Stock Contributors

Dieses Foto wurde aus Qualitätsgründen abgelehnt. Warum

Hello, My Adobe Stock Contributor account () has been deactivated without any prior notice or explanation. I am an established contributor with over 20,000 active assets in my portfolio and a pending balance of $900 USD. I have always respected the submission guidelines and terms of service. I already opened a support case and my case number is ADB-46400961-B1W8, but I have not received a human response yet. Could an Adobe Employee or Moderator please help me escalate this case to the Contributor Relations team for a manual review? Thank you for your time and assistance. Kind regards, Diego

Hi There,My logo was rejected for being "too similar" to existing Adobe Stock content. However, I searched using multiple keywords before submitting and couldn't find any logo that closely matches this design.This logo was created entirely from scratch and is not copied or traced from any existing artwork. It has also been accepted on Shutterstock & others which made me even more curious about what Adobe considers too similar.Could anyone point me to the similar logo if you've seen one? I'd really appreciate any feedback on what makes this design appear too similar and how I can improve it for resubmission. Best Regards  

My account was suspended in May, it took 6 weeks for the appeal to be looked at and it was then reinstated.Adobe made it clear that fraudulent downloads was the issue ($24 worth) which I had no involvement in, knowledge of or ability to prevent. So I lost 6 weeks of income because of someone else’s actions. My account has a perfect record over the last 6 years.My account has been live again for 3 weeks, I’ve been watching the downloads like a hawk and have seen nothing unusual. I received exactly the same ‘account blocked for suspicious activities’ this morning. Has anyone else had this happen?I’ve filed a support ticket and appeal form again but don’t know if I’ve got it in me to keep going round like this. It feels very helpless to have no control over why your account is blocked, especially when they made it clear I’d done nothing wrong. Mods, thanks for everything you do but I’m looking for other contributors who have had the same thing happen. I’ve filed a ticket and appeal throug

Liebe Community. Ich habe meine ersten Fotos (Serie Alphütte) hochgeladen, doch sie wurden alle abgelehnt. Ohne konkreten Grund, natürlich würde ich gerne lernen was ich genau falsch gemacht habe. Herzlichen Dank für Eure Hilfe.  

Please give me advice to fix this rejection. so i can fix and resubmit it again. i think my vector file doesn’t contains raster/bitmap image. This is the rejection reason: QUALITY ISSUESYour file has one or more of these issues:Your vector file contains a raster/bitmap image, and vector files must not contain raster elements. Your JPEG preview file has been compressed too much, so textural problems have occurred in the file. Your JPEG preview resolution must not be less than 5,000 X 3,000 (15 million pixels) You didn't use anti-aliasing when exporting your vector file to JPEG, so there are problems with lines on the JPEG file Thank you

I usually create drawings using oil, watercolor, gouache, and pencil brushes to add texture to my artwork. However, my submissions are often rejected due to quality issues. What can I do to get them accepted? Even when I add solid lines around the edges, they still get rejected. And does submitting them as transparent PNGs without a background also lead to rejection?

Shot using a Sony a6700 with a Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 lens. Edited in Lightroom. 

Hello,This is my first Adobe Stock payout.The payout of USD 25.22 has been stuck in Pending since July 21, 2026.My PayPal email is correct, and I have already completed the W-8BEN tax form.Could someone from Adobe please check the status of my payout?Thank you.

My Adobe account was deactivated due to inactivity on my part for a long period. I actually was not sure about the type of content I would upload back then. But since I gained confidence in terms of the content that i would submit to Adobe, unfortunately my account was deactivatedc.Subsequently, I sent emails to Adobe requesting for my account to be re instaterd.I unfortunately have not heard from Adobe to date!I request the team at Adobe to relook into my request and reinstate my account as I am eager to contribute to Adobe.Look forward to an early resolution.Warm Regards Rakesh Raina[PPI removed by moderator.]

I would love and really appreciate some feedback on why this wasn’t accepted :). I’m new to photography and could really use some tips for uploading

Buongiorno, come fare quando viene chiesta una liberatoria se ci sono persone NON visibili in volto o molto molto lontane e NON riconoscibili? Grazie

Reasons it was rejected: Common issues that can impact the technical quality of images include exposure issues, soft focus, excessive filtering or artifacts/noise. 

Hello,My Adobe Stock contributor account has been locked as "Inactive" for a long time. I would like to start uploading photos again.I tried to contact support using the internal contact form, but I keep getting a red error message: "Je nám líto, ale při odesílání vašeho případu došlo k chybě." The Virtual Assistant bot on the help page also refuses to connect me to a live agent because I do not have a paid subscription.Could an Adobe Staff member please look into this and manually forward my request to the Stock support team? Thank you very much for your help.

Hi, I have a question regarding my photos. They are being rejected due to quality issues; other stock sites have accepted them, but here I’m having trouble with almost every other image. I don’t have much experience with stock photography, so I’d appreciate your feedback on what to improve and what to look out for. Thanks for the reply. 

I have been using Adobe Stock for vector graphics for many years, but over the last months I have noticed a significant decline in the quality of many vector assets.More and more often I download files that appear perfectly fine in the preview, only to discover after opening them in Illustrator that they are poorly constructed. Typical issues include unnecessary anchor points, messy paths, overlapping objects, poorly drawn curves, and vectors that require extensive cleanup before they can actually be used.What is even more frustrating is that some of these files look very much like AI-generated vectors, yet they are not labeled as AI-generated content. As a customer, I expect to know whether an asset has been created by a human or generated with AI, especially when the resulting vector file does not meet the quality standards that Adobe Stock was known for.Downloading an asset only to find out afterwards that it is unusable is a waste of time and credits. The preview image often does n

Hey everyone, Would be grateful if anyone could provide some detailed critique on my pics. Just bought a Canon R50 and started taking pics.I’m a beginner’s beginner so I don’t expect Adobe to accept a lot of my submissions but what does not help is a generic reason like quality issues. Among my 78 submissions, 2 have been accepted. So, if there’s anything I could work on ,please do chime in.Attaching one.Please and Thanks.Edit :  As suggested by Danielle, inserting an image rather than attaching multiple.THanks for letting me know of the file size limitation. 

This is a selection of photos rejected. all are minimal edits of naturally occurring phenomena, and I believe it is due to AI not understanding what Cloud Iridescence and Circumhorizontal arcs are, not a quality problem. (note these are downsampled, alternate vsns of the same .NEF edits of 3/24 submitted) [Moved to Stock Contributors by a moderator］

Hi everyone! I have a question about the number of photos that get reviewed or approved each day.Is the daily review or approval limit related to a user's approval rate?  I'd like to upload 10–20 AI-generated images or photos I've taken myself every day, but it seems that only 2–4 of my submissions are reviewed daily.  I've also noticed that once I have around 30 submissions waiting for review, I'm temporarily prevented from uploading any new work. Is this how the platform normally works, or is there something I should know about the review process?  Thanks in advance for any insights!

I downloaded File #:  2017944258 as an .svg, only to open Illustrator and be met with a flattened, pixelated file. I did not receive a scalable file as expected. How do I get a credit refund, as well as report the image for improper file types? Thanks. 

Hi everyone,I have already submitted my W-8BEN form. I would like to know:Do I need to pay income tax in India on my Adobe Stock earnings? Should I report the gross earnings shown by Adobe, or only the amount actually received in my bank account after any deductions?If anyone from India has already filed taxes on Adobe Stock income, I'd really appreciate it if you could share your experience.

This is my 3D render image , I send in the format of transparent png.it was rejected please help to specify the reason of qaulity issueThank you

Hi everyone,I have an issue with my contributor profile. It's not visible to the public at all. When I try to view it from the dashboard it says there is no results.Does anyone know how to fix this?

Hello, I recently submitted several photos taken with a Sony RX100 VII, and most of them were rejected for “quality issues.” The images were transferred directly from the camera to my phone using the Sony app at their original resolution, around 20 MP. Some were uploaded without editing, while a few were only slightly cropped. I understand that the “quality issues” rejection can include focus problems, motion blur, noise, compression artifacts, exposure issues, or insufficient detail. However, I am having difficulty identifying the specific problem in these images. Could you please take a look and tell me what the most likely technical issue is? Is it mainly softness, missed focus, camera shake, noise, or something else? I would especially appreciate feedback on which images are technically unsuitable for stock and which ones might be improved through better editing or resubmission.Thank you.