Photoshop

Hi - the Gradient Map (Adjustment Layer) Editor has 2 kinds of sliders available - Color and Opacity. Color sliders work as expected - place one at the luminance value desired and select a color to be mapped to that value. Opacity should seemingly work in a similar way - place one at the luminance value desired and select an opacity level, which should determine the "intensity" of the color remapping at that particular value. So for example if you want blacks to be fully affected by the specified gradient map and whites to be completely unaffected, you would add a 100% opacity slider at the bottom end, and a 0% opacity slider at the top end, then opacity values would interpolate in betweeen. The interface also supports additional sliders, for cases where you might want more granular control. HOWEVER, the opacity sliders simply do not work in the Gradient Map (Adjustment Layer) Editor. From separate discussions, it has been suggested the mere inclusion of opacity sliders

L'importation d'un PDF contenant des calques défini dans Adobe Express, exporté depuis Adobe Expres, ne permet pas la restauration des calques dans Photoshop alors que ces calques sont bien dissociés dans Ilustrator ?Je pense que l'ajout de cette option dans PS lors de l'importation du PDF ne doit pas poser trop de problème.

Yes, there are many times when you want vector shapes to snap to the pixel grid, but there are also times where your vector paths must follow the intricate contours of the photo you're masking, pixel grid be darned. Please allow vector shapes to be moved without snapping to the pixel grid. 

It would be great to have rulers and a visual grid system on the web app

no longer relevant

i require the lasso tool 

Curves Adjustment Layers should be added to Photoshop on the Web Beta. Curves is the basic feature that I use in almost every Photoshop document that I create.   Other than that, the implementation of basic features for the web has been great. I look forward to seeing more of the advanced features added in the future.

I would love to see a way to improve how we align objects and how we align objects on screenInstead of click on three dots and change the way I want to align the object between "selection" and "screen", why not using hold SHIFT to change between these two options? Exemple:Imagine you have four object (square) and you want to (1) align them centered and then (2) align them again in the center of the canvas...   you just need to select these four objects, click to align center (1), hold shift and click again to (2) align center on screen.

For decades, Photoshop users have used vertical and horizontal guides for layout and alignment. With the advent of Guide Sets, we were able to easily create more complicated layouts to accomodate web and print graphics. Now it's time we get the next step in creative control: snapping to paths. Request: Enable an option to allow snapping to paths.Feature elementsAllow current objects to snap to designated paths the same as guidesThese paths should be able to curve and orient to arbitrary angles, and control points on paths should still snap to traditional horizontal and vertical guidesAllow transparency bounds for snapping in addition to bounding box edgesAlign typographic, graphic, and illustrated elements with definite transparency edgesAllow anchor points to be relative to the object OR to the canvas by a switchWhen moved away from the Reference Point Location grid, anchor points switch to canvas (global) reference and do not move along with the transformed object or boundi

If I edit a jpg, tiff, psd type of file and I save_as it as other type, by default Photoshop will always offer saving to folder of the original file. If I open image from pdf file, Photoshop will default save_as to a folder that has been used for the previous save_as, even if Photoshop has been closed and started anew before editing image. It seems kind of natural that by default files are saved_as to the folder of original. So it happens to me I process multiple pdf files and than I search all over the file system for the possible location of those files. This is extremely annoying and I can't get used to this way of operation. Please, please, please, correct this.Kind regards,Uros Bogataj

What about paintbrush size changed through a slider on the tool bar at the top? This is missing when all the less important sliders exist, but the most important doesn't! Anyone think this is a good idea? Every other way of changing the brush size is more complicated! Agree?

Would it be possible to add scaling options to the frame tool when placing images?It would be a very useful addition.

I have saved a couple of watermarks in my library, my problem is how do I create an action that will insert the selected watermark from the library & place it on the image. I can create the action to resize the watermark & place it in my prefered loction once it's on the image but I can't get the action to bring it from the library & on to the image. Any help will be appreciated.Windows 10 ProPhotoshop 23.5.1

So sometimes when you start to get a large file with hundreds of layers photoshop can start to slow down a bit, even if you have a great machine.To speed up things, it would be great if you could essentially crop a selection or  "selections" of your document, and continue to work while retaining all your layers. You would mark "Focus Areas". Your focus area would crop that area off into a new document when double clicked, while retaining all the same layers of the Parent document it came from. Its essentially like a mix of crop tool, and smart objects. You can create multiple focus areas, and even up rez your Focused Area documents to get more pixels to work with as well. When your done you save, and photoshop will automatically update the focused area, and all the layers will link/merge directly back their original file. Again similar to smart objects. Benefits of this:1.) Divide your large Photoshop Document into smaller bite size areas when needed to speed up photoshop whi

With PShop Beta I would appreciate not changing settings such as:Zoom with Scroll Wheel - I have set this as my preference, and do not see any reason I would change it.

I really love the the 3D features in Photoshop. Please do not remove them.

I would like to be able to define the name of an artboard using a text variable. Currently you can only change the visibility of an artboard when defining variables. I create thousands of animated web banners in PS and the gifs have to be renamed manually. If the name of the artboard was variable, I could eliminate the very tedious step of renaming the files. 

I recently attempted to edit a photo of a wallet for an online sales thumbnail. The photo contains a tiny sliver of two US banknotes - you can't even see the numbers fully. Photoshop refuses to let me open the picture. Meanwhile, it lets me open two other, similar pictures with more of the banknotes showing. 1) The purpose for, and the way in which, I am using the pictures is acceptable under US currency laws. 2) The lack of consistancy and otherwise lack of given reason for why I cannot use one picture but can use the other two is very frustrating.3) How am I supposed to edit the picture to be "acceptable" if I can't use my photo editing software to do so??? 4) Obviously Photoshop is using some amount of AI to determine what looks enough like currency and what doesn't. Ok, fine. Use that to keep me from exporting the image, but really, let me open the image in the first place so I can fix any "problems" that the AI has. 5) "Work around" solutions sho

This request comes from a forum thread where i was asking question about the new video features in cs6 and how they can bw used for animation and storyboarding. http://forums.adobe.com/thread/978719 question number (1) At present when adding a new clip to the timeframe the default duration is set to 60 frames. It would be very helpful if that value could be set by the user. Currently if you want to animate you have to manually drag the duration of every layer by hand to a shorter value. Time consuming and rather annoying. I imagine the logical place to put something like this would be the timeline menu. It could be called "default layer duration" and could have the option of setting a time or number of frames. A bonus feature would be to have a check box for setting the duration to "auto duration". This would set the layer duration for an newly created layer to the same length as previous one. For example, if you create a new blank layer and drag is to 15 frames the next layer you crea

Photoshop needs to export to HEIF.  So does Lightroom.  Just reading HEIF files as input is not support.  Please rent a software engineer from Fuji, Sony, or Cannon.  They know how to create HEIF files.

Hi! I've been thinking this for quite a while, and I know most of the web designers out there have the same need... groupable, colorable, nameable guides.It's important to use guides. But sometimes it gets a little messy. What would be perfect is if guides had their own layer-style format. And each group, or layer, had an asigned color. You could turn on and off visibility of specific groups, or just turn them all off by hitting cmd + H, as we do today.This would make photoshop THE perfect software for web design.

Changing brush size on the fly is my (and many others) absolute most used process during a good work flow. The fact that the keybinds are different for that between Mac and windows is beyond me. Windows is easy, cntrl and right click/drag. But Mac.. for some God forsaken reason.. you had to throw in an additional key. The addition of a key (which mind you - will make you take your hand nearly completely off the keyboard to hit two keys at the very bottom left) for the same function is literally enough to make me buy a windows computer over a Mac because of how much it stumbles my work flow when switching between OS's. This has been an issue for years. Please make the Mac brush size hot key the same as windows so I don't go insane

Please fix the brush cursor. It is too thin to see on high res screens. Please provide an option to show it thicker. Same for the grid. Attached an image when the curor is hard to see and a close up of the same.It's worse when the cursor is smaller.Also an image wit the grid lines.

I recently discovered a new amazing feature in Photoshop --- only to find out it was intentionally removed from Photoshop (along with a bunch of other 3D features) likely because Adobe acquired Substance Painter. I simply don't understand -- why would you guys intentionally make Photoshop worse?   This is a very natural next step for Photoshop -- to have the ability to paint and draw in a more 3D dimenional environemnt. This is UNLIKE typical 3D programs because normally you're working with polygons, and geometry, but here you're just drawing in a 3D space in which you can move around the view of the camera to draw more and more.   Had I known this was a feature I'd have been using it long ago. Bow now this can't be done. Oddly, this can be done in Affinity photo. Umm.. guys? Do you even care about dropping the ball with Photoshop anymore?   The video I linked is literally not possible in Photoshop anyway thanks to sheer greed by Adobe (buy our other 3D software). Check

It would be useful if Photoshop was able to include separate guide layers ( and potentially be able to change the colour of the each guide (layer).There are frequently times when there are "master guides" in a document, but one wishes to quickly add extra guides for a specific area of the composition. Currently, these extra temporary guides must manually be dragged off the canvas after completing the sub-task, or a new document needs to be saved before starting to preserve the document with the master guides.