, and I think there are so many people that would benefit from this.
Welcome to this week's "Premiere updates that broke something which worked perfectly":I used to be able to select a bunch of clips in my timeline > Right click or KeyboardShortcut > Set To Frame Size. This would make 4K clips (for example) in my 1080p sequence shrink so they say "50%" in Effect Controls...perfect for most of the clips, except the ones I want to crop into (up to 200% losslessly, thanks to them being 4K. This is literally the main benefit of 4K workflows).Now the ability to 'undo' the Set To Frame Size is GONE. Yet somehow we have a THIRD option now.. How did this get so complicated and yet somehow completely remove the main feature we needed?There's no way to untick Set To Frame Size (sorry - just checked and it's actually renamed now to Fit To Frame, by which Adobe meant 'Shrink To Frame' because there's now a 'Fill To Frame' which means 'Expand To Frame' and the third option is 'Scale To Frame Size'...oh my gosh.... what a mess.) Please just return everything to how it was. It was perfect before. With just 2 options. Or at LEAST make Shrink To Frame Size a toggle/ ticked or unticked thing in the menu like it used to be, so I don't have to individually go through tons of clips I shrunk in my sequence and manually go to Effect Controls and one by one type into the Scale field "100%" for all the ones I want to return to original size... Aurgh.
Dear Adobe Community,I am frustrated with Adobe's Caption Editing and Options. How is it that Capcut which costs 70$ per year has more caption styles that are editable and more advanced than Premiere Pro? For Example, it would be great to have a style, where each spoken word is underlaid with a colour or highlighted. Or make it more dynamic. The captions in Premiere are terrible right now. The style options are awful and ugly. Just give me more dynamic options and then let me edit font, colour and text easily. We don't need more or I'm switching to Capcut. Thanks!
In the Device tab on the iOS app, please mark duplicate photos that are not imported. This would help the user identify duplicates in their camera roll and remind the user to not to try to import the duplicate photo again. (The app marks photos that have been imported already with an LR symbol. So it seems possible to mark duplicates.) Also in the Device tab, please add filters for duplicates and imported photos so the user can display only photos that are not duplicates and/or have not yet been imported into Lightroom.
I've just posted a feature request (via this page) to add a Reset ALL from Lightroom command which would mean that you could reset/refresh all the pages your site has linked to Lightroom in a single hit, rather than going through them one by one. Assuming others like the idea, I don't see any way to get folk to vote for this request. Is there a voting mechanism?
Why can't we copy and paste the transcript from PP into word or Apple Notes? It really is a very stupid bug. Sure i can export the whole thing into a text file and then flick between that and premiere and whatever document i'm working on, but that is a really bloody slow way of working. Why is this so complex? It seems so completely obvious.
Not sure if this needs updating in the documentation on Adobe website; Changing Color Temp Normally I set the color temp in LrC. However, I was working in PS and instead of kicking it over to LrC I looked for a way to adjust the color temp in PS. Went to the link above to see HT. Is there a panel in PS "Look"? May be add a slider to one of the Adjustment Layers to set color temperature
Hi, community. Premiere Pro has some default use of mouse buttons like the right mouse button context menu or the middle mouse button for dragging the frame in the program monitor, but no other mouse buttons are in use. Furthermore you cannot assign a mouse button to any shortcut in the shortcuts menu in Premiere Pro - it's for the keyboard only. I know I can use Excalibur and a mouse proper software to make macroses, as well as use some exotic workarounds like game controller emulators and assign shortcut combinations to any mouse button in it. But these all are awkward workarounds. So I request a feature to be able to assign shortcuts to the additional mouse buttons. It's time to put to use additional mouse buttons since now people rarely use mice with only 3 default buttons.
There is a need for an easy way to add photos to an album on iOS and iPadOS, similar to the add to target album shortcut on the desktop version. Currently, it is too cumbersome to be able to organise photos into albums on the iPad or iPhone versions of Lightroom, which is a pity as sorting photos into albums is the type of thing that could be otherwise easily done whenever you find yourself with five minutes spare and your phone to hand.
Does SP have this brush mode similar to PS?PS has this feature and so does mari.It's a pain in the ass to use projection in SP without this feature, because I want to overlay every stroke with lighten mode.Been waiting for this feature, otherwise projection drawing masks is quite a pain every time.The screenshot below is from PSHere is a comparison picture, the left side is the original picture, the middle is the way to draw mask with SP, the right picture is the effect of PS used the brush darken overlay mode.PS can realize the brush overlay mode, but SP can't, I hope that SP can have such a function, it's very practical.
Lightroom Cloud 2023 uses the ProPhoto RGB color space. This is a problem if you want to edit your photos for Instagram, which uses the sRGB color space (i.e. fewer colors). It's a problem because the entire time you're editing, you're seeing what your photo will look like in ProPhoto RGB, not sRGB. But as soon as you're done, and you export your photo to sRGB, you lose a ton of colors. And there appears to be no way to know which colors you'll lose until you go to export. I believe there is a setting called "soft proofing" in Lightroom Classic that shows which colors you will lose when exporting as sRGB. But this option does not exist in Lightroom Cloud. Can someone tell me why this seemingly enormously important feature is left out of Lightroom Cloud? I have to suspect that a majority of people using Lightroom Cloud are uploading their pictures to Instagram. Isn't everyone disappointed then, after spending all that time editing, when they finally go to export as sRGB, and they lose all of those colors? Or am I missing something? I am not an expert in color management. Only learning as I go. Thanks!
Subject: Idea for Adobe Photoshop - AI Learning and Batch Editing Dear Adobe Team, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to propose an innovative idea that could transform Adobe Photoshop into an even more efficient and indispensable tool for creative professionals like myself. The concept revolves around integrating AI-driven learning and batch editing capabilities into Adobe Photoshop. Here are the key aspects of this idea: 1. **AI Learning:** Adobe Photoshop could incorporate an AI learning system that analyzes the edits made by users during their daily creative work. The AI would recognize patterns in the editing process, such as specific adjustments, filters, or enhancements frequently applied to images. 2. **Seamless Application:** Once the AI has learned from a user's editing style, it can seamlessly apply similar edits to a batch of similar photos. For instance, if a user edits a series of images with the same model or background but different perspectives or postures, the AI can apply the learned editing skills to ensure consistency across all photos. 3. **Customizable Recommendations:** Users should have the flexibility to customize and fine-tune the AI's recommendations. This would allow for creative control and the ability to adapt the AI's suggestions to specific project requirements. 4. **Efficiency and Productivity:** This feature would not only enhance the efficiency of editing workflows but also significantly boost productivity, especially when dealing with large collections of similar images. I believe that integrating AI learning and batch editing capabilities into Adobe Photoshop could revolutionize the way creative professionals work with images. It aligns with the current trends in AI and machine learning and would make Photoshop an invaluable asset for tasks involving extensive image editing, such as fashion shoots, product catalogs, or architectural photography. While I understand that implementing such a feature would be a substantial undertaking, I believe it has the potential to set Adobe Photoshop apart from competitors and establish it as the industry standard for creative image editing. If you would like further details or examples to illustrate this concept, please feel free to reach out to me at [your email address]. Thank you for your dedication to excellence in design and creative software. I eagerly await the potential evolution of Adobe Photoshop in the future. Sincerely, [Removed by Mod]
Hi! it would be helpful to be able to filter by the keep/delete flags under the info ratings. That way I can earmark what I want to keep for edits and what I want to delete then filter down to a delete pool and mass delete all those flagged to be deleted at once. Even using a star rating system if I wanted to save space and purge on my phone e I could purge one star photos from my phone after I verified they were backed up elsewhere. I think this would be really handy.
It would be great if we also got Croatian language in the transcript and I believe that a lot of people would switch from some random applications that have that option to Premier Pro!Do you have any information about this upcoming opportunity? People, vote, so that adobe allows us to do that *_*
two adobe programs and both on 3D industry but for some reason there is no real link structure between them. When we send the painting we made in painter to stager with its object, it sends it as a new object. however, it just needs to update the changes. I can move the object from painter in stager to other places, I can put it under other objects in the scene, I can shrink and enlarge it. but then if I need to change something in painter, it goes to stager as a new object and I have to do all the placement operations again. the existing object is not updated. this is very pointless. for example, when I export a model I drew outside with the same file name, I can update this object in painter. but I can not do the same in stager. just for this reason I use another program instead of adobe's own rendering program (which works exactly as I said), while adobe stager just takes up space on my computer without ever opening 🙂
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.