Connect with creators in the official Stock community.
Recently active
This is an example what I get when I search Illustrations for a phrase:https://stock.adobe.com/hu/search/images?filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aphoto%5D=0&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aillustration%5D=1&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Azip_vector%5D=0&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Avideo%5D=0&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Atemplate%5D=0&filters%5Bcontent_type%3A3d%5D=0&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aaudio%5D=0&filters%5Bcontent_type%3Aimage%5D=1&filters%5Breleases%3Ais_include%5D=1&filters%5Boffensive%3A2%5D=1&filters%5Binclude_stock_enterprise%5D=0&filters%5Bis_editorial%5D=0&k=working+on++laptop&order=relevance&safe_search=0&search_page=1&load_type=page&search_type=pagination&get_facets=1TLDR: The results are polluted with AI generated content by up to 90%.Unusable right now.
Hallo, kann ich Fotos mit dem Vermerk: “generiert mir KI - Die redaktionelle Nutzung darf nicht irreführend oder täuschend sein” auf meine Website stellen?Viele Grüße und danke vorab!Inna
The subject header says it all really. Working on an environmental documentary series that cannot use any generative AI images. Due to the amount of un labelled gen AI video, I'd decided against using any Adobe stock. However, I needed a few additional videos and went against my better instincts to download some previews. Then today I was dropping some of these into a timeline and out of the ten I'd downloaded, something seemed off and upon closer inspection at least 3 were gen AI . The responsibility shouldnt fall upon the user to police this, it should fall upon Adobe. Any supplier who cannot provide some form of proof of authenticity for non AI conetent shouldnt be allowed to label it as such. End of story. These very nearly went into the final cuts and as gen AI gets harder to spot it's going to become more of a problem.
This stock file is a raster image: https://stock.adobe.com/au/images/wedding-and-love-themed-vector-icon-set-featuring-organized-collections-of-romance-nature-and-luxury-design-elements-collection-marriage-ornament-invitation-ceremony-anniversary-valentine/2083553118
Hello,I need help with an existing Adobe Stock Intellectual Property case: Case ID 963612.The case concerns an old Fotolia licence for Asset ID 90816138. I licensed the image through my former Fotolia account, but the historical Fotolia licence history is no longer accessible in my current Adobe account.Adobe requested additional information from me on 21 August 2026, and I provided everything requested the same day. I have followed up several times since then but have not yet received an update.A rights-management company is waiting for Adobe's verification and has now set a new response deadline of 7 September 2026.Could an Adobe employee please check whether Case 963612 can be reviewed or routed to the team that has access to archived Fotolia licence records?Thank you very much.Andreas
Hello,I am trying to add and verify my mobile phone number for my account security, but i am not receiving any OTP SMS code.When I try to submit the number (+8562096328455), it shows the error message: “ an error occurred during this operation. Please try again later.”Could you please help check or resolve this phone verification issue for my account?Thank you.
What has happened to all the adobe stock illustrator assests. They are garbage and you can't use them. 80% of the time when I download a .ai asset it is trash and obviously a trace. I don't want to have to ask for a refund every single time when it is 80% of the time. Look at these three files I just downloaded. #2061475841. #2123046716 #2034659405
Recently I had issues with many supposedly ‘vector’ files that I have downloaded, which then turned out to be images embedded into .ai file. I think they’re all AI generated slop. I can’t seem to be able to report this, especially frustrating as I used up a credit for these. I can’t directly contact support and I can’t imagine IT administrator of a large company will be chasing every credit and stock issue. A lot of vector files are also AI slop with many AI artefacts, and there’s no way to easily report this or get the credits back. Adobe is getting away with more and more scammy tactics these days. This is one of them:https://stock.adobe.com/uk/images/colorful-illustrated-collection-of-open-oyster-shells-with-pearls/2123064433?prev_url=detailhere’s ai image example:https://stock.adobe.com/uk/images/colorful-seashell-pattern-vector-background-cute-beach-shells-and-ocean-summer-clipart/2169157235?prev_url=detail
It can be hard to differentiate my downloaded assets without opening them if they’re any file outside of a JPG or PNG so it’d be great if some or all of the title text was included in the downloaded asset file name.
I used ai tools to create 8k wallpapers of UNESCO World Heritage sites in Italy (Pantheon, Naples city center, Roman theater at Taormina etc) and am now unsure about whether they are still “kosher”. Italy has certain provisions for protecting/licensing cultural monuments. My representations are photorealistic and present the monuments in a beautiful, not satirical way. Is there a clear way forward? Thanks in advance,Scot
I’m asking if i can sell my Mahjong sets thru Etsy, Amazon and other Mahjong companies with a stand license subscription. Most of the images I downloaded were vector images.
I finally had to reinstall the older PS Beta 27.9 on both my workstation and laptop, and the on-device remove tool to work on my Nvidia RTX 4090/5080 series with16GB VRAM. I’m running the current Nvidia Studio Driver 610.88. However, updating to PS 27.9.1 or PS Beta 27.9.11 causes the on-device remove tool to severely stall and must cancel. Using the Cloud option works only if on WiFi, but I am still waiting for an update fix for the on-device to function properly. This issue has been ongoing for over three months!! BTW - No logs are necessary to collect send as the identical issue can be recreated on any PC using Windows 11 and the RTX having 16GBVram card at Adobe PS lab, then read the log.
I downloaded the file, illustrator says the link is missing / broken.
Hi Adobe Staff,I am trying to complete my Adobe Stock Contributor account setup, but I cannot complete the mandatory phone verification step. Every time I enter my Bangladesh (+880) phone number (+880*** moderator deleted private data ***), it shows: "An error occurred while performing this action. Please try again later."I have tried:- Clearing browser cache and cookies- Using multiple browsers (Chrome, Firefox)- Entering number with and without country code/leading zerosIt seems to be an SMS gateway/backend issue for Bangladesh (+880) numbers. Since I do not have a paid subscription, the support bot does not connect me to a live agent. Could an Adobe Staff member please assist in resolving or manually adding the phone number for my account?*** moderator deleted private data ***
Assets #: 452989837 and 452989915I believe these images are mislabeled. The images are identified as [Boston, Massachusetts Skyline from above by Drone during Summer Time], but it appears to depict [the skyline of Hartford, Connecticut, USA] Could the moderation team please review the asset metadata and labeling? Thank you.
Bonjour,Je découvre avec effarement que ma formule gratuite adobe stock me coûte en réalité 20€ par mois depuis septembre, et que toute résilitaion "anticipée" (alors que je ne me suis jamais engagée!!!) me coutera la modique somme de ....140€!Je désire bien entendu rétablir justice: que mon abonnement, que je n'ai jamais contracté, soit annulé gratuitement, et les paiements indument prélevés sur mon compte remboursés.Pour cela je souhaite téléphoner ou envoyer un mail, et en parallèle porter plainte pour escroquerie.Quels sont les mails et téléphone de contact adobe pour ce type de litige SVP?
Does anyone else using Google Chrome have massive issues trying to access their stock library? I can view it, but scrolling through, trying to open older graphics to download or even just the hover over download options are a constant painful glitch / bug and makes it almost impossible to access older files to re-download etc.
I’m at a loss as to why these photos were not accepted. I have a well-established portfolio of travel photography, and similar images have been accepted on other stock sites without any issues.Adobe’s rejection reason was simply “Quality Issues.” The photo below is a typical travel illustrative content, shot on mirrorless full frame, minimal post-processing: Carved pātaka storehouse and palisade, Te Parapara Garden, New ZealandOk, this photo was processed as HDR to bring back the shadows. There is a bit of grain going on in the rocky part of the mountain, but I wouldn’t think this to be a reason for rejection: Car approaching Mount Ngāuruhoe on the Desert Road at dusk, New ZealandThese mountain parrots are quite rare, so I was very happy to get this shot in the wild. The bird’s eye and feathers look sharp to me. The background blur cannot be avoided: Kea close-up on rocky summit near Mount Luxmore, Kepler Track, New Zealand I am open to constructive critique. Just trying understand wh
BonjourJ’ai reçu un mail pour une image gratuite Photoshop mais elle n’est pas gratuite.“Voici votre modèle gratuit pour Adobe Photoshop”Merci de vos réponses
Hi everyone,We never migrated our Fotolia account to Adobe Stock back in 2018.Is there still a way to get the license/download history for some images we licensed from Fotolia account?When we try to log in on fotolia.com i’m automatically redirected to Adobe Stock and the old migration process no longer works.Any advice?Thank you!
Bonjour.Je viens de télécharger 2 fichiers vectoriels qui ne contient rien car il y a un fichier lié qui n’est pas incorporé…Il s’agit des fichiers : AdobeStock_2079832667 et AdobeStock_2079832532Il provient tous les deux du même contributeur : https://stock.adobe.com/fr/contributor/212732183/gulshan?load_type=author&prev_url=detailLe contenu du portfolio est sans équivoque… que de la génération par IA et les éléments soit disant vectoriels sont de la vectorisation dynamique inexploitable au final…Autant quelque fichiers sont signalés ‘’Généré avec IA’’ mais beaucoup ne le sont pas…Merci de votre aide.
It is disappointing to see how increasingly disconnected Adobe seems to have become from the people who actually use its products.Changes are introduced constantly, yet many of them seem less and less aligned with the real workflows and needs of creative professionals.The latest example is Adobe Stock. When I click on a stock asset in Safari, I am now taken directly into AI Studio instead of being able to properly inspect the asset itself. If I want to use AI Studio, I am perfectly capable of making that decision myself.By forcing me into AI Studio, Adobe is actually taking away information and functionality that is relevant to my work — such as reviewing the asset details, the contributor, and other images from the same series before deciding whether an asset is suitable for a project.This is becoming symptomatic of a bigger problem. Adobe increasingly feels like a product-driven organization pushing features it wants customers to use, rather than a customer-driven organization improv
I am trying to create an Adobe Stock Contributor account from Bangladesh. Bangladesh (+880) is selected, but when I enter my valid Bangladeshi mobile number I receive “An error occurred while performing this action. Please try again later.” I have tried different browsers and the correct international number format, but the issue persists. Please help me verify my phone number or provide an alternative way to complete Contributor registration.
I am expressing my severe frustration with a recent change to the Adobe Stock browsing experience.Currently, when I click on an image simply to inspect it or take a closer look, the site automatically redirects me to the Studio page. This forced redirect is completely breaking my workflow.Because of this, I can no longer access the standard image details page. This means I have lost the ability to do basic, essential tasks like:Clicking to search for similar images.Clicking on the contributor's name to browse the same artist's portfolio.This is a ridiculous and highly disruptive design choice. When I click on an asset, my goal is to inspect that specific image and explore related content—not to be pushed into the Studio interface against my will. It makes finding and sourcing the right images incredibly difficult and frustrating and making me question using Adobe Stock.
I used to be able to right click on an image in Adobe Stock to download a comp image which had the image number in the filename. Now, I am unable to even click and download a comp image. How can we do this with the new AI Studio window that comes up when I click on an image now?
Remix with Firefly Community Gallery
Thousands of free creations to fall in love with and remix in Firefly.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.